Politics & Policy

Obama’s New Foreign Policy Doctrine: “Strategic Patience”

Why didn’t I try this one on the nuns when I didn’t get my 5th grade homework done? “Patience, Sister.” Yeah, that would have gone well …

Brendan’s post outlines Susan Rice’s Brookings speech today during which she minimized threats to American national security and gussied up as a shrewd “strategy” what has seemed to us mere mortals to be the president’s inability to respond to threats (or, say, 8-hour jihadist mass-murder attacks not caused by obscure movie trailers).

It is called Obama’s doctrine of … wait for it (and wait … and wait) … “Strategic Patience.”

This is not a parody. “The challenges we face require strategic patience and persistence,” wrote the president in the 35-page, long overdue (patience, patience …) National Security Strategy document delivered to Congress on Friday. In it, Obama explains how he has outlawed torture (which was outlawed for years before he before he took office by a quaint institution known as Congress) while “lead[ing] the world through a shifting security landscape toward a more durable peace and a new prosperity” – which you must have noticed.

Just two more years. Patience. 

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Did Flynn Lie?

At the outset, let’s get two things straight: First, there is something deeply disturbing about the Obama administration’s decision to open a counterintelligence investigation on retired lieutenant general Michael Flynn while he was working on the Trump campaign — and, ultimately, about the Justice ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Where Is the Flynn 302?

Better late than never (I hope), my weekend column has posted on the website. It deals with the question whether General Michael Flynn actually lied to the FBI agents — including the now infamous Peter Strzok — when they interviewed him in the White House on his third day on the job as national security ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Who’s in Charge Here?

In the run-up to the 2016 presidential election, Donald Trump was asked on many occasions whether he would “accept the results” of the election if he were to lose. Democrats and their media allies demanded that he make a solemn vow to “accept the results.” It was never entirely clear what anybody thought ... Read More