National Security & Defense

Egypt, Freedom, and the Costs of Lost American Influence

Mohamed Fahmy (left) and Baher Mohamed outside a Cairo courtroom in July. (Khaled Desouki/AFP/Getty)

Under President Mohamed Morsi, the Muslim Brotherhood turned Egypt into an economic abyss. Foreign investment collapsed, post-Mubarak democratic protections frayed, and Egypt sank into sectarianism.

Then Egypt’s Army broke free from Morsi’s leash. Its second revolution has had its costs, but today foreign investment is returning, Egypt’s economy is strengthening, and Salafi-Jihadist terrorists are on the defensive. Indeed, this weekend’s announcement of a newly discovered gas field offers new capital possibilities.

Still, Egypt has a big problem: the continuing degradation of its civil society. On Saturday, three Al Jazeera journalists, Mohamed Fahmy, Baher Mohamed, and Peter Greste, were each sentenced to three years in prison for supposed collusion with the now-banned Muslim Brotherhood. Fahmy and Mohamed are in prison, but Greste, an Australian citizen, was deported earlier this year. (The three were previously convicted, but those convictions were overturned.)

This matters. President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi wants to portray Egypt as a modern and aspirational nation. But with journalists imprisoned on cockamamie charges, the truth is abundantly clear. Egypt has a long way to go before it becomes a democracy of justice. Because — be in no doubt — these journalists are suffering injustice. Though it is now banned, the Muslim Brotherhood was (and I would say remains) a potent force in Egyptian political thought. It required the journalistic scrutiny that Fahmy, Mohamed, and Greste gave it.

The Obama administration has very little credibility with President el-Sisi.

Their plight highlights America’s inevitable role in supporting freedom and justice in the world. It’s a role that is at once unfair (no other nation else steps up) and intrinsically pure (our core values are human values). And not so long ago, the plight of these journalists — and the countless other political prisoners the Egyptian government now holds — would have been a cause that the United States could take on. As Margaret Weiss has explained, using pressure in a calibrated but forceful fashion, the Bush administration significantly advanced Egyptian civil society. Why was the Bush administration able do so? Because it had credibility with Mubarak. In contrast, the Obama administration has very little credibility with President el-Sisi. That reality is attested by Egypt’s overt realignment toward Russia, and it is a direct product of President Obama’s Middle Eastern prevarication.

Consider a key example. Egypt has sought U.S. leadership to deny the Islamic State safe harbor. Instead, President Obama has doubled down on his strategy of fundamentally inadequate half measures. Correspondingly, American influence in Egypt has perished. After all, from the perspective of el-Sisi, America is an unreliable ally.

As he sees it, President Obama’s first perceived betrayal — abandoning Mubarak in 2011 — is now matched by U.S. disinterest in ISIS’s terror campaign against Egyptian citizens (remember the February murder of Coptic Christians on the beach). And while Mubarak’s fall from power was inevitable (those who say otherwise neglect the Middle Eastern propaganda catastrophe that would have ensued had America opposed a popular revolution), President Obama’s flailing confusion at the time is remembered in Cairo. And since then, Obama has done nothing to restore confidence. As such, el-Sisi is sidestepping the Obama administration with open derision.

So while three journalists are relatively unimportant in the context of other humanitarian catastrophes — such as the Syrian refugee crisis — their suffering exemplifies the variable costs of absent American power. Ultimately, without an America that is both active and trusted in the Middle East, rulers — whether in Egypt or Saudi Arabia — have little incentive to pursue freedom and justice.

— Tom Rogan is a writer, a panelist on The McLaughlin Group, and a fellow at the Steamboat Institute. He tweets at https://twitter.com/TomRtweets. His homepage is http://www.tomroganthinks.com.

Tom Rogan is a columnist for National Review Online, a contributor to the Washington Examiner, and a former panelist on The McLaughlin Group. Email him at TRogan@McLaughlin.com

Most Popular

Culture

Cold Brew’s Insidious Hegemony

Soon, many parts of the United States will be unbearably hot. Texans and Arizonans will be able to bake cookies on their car dashboards; the garbage on the streets of New York will be especially pungent; Washington will not only figuratively be a swamp. And all across America, coffee consumers will turn their ... Read More
World

Australia’s Voters Reject Leftist Ideas

Hell hath no fury greater than left-wingers who lose an election in a surprise upset. Think Brexit in 2016. Think Trump’s victory the same year. Now add Australia. Conservative prime minister Scott Morrison shocked pollsters and pundits alike with his victory on Saturday, and the reaction has been brutal ... Read More
National Security & Defense

The Warmonger Canard

Whatever the opposite of a rush to war is — a crawl to peace, maybe — America is in the middle of one. Since May 5, when John Bolton announced the accelerated deployment of the Abraham Lincoln carrier group to the Persian Gulf in response to intelligence of a possible Iranian attack, the press has been aflame ... Read More
NR Webathon

We’ve Had Bill Barr’s Back

One of the more dismaying features of the national political debate lately is how casually and cynically Attorney General Bill Barr has been smeared. He is routinely compared to Roy Cohn on a cable-TV program that prides itself on assembling the most thoughtful and plugged-in political analysts and ... Read More
Film & TV

Game of Thrones: A Father’s Legacy Endures

Warning! If you don't want to read any spoilers from last night's series finale of Game of Thrones, stop reading. Right now. There is a lot to unpack about the Thrones finale, and I fully understand many of the criticisms I read on Twitter and elsewhere. Yes, the show was compressed. Yes, there were moments ... Read More