Politics & Policy

Random Thoughts — or Provocations

(Getty Images)
In many ways, the public is on our side.

Here are some fairly random things that, it is safe to say, a large majority of Americans would agree with:

‐Al Sharpton is not in any way a legitimate spokesman for racial “justice,” much less racial healing.

‐Wendy Davis does not speak for most American women.

‐Sandra Fluke does not speak for most American women.

‐Lena Dunham does not even come close to speaking for most American women.

‐Barack Obama comes across as arrogant — and there are no racial connotations in that statement.

‐Obama has made a habit of insulting, belittling, and mocking those who don’t agree with him. George W. Bush almost never did so.

‐The practice of insulting, belittling, and mocking those who disagree creates a tone that, to say the least, is anything but “presidential.”

‐The idea of EPA agents swooping in on businesses or municipal installments while armed to the gills — which they do, repeatedly — is outrageous, frightening, and completely contrary to American values.

‐There is no excuse, in a republic with constitutional protections as strong and well observed as ours, for violent riots that harm innocent bystanders and businesses. Those who engage in such riots, if caught, should be shown no mercy, but rather punished to the full extent the law allows.

‐It is ludicrous, and sickening, for somebody to seriously advocate fining and imprisoning people — even just leading “money men” — who disagree with, and advocate opposition to, leftist policies in response to the theory of major man-made climate change.

. . . Actually, let’s unpack this one a tiny bit. When I wrote a column that objected to such a despicable (and dangerously authoritarian) proposal for trampling on the First Amendment, Steven Payne at The Daily Kos replied that I was objecting too much because, after all, it is only “the profiteers from the denial of climate change who should be held accountable.” Gee, that makes it better. So the First Amendment doesn’t apply if you’re in business? How nice. Well, I am getting paid for this column, and I deny the theory of man-made climate change. Does that make me a “profiteer” from “denialism”? If so, come get me. But, speaking of a change in climate, it’ll be a cold day in Hell before you succeed.

Back to the list . . . 

‐Accused rapists have the same right to presumption of innocence as everybody else. Especially if the accusation is first published by Rolling Stone or by Lena Dunham.

‐People actually convicted of rape should be shown no mercy, and indeed most of them should serve longer sentences than they do.

‐Both major American party establishments, Democratic and Republican alike, kowtow far too readily to big donors, big business, big labor, et cetera, and pay far too little attention to the actual views of manual laborers, service workers, shopkeepers, and owners of very small businesses. Senator Jeff Sessions of Alabama is right: Populism, understood correctly, should not be a dirty word; in a republic, it ought to be a governing principle. (That’s why, by the way, both Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and former senator James Webb of Virginia are absolutely right in their populist tones, even if spectacularly wrong, in Warren’s case, especially, on substance — which, in turn, is why both could give fits to gazillionaire Hillary Clinton in Democratic primaries in a year or so.)

‐Judges matter. And conservative positions on the judiciary are winning positions, not subjects to shy away from.

‐The federal government has promulgated far too many rules, and enforces them with far too little common sense. (By the way, here’s a hint for a congressman willing to do painstakingly hard work in order to make a huge difference in daily lives, even if the purely political payoff might be almost negligible in the short run: Have your staff convene conservative experts to produce a total rewrite of the Administrative Procedures Act. It is a travesty, it is antiquated, and it allows administrative abuses that plague millions of daily lives.)

‐Obamacare isn’t a basically good law with a few flaws that need to be fixed; it’s a fundamentally awful law with a very, very few good provisions. It can’t be “fixed,” but must be completely replaced — and with government playing a much smaller role in the end result.

‐If Obama left the White House on New Year’s Day, he would be leaving 2,172 days too late. And it would be 2,172 days too late even if he were as white as the new-fallen snow.

— Quin Hillyer is a contributing editor for National Review. Follow him on Twitter: @QuinHillyer.

Most Popular


Yes, Hillary Should Have Been Prosecuted

I know this is ancient history, but — I’m sorry — I just can’t let it go. When historians write the definitive, sordid histories of the 2016 election, the FBI, Hillary, emails, Russia, and Trump, there has to be a collection of chapters making the case that Hillary should have faced a jury ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Yes, There Was FBI Bias

There is much to admire in Justice Department inspector general Michael Horowitz’s highly anticipated report on the FBI’s Clinton-emails investigation. Horowitz’s 568-page analysis is comprehensive, fact-intensive, and cautious to a fault. It is also, nonetheless, an incomplete exercise — it omits half ... Read More

Let the World Have Soccer

The United States of America did not qualify for the World Cup this year. Good for us. Soccer is corrupt, hyper-regulated, impoverished by a socialist-style fondness for rationing, and organized to strangle human flourishing. It is so dependent on the whims of referees that is in effect a helpless captive of the ... Read More
Economy & Business

Asymmetrical Capitalism

I like to think of American Airlines CEO Doug Parker as my pen pal, but, in truth, he never writes back. It’s a lopsided relationship — asymmetrical, in a word. I have for many years argued that most people would be enthusiastic about capitalism if not for their interactions with a small number of ... Read More

Child Separation at the Border

If you want to read a thoughtful and constructive explanation and partial defense of the policies being implemented by the White House, you should read this piece by Rich Lowry. If you want to read a trollish and counter-productive screed fit for a comment section, read the White House’s official press ... Read More

Staying on the Path

Dear Reader (Including those of you who are no longer my personal lawyer), Almost 20 years ago, I wrote in this space that the movie A Simple Plan was one of the most conservative movies of the 1990s. In case you haven’t seen it, the plot is pretty straightforward, almost clichéd. It focuses on three men ... Read More