Politics & Policy

Why Abortion Groups Are Not Challenging Laws to Protect Pain-Capable Unborn Children

The West Virginia law banning elective abortion after five months, or 20 weeks, took effect near the end of May. Normally we would not be surprised if Planned Parenthood or some other plaintiff had already filed suit challenging the law.

But in this case? Crickets. I have seen no report that either Planned Parenthood or any other organization or individual has filed a lawsuit challenging the West Virginia Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act.

Maybe in coming days we’ll see new litigation in West Virginia or some other state with a law against abortion after five months, by which time an unborn child is capable of feeling pain. I’m not saying we won’t see such litigation. Indeed, I hope we do. That way a case might reach the U.S. Supreme Court and the Court can uphold 20-week laws as constitutional.

But in the meantime, the silence is telling.

As Alliance Defending Freedom attorney Casey Mattox explains, it suggests that abortion advocates lack confidence in their litigation prospects.

There has been litigation involving 20-week laws in Arizona and Idaho. Both Arizona and Idaho fall under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which ruled against 20-week laws in both cases. (According to Mattox, “Another lawsuit now in the Georgia Supreme Court has achieved a preliminary injunction solely on state constitutional grounds because the abortionist who sued asked the court not to rule on any federal constitutional questions.”)

In many if not most cases, 20-week laws will have the effect of prohibiting abortion before viability. The “viability rule” created by the U.S. Supreme Court provides that government may not prohibit abortion before viability.

But the problem for Planned Parenthood and other abortion advocates is that the viability rule is indefensible both morally and as a matter of constitutional law. Because these laws advance a state interest — protecting pain-capable babies from pain — that wasn’t considered by the Supreme Court in Roe or Casey, a federal intermediate appellate court would be justified in concluding that the viability rule does not apply to 20-week laws. That would create a split with the Ninth Circuit. And in a 20-week case, the Supreme Court might very well constrain the viability rule in a way allowing for 20-week laws, or even abandon the viability rule altogether.

By not filing more lawsuits against 20-week laws, Planned Parenthood and other pro-abortion-rights plaintiffs are doing what they can to avoid a circuit split on the issue, helping to push off the day of reckoning.

“Why have abortion advocates chosen not to challenge these laws that they spill so many words attacking?” Mattox has written. “Fear. They know that their arguments for late-term abortion are likely to fail outside the Ninth Circuit — and probably in the Supreme Court.”

As Mattox notes, “every day that passes where abortionists leave fetal pain statutes on the books is further testimony that Planned Parenthood’s claims [that Pain-Capable laws harm women’s health] cannot be trusted.”

Most Popular


Angela Rye Knows You’re Racist

The political philosopher Michael Oakeshott said that the “rationalist” is hopelessly lost in ideology, captivated by the world of self-contained coherence he has woven from strands of human experience. He concocts a narrative about narratives, a story about stories, and adheres to the “large outline which ... Read More

What the Viral Border-Patrol Video Leaves Out

In an attempt to justify Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s absurd comparison of American detention facilities to Holocaust-era concentration camps, many figures within the media have shared a viral video clip of a legal hearing in which a Department of Justice attorney debates a panel of judges as to what constitutes ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Pro-Abortion Nonsense from John Irving

The novelist has put up a lot of easy targets in his New York Times op-ed. I am going to take aim at six of his points, starting with his strongest one. First: Irving asserts that abortion was legal in our country from Puritan times until the 1840s, at least before “quickening.” That’s an overstatement. ... Read More
Film & TV

Murder Mystery: An Old Comedy Genre Gets Polished Up

I  like Adam Sandler, and yet you may share the sense of trepidation I get when I see that another of his movies is out. He made some very funny manboy comedies (Billy Madison, Happy Gilmore, The Waterboy) followed by some not-so-funny manboy comedies, and when he went dark, in Reign over Me and Funny People, ... Read More