Politics & Policy

DNC Chair Once Again Refuses to Say Whether Her Party Opposes Ban on Third-Trimester Abortions

Democratic National Committee chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D., Fla.) refused to say whether there should be any restrictions on abortion at any point in a pregnancy in an interview with Fox News’s Megyn Kelly on Tuesday.

In the wake of Wasserman Schultz’s spat with Senator Rand Paul (R., Ky.), who recently pressed reporters to confront the chairwoman on her (and her party’s) positions on abortion as they do with Republican presidential candidates, Kelly conceded that Paul hasn’t been direct in saying if supports exceptions in cases of rape and incest. But she said she still wanted Wasserman Schultz to clarify when she believes life begins, and what stage in a pregnancy, if any, should be a legal cut-off point for abortions.

RELATED: Democrats Are the Real Abortion Extremists

At first, Wasserman Schultz resorted to boilerplate rhetoric about not wanting to “roll back” abortion rights for women and dismissive comments — “Look at what we’re talking about,” she laughed at one point — but Kelly noted that polls show that most Americans oppose abortions as late as the third trimester. Nonetheless, the congresswoman stood by the general premise that it’s a matter to be decided between a woman and her doctor, before taking a shot at Paul.

“In terms of personal liberty, we definitely have a different opinion, Rand Paul and I do,” she said.

“You would admit you can’t have women aborting third-trimester babies just on a whim, right?” Kelly followed up. Despite claiming there was “no ambivalence” in her response, Wasserman Schultz dodged again, focusing only on the “on a whim” part of Kelly’s question.

#related#”I can’t tell you a specific date and time past which we in all cases are certain that choice shouldn’t be made,” she continued. “That decision is very unique and individual to the woman.”

As the interview wrapped up, Wasserman Schultz called for Paul to “stop deflecting and answer the darn question.”

Andrew Johnson is an editorial associate at National Review Online.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Hillary Ruins the Plan

Editor’s note: Andrew C. McCarthy’s new book is Ball of Collusion: The Plot to Rig an Election and Destroy a Presidency. This is the first in a series of excerpts.  There really was a collusion plot. It really did target our election system. It absolutely sought to usurp our capacity for ... Read More
Religion

Another Pop-Culture Christian Loses His Faith

It’s happened again. For the second time in three weeks, a prominent (at least in Evangelical circles) Christian has renounced his faith. In July, it was Josh Harris, a pastor and author of the mega-best-selling purity-culture book I Kissed Dating Goodbye. This month, it’s Hillsong United songwriter and ... Read More
Culture

Max Boot’s Dishonesty

Before yesterday, my primary criticism of the Washington Post’s Max Boot was political in nature. As I wrote in a recent book review, I found it regrettable that Boot’s opposition to the president had not prevented him from “succumbing reactively to Trump’s cult of personality, or from making Trump the ... Read More
Elections

A Brief History of Election Meddling

Editor’s note: Andrew C. McCarthy’s new book is Ball of Collusion: The Plot to Rig an Election and Destroy a Presidency. This is the second in a series of excerpts. ‘The 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back.” Thus spoke President Barack Obama just a couple of weeks before ... Read More
World

The End of Hong Kong as We Know It

The protests in Hong Kong have been going on for more than four months now, and no matter how the current crisis concludes in the coming days or weeks, it will mark the end of Hong Kong as we know it. The protests started in response to an extradition bill that was proposed by the city’s Beijing-backed ... Read More