Holocaust-Denying Professor Suggests That Cosby’s Accusers May Have Just Been ‘Sluts’

A tenured, Holocaust-denying professor at taxpayer-funded Lincoln University in Pennsylvania suggested that Bill Cosby’s accusers may have waited so long to report their attacks because “many women are sluts.”

On July 8, English professor Kaukab Siddique posted a list of reasons that could explain the delayed rape reports on his Facebook page:

“Was it:

1. He paid them off.

2. Many women are sluts.

3. American women are slaves of rich men.

4. Random sex is quite acceptable in America.

5. They don’t have families like Muslims do who would take revenge for rape.

I really want to know. These ‘liberated’ women of America have taken 10, 20, even 30 years to complain openly. Why?”

The post appears to have since been deleted, but that doesn’t mean that Siddique is sorry:

“I was asking my readers what they thought of these five possibilities,” he said in an interview with the Daily Beast. “The reason I was writing five items is because I’m not sure what is going on with American women.”

Siddique is no stranger to controversy. In May, he called on Muslims to “prepare themselves” because “if Zionist Pamela Geller has her way, the racists might try to enter mosques.”

“Don’t be scared of these dirty Jewish Zionist White Supremacist thugs,” he added.

Yes — he said “dirty Jewish Zionist White Supremacist thugs.” But that shouldn’t be too surprising, considering that he has also called on people “to defeat, to destroy, to dismantle Israel” and stated that the Holocaust never happened.

According to the Daily Beast, Siddique also expressed doubts that ISIS was really raping and torturing women during the site’s phone interview with him:

#related#“If they’re doing terrible things to women, what women in their right mind would go to join them?” he asked. “All these women who are joining them, are they total idiots? Or zombies?”

A university spokesman decried Siddique’s statements in an e-mail to the Daily Beast, calling them “an insult to women and other groups singled out” that “in no way represent the views of Lincoln University,” but also defended the professor’s right to make them.

“Like all faculty members, he is entitled to express his personal views in conversation or in public forums, as long as he does not present such opinions as views of the University,” the spokesperson said.