Politics & Policy

O’Malley: DNC Has ‘Rigged’ Primary Debates in Hillary’s Favor

(Win McNamee/Getty)

Minneapolis — Former Maryland governor Martin O’Malley effectively declared war on the Democratic establishment today, accusing a room full of liberal elites of having “rigged” the 2016 primary debates in favor of Hillary Clinton, his rival for the party’s presidential nomination.

Standing just feet from Democratic National Committee (DNC) chairwoman Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (D., FL.) at the DNC’s summer meeting in Minneapolis on Friday, O’Malley delivered a fiery speech slamming the party’s “cynical” debate schedule.

“Four debates and only four debates — we are told, not asked — before voters in our earliest states make their decision,” he said. “This sort of rigged process has never been attempted before.”

Though O’Malley is struggling to break out of the low-single digits in the polls, his speech received numerous standing ovations — particularly from the substantial contingent of Bernie Sanders supporters seated behind the DNC delegates. “Is this how the Democratic Party selects its nominee?” the former governor asked, prompting large swaths of the crowd to shout back “No!” Wasserman-Schultz appeared less-than-pleased by the criticism and the crowd’s response to it.

RELATED: Hillary Clinton Dodges Questions About Bill’s Paid Speeches, Abedin’s Conflicts of Interest at DNC Presser

In a press conference after the speech, O’Malley made the connection between the DNC’s limited debate schedule and establishment bias toward Hillary Clinton even more explicit. “What good can we possibly be doing by limiting debates, especially in this very important year?” he asked pointedly. “Who does it serve?” One reporter asked whether he was “hinting” that it may serve Clinton. “I don’t think I was hinting,” he said. “I thought I was pretty clear.”

Get Free Exclusive NR Content

“Certainly there’s a tremendous amount of people in the Democratic Party whose relationships with President Clinton and Secretary Clinton go way, way back. And I understand that,” O’Malley added. He was then asked whether those relationships may be tilting the national party toward Clinton. “Let me be very disciplined — I believe we need more debates,” he said.

“If you go back through, there has not been a time in history where the DNC has inserted itself in this process,” he continued, calling the DNC’s plan to hold the sole New Hampshire debate during the busy Christmas shopping season “too cute by half.”

#related#The former Maryland governor also promised on Friday to bring legal action against the DNC’s “exclusivity clause,” which would punish candidates who participate in unsanctioned debates. “We’ve already given them notice that we believe the exclusivity clause is not legal,” he told reporters.

O’Malley was the most strident voice slamming Democratic leadership for limiting debate, but he wasn’t alone. Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders also signaled his support for more debates, telling reporters he will continue to press Wasserman-Schultz and the rest of the DNC on the issue.

— Brendan Bordelon is a political reporter for National Review.

Most Popular

Film & TV

Knives Out Takes On the Anti-Immigration Crowd

Since the beginning of the Obama era, the Left has broadcast two contradictory messages on the subjects of race and immigration. The first is that a so-called Coalition of the Ascendant will inevitably displace white Americans as the dominant force in the country’s politics and culture. The second is that ... Read More
Film & TV

Knives Out Takes On the Anti-Immigration Crowd

Since the beginning of the Obama era, the Left has broadcast two contradictory messages on the subjects of race and immigration. The first is that a so-called Coalition of the Ascendant will inevitably displace white Americans as the dominant force in the country’s politics and culture. The second is that ... Read More
From left: Harvard University's Noah Feldman, Stanford University's Pamela Karlan, University of North Carolina's Michael Gerhardt, and George Washington University's Jonathan Turley testify before the House Judiciary Committee hearing on the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump, December 4, 2019.

The Impeachment Eye Test

To put it mildly, the 1960s were not notorious for juridical modesty. They might compare favorably, though, to Wednesday’s episode of “The Lawyer Left Does Impeachment” at the House Judiciary Committee. Oh, I have no doubt that the three progressive constitutional scholars spotlighted by Democrats yearn in ... Read More
From left: Harvard University's Noah Feldman, Stanford University's Pamela Karlan, University of North Carolina's Michael Gerhardt, and George Washington University's Jonathan Turley testify before the House Judiciary Committee hearing on the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump, December 4, 2019.

The Impeachment Eye Test

To put it mildly, the 1960s were not notorious for juridical modesty. They might compare favorably, though, to Wednesday’s episode of “The Lawyer Left Does Impeachment” at the House Judiciary Committee. Oh, I have no doubt that the three progressive constitutional scholars spotlighted by Democrats yearn in ... Read More
Culture

The Absurd Crusade against the Salvation Army

We all know some individuals who are so obviously good and kind that we are certain if anyone were to dislike them, that's all we would need to know about the person. We would immediately assume he or she is a bad person. To hate the manifestly good is a sure sign of being bad. Such is the case regarding the ... Read More
Culture

The Absurd Crusade against the Salvation Army

We all know some individuals who are so obviously good and kind that we are certain if anyone were to dislike them, that's all we would need to know about the person. We would immediately assume he or she is a bad person. To hate the manifestly good is a sure sign of being bad. Such is the case regarding the ... Read More
White House

Nancy Pelosi’s Case

Further to the post below, a couple of thoughts on Nancy Pelosi’s statement yesterday. She said this near the beginning: During the constitutional convention, James Madison, the architect of the Constitution, warned that a president might betray his trust to foreign powers which might prove fatal to the ... Read More
White House

Nancy Pelosi’s Case

Further to the post below, a couple of thoughts on Nancy Pelosi’s statement yesterday. She said this near the beginning: During the constitutional convention, James Madison, the architect of the Constitution, warned that a president might betray his trust to foreign powers which might prove fatal to the ... Read More