National Security & Defense

Truman Made the Right Call. And It’s Probably Why I’m Alive to Tell the Tale

Aftermath of the atomic bombing in Hiroshima.

Seventy years ago yesterday, an Army Air Forces B-29 dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Nagasaki. Following the bombing of Hiroshima three days earlier, Nagasaki’s destruction compelled Japan’s unconditional surrender on August 14, 1945.

And without President Truman’s choice to use atomic weapons — twice — I probably wouldn’t have been born. After all, in 1945, my grandfather was a Marine field lineman specializing in the hazardous provision of communications wire between the lines; he was assigned to the 22nd Marine Regiment, 6th Marine Division, 1st Army. The 1st Army was set to lead Operation Coronet: the assault on Japan’s Honshu Island to seize Tokyo. Based on the increasing ferocity of Japanese resistance as Allied forces approached the mainland, analysts suggested that the U.S. military would lose hundreds of thousands in the invasion of Japan. In three days at the Battle of Okinawa, for example, my grandfather’s battalion suffered 400 casualties.

SLIDESHOW: Hiroshima & Nagasaki

In the summer of 1945, as U.S commanders considered the impending invasion, they were expecting a bloodbath. The A-bombs offered an alternative to this looming catastrophe.

The A-bombs probably saved millions of Japanese lives. Planning total resistance against invasion, Japanese military leaders had armed civilians with improvised weapons such as sharpened bamboo sticks.

In addition, the A-bombs probably saved millions of Japanese lives. Planning total resistance against invasion, Japanese military leaders had armed civilians with improvised weapons such as sharpened bamboo sticks. These civilians were to be thrown against Allied forces. Those who didn’t fight? Suicide rates during the Battle of Okinawa suggest that many Japanese civilians would have committed suicide rather than surrender.

Yet some imagine that there was a third alternative between invasion and atomic bombs: patience. They claim that Japan would have surrendered later in 1945 regardless of U.S. action. Unfortunately, this thinking is delusional, at best. It was not until the bombing of Nagasaki that Tokyo’s momentum swung toward peace. Even at that point, some Japanese military officials moved against the emperor to prevent surrender. They wanted to fight on, gambling that they could compel better terms by bloodying the invading allies. They were prepared to scorch Japan in that pursuit.

To his great credit, President Truman realized that only immediate decisive force would force imperial Japan to fold. Having served in World War I, Truman was personally aware of war’s horror. But he knew that alongside humility and caution in the face of individual suffering, leadership in war also requires honest measurement of awful options. And Harry Truman made the right call.

Celebrating his 90th birthday recently, my grandfather offered a joking solution, referring to Iwo Jima, in case the moment hadn’t been recorded: “We can get a rerun. Like Mount Suribachi.” Life is precious. I’m glad my grandfather and many other American grandfathers and many Japanese civilians didn’t have to die on Honshu’s Kantō Plain.

— Tom Rogan is a writer and a panelist on The McLaughlin Group. He tweets @TomRtweets. His homepage is

Tom Rogan is a columnist for National Review Online, a contributor to the Washington Examiner, and a former panelist on The McLaughlin Group. Email him at

Most Popular

White House

The Trivialization of Impeachment

We have a serious governance problem. Our system is based on separation of powers, because liberty depends on preventing any component of the state from accumulating too much authority -- that’s how tyrants are born. For the system to work, the components have to be able to check each other: The federal and ... Read More

Put Up or Shut Up on These Accusations, Hillary

Look, one 2016 candidate being prone to wild and baseless accusations is enough. Appearing on Obama campaign manager David Plouffe’s podcast, Hillary Clinton suggested that 2016 Green Party candidate Jill Stein was a “Russian asset,” that Republicans and Russians were promoting the Green Party, and ... Read More

Feminists Have Turned on Pornography

Since the sexual revolution of the 1960s, the feminist movement has sought to condemn traditional sexual ethics as repressive, misogynistic, and intolerant. As the 2010s come to a close, it might be fair to say that mainstream culture has reached the logical endpoint of this philosophy. Whereas older Americans ... Read More
PC Culture

Defiant Dave Chappelle

When Dave Chappelle’s Netflix special Sticks & Stones came out in August, the overwhelming response from critics was that it was offensive, unacceptable garbage. Inkoo Kang of Slate declared that Chappelle’s “jokes make you wince.” Garrett Martin, in the online magazine Paste, maintained that the ... Read More

‘Texodus’ Bodes Badly for Republicans

‘I am a classically trained engineer," says Representative Will Hurd, a Texas Republican, "and I firmly believe in regression to the mean." Applying a concept from statistics to the randomness of today's politics is problematic. In any case, Hurd, 42, is not waiting for the regression of our politics from the ... Read More
White House

The Impeachment Defense That Doesn’t Work

If we’ve learned anything from the last couple of weeks, it’s that the “perfect phone call” defense of Trump and Ukraine doesn’t work. As Andy and I discussed on his podcast this week, the “perfect” defense allows the Democrats to score easy points by establishing that people in the administration ... Read More