Politics & Policy

New E-mails Released Highlight Clinton’s Post-Concussion Confusion

Clinton testifies on Capitol Hill, January 23, 2013. (Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty)

New Hillary Clinton e-mails released by the State Department on Monday show that the secretary of state was often confused about and unfamiliar with State Department activity in the wake of a serious concussion, relying on her staff to explain department policy and even help her remember her own actions.

Clinton suffered a severe fall in early December 2012, which gave her a concussion and put her in the hospital for several weeks, postponing her planned congressional testimony on her response to the Benghazi attacks. She returned to work on January 7, 2013, when State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said she was “fully recovered.” But an e-mail released by Judicial Watch earlier this week showed top aide Huma Abedin admitting on January 26 that Clinton was “often confused.”

The latest e-mails further underscore that confusion. On January 27, Clinton sent an e-mail to top aide Cheryl Mills and State Department undersecretary Patrick Kennedy. “The Brits have just called for their citizens to leave Somalia. What’s our position?” she asked. Kennedy gently replied that the American government “[has] a long-time published travel warning against all travel to Somalia. It was last update [sic] on 12/26/12.”

It was the second time in as many days that Kennedy had to explain State Department policies to Clinton. In a January 25, 2013 e-mail titled “Benghazi,” she appeared unaware that the department was warning Americans not to travel to the embattled Libyan city. “Since the Brits, Germans and Dutch have told their citizens to leave Benghazi, why aren’t we doing the same?” she asked her top staff, citing a report from NPR. Kennedy explained that the department had already told American citizens not to travel to Benghazi on January 2 — a warning they had reiterated on January 24, just one day before her e-mail.

At times, Clinton had to turn to her staff to help her remember her own actions. The secretary of state seemed unable to recall whether she’d replied to a December 31, 2012, e-mail from Lynn Forester de Rothschild, who wished her a speedy recovery. “Did I respond yet?” Clinton asked aide Robert Russo on January 10, 2013. Russo replied that yes, she’d written back immediately to the entire Rothschild family in December, and had written another e-mail specifically to Lynn “earlier this week.”

Clinton wrote the e-mails during the same time period as her January 23, 2013, Benghazi testimony, when she clashed with members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on whether the attacks were caused by an anti-Islamic YouTube video. “What difference, at this point, does it make?” she asked Republican senators at the time.

With today’s document dump of 7,800 pages, the State Department says it has now released 66 percent of e-mails retained on Hillary Clinton’s private server and turned over to the federal government. A judge has given the department until January 31 to release all of the e-mails.

—Brendan Bordelon is a political reporter for National Review Online.

#share#

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Demagoguery Is Not Leadership

The government of Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern in New Zealand has, with the support of the opposition, decided to enact fundamental changes in the nation’s firearms laws less than a week after the massacre at two Christchurch mosques. This is the opposite of leadership. It is also an example of why ... Read More
White House

The Media’s Disgrace

There will soon enough be an effort to memory-hole it, but the media coverage of the Russia investigation was abysmal and self-discrediting — obsessive and hysterical, often suggesting that the smoking gun was right around the corner, sometimes supporting its hoped-for result with erroneous, too-good-to-check ... Read More
Politics & Policy

What Was Trump So Annoyed About?

One of the stranger arguments that I heard throughout the Mueller saga -- and am hearing today, now that it's turned out to be a dud -- is that Donald Trump's irritation with the process was unreasonable and counterproductive. This tweet, from CNN's Chris Cilizza, is a nice illustration of the genre: Donald ... Read More
White House

Our Long National Hysteria 

Our long national hysteria may not be over, but at least it should — by rights — be diminished. Robert Mueller delivered his long-awaited report on Friday, and Attorney General William Barr just released his summary of the findings. They completely vindicate President Trump regarding the allegation that ... Read More