Politics & Policy

The Politics of Mammograms

(Xavier Gallego Morell/Getty)

Women everywhere are finding themselves confused this week by the American Cancer Society’s new breast-cancer-screening guidelines: No more routine mammograms before the age of 45 for women with an average risk of breast cancer. No more breast exams, which essentially means that if you feel a suspicious lump in the shower or I feel one on the examination table, you and I should ignore it.

Let me see if I can help you cut through the confusion. The reality is simple: This decision is bad politics, not good medicine.

A main goal under Obamacare is to try to save money by creating a one-size-fits-all health-care solution. This is not my goal, or the goal of other compassionate physicians who are practicing medicine as an art. A protuberance on a breast exam has led me to diagnose several cases of invasive breast cancer over the course of my career. I, along with many other primary- care doctors and gynecologists, encourage patients to examine their breasts regularly. A woman knows the contours of her own breasts better than anyone and can quickly become alerted to a change. Her doctor can then help decide whether the change is significant.

Mammograms are an important arrow in the doctor’s quiver. Breast-cancer screening has been proven to save lives, but follow-up imaging studies and biopsies and surgeries are expensive. So rather than focus on the real problem, which is that bad doctors overreact to a questionable abnormality on a mammogram or a breast exam and perform a knee-jerk biopsy, the ACS is throwing out the baby with the bathwater.

#share#Why is this happening? Obamacare increased the power of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), and, six years ago, this group of so-called prevention experts — concerned that mammograms were leading to too many breast biopsies — outrageously advised that a woman should have no mammograms at all until age 50. The ACS resisted, keeping its guidelines at 40 and above — until now. Many insurance companies follow these recommendations, so it is now disingenuous to tell women over 40 to speak to their doctor and then decide (as the new guidelines suggest), because it is unlikely that most insurance policies will now cover mammograms from 40 to 45.

RELATED: Planned Parenthood’s Mammogram Lie

Meanwhile, with mammograms as an essential tool in a radiologist’s arsenal, close to 40,000 cases of invasive breast cancer are successfully diagnosed every year in women aged 40 to 50 (according to the ACS’s own statistics). There are close to 4,000 deaths a year from breast cancer in this age group, with thousands more who have been saved by mammograms. In the right hands, a baseline mammogram at 40 gives a smart doctor a roadmap to follow. Mammograms are most effective when you can compare one to another and look for changes. With the latest in digital and 3D imagery, mammograms are more accurate than ever. The ACS relied on outdated data in arbitrarily changing the age to onset screening, much as the USPSTF did. Delaying screening until 45 will lead to fewer unnecessary biopsies, but also to more undiagnosed breast cancer.

#related#Mammograms are over 90 percent effective at diagnosing breast cancer early, before it leaves the breast. Having this knowledge may not always extend life, but it improves quality of life and decreases the need for side-effect-riddled chemotherapy and radiation therapy.

In the future, genetic testing will help us determine who can hold off on having a mammogram until 45 and who can’t, but we aren’t there yet. Overmanaging my screening options as a physician will lead to compromised choices that will compromise health.

As health-care costs continue to spiral upward, our government and our health -insurance companies are desperate to cut costs. But cutting too close to the bone can easily backfire. Diagnosing cancer late leads directly to more expensive treatments. This isn’t good medicine, even if these treatments sometimes manage to keep you alive.

– Marc Siegel, M.D., is a professor of medicine and medical director of Doctor Radio at NYU Langone Medical Center. He is a Fox News medical correspondent.

 

 

Marc Siegel is a professor of medicine and the medical director of Doctor Radio at NYU Langone Medical Center. He is also a Fox News medical correspondent.

Most Popular

White House

The Mueller Report Should Shock Our Conscience

I've finished reading the entire Mueller report, and I must confess that even as a longtime, quite open critic of Donald Trump, I was surprised at the sheer scope, scale, and brazenness of the lies, falsehoods, and misdirections detailed by the Special Counsel's Office. We've become accustomed to Trump making up ... Read More
World

What’s So Great about Western Civilization

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader (Redacted: Harm to Ongoing Matter), One of the things I tell new parents is something that was told to me when my daughter still had that ... Read More
Film & TV

Jesus Is Not the Joker

Actors love to think they can play anything, but the job of any half-decent filmmaker is to tell them when they’re not right for a part. If the Rock wants to play Kurt Cobain, try to talk him out of it. Adam Sandler as King Lear is not a great match. And then there’s Joaquin Phoenix. He’s playing Jesus ... Read More
Sports

Screw York Yankees

You are dead to me. You are a collection of Fredos. The cock has crowed, you pathetic sniveling jerks. The team I have rooted for since 1965, when I first visited the House that Ruth Built, where I hawked peanuts and ice cream a lifetime ago, watched countless games (Guidry striking out 18!), has gotten so ... Read More
White House

The Problem with the Mueller Report

So much for collusion. The media conversation has now officially moved on from the obsession of the last two years to obstruction of justice. That’s because the first volume of the voluminous Mueller report, the half devoted to what was supposed to be the underlying crime of a Trump conspiracy with Russia, ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Trump Can’t Cry ‘No Fair’

If I may jump in, I take Charlie’s point and I think he’s largely correct. I also think David is correct. There’s not that much of a contradiction in that because I think to some extent they’re talking about different things. And this reflects a larger frustration I have with many of the ... Read More