Politics & Policy

A Report Card on the Presidential Candidates

Clinton campaigns in Salem, N.H. (Darren McCollester/Getty)

We are just weeks away from the first 2016 presidential caucuses and primaries, but at least on the Republican side of the aisle there are millions of voters just like me: thoroughly undecided.

Every candidate has virtues and certainly they all have flaws. The candidates most ideologically in line with a free market/limited government philosophy, often seem to lack the political skills or that crucial X factor of “likability” that swung the last two elections in President Obama’s direction and the two before that in George W. Bush’s favor. ‎How does one weigh a candidate’s fealty to the core conservative principles we care most about (needed to govern effectively) with electability (necessary to govern at all)?

This calculus is for all voters to decide for themselves, but at least there is now an online tool to help people make more informed judgments about each candidate’s ‎assets and liabilities.

A new group on the political landscape, Leadership Project for America, offers just that. LPA consists of leading political and policy experts on the right. (For full disclosure, I am proud to be one of many advisers to LPA.) The LPA has created a one of a kind online Leadership Matrix. This matrix evaluates all the presidential candidates (Republicans and Democrats) on vital criteria — key aspects of diplomacy and policy, personal character and principled leadership, as well as support for key issues that are distinctly and uniquely American, such as free enterprise, strong national security, and American exceptionalism.

#related#All of the current Republican and Democratic candidates are graded ‎on the LPA report card at leadershippac.org. Some of the criteria are objective — such as how much spending they have voted for in Congress or what taxes they have supported. Some of the criteria are subjective, such as effective leadership skills. Everyone will quibble with the scores (including the candidates themselves). But this is still the most useful report card out there.

With a few exceptions, all the Republicans do well with high or above-average grades. Alas, all of the Democrats, including Hillary, are crowded on the other side of the spectrum.

I don’t agree with all the grades. Trump deserves far better than an F and Rand Paul much better than a C, but LPA is a tough grader.

#share#Religious conservatives may complain that the grading is skewed toward economic, not values issues. This is partly by design. One of the founders of LPA, Peter Morse, notes that “the free market economic issues are what bind us all together as a party.” But there are metrics on the values issues too. Under the category ‎”American Exceptionalism,” candidates are scored based on their philosophical “belief in community, opportunity, family, faith.”

Every voter — or at least every undecided voter — should check out the LPA matrix. It’s user friendly and a quick read. And it’s worth the time given that this is one the biggest decisions we will ever make for our country.

Candidate                  Grade

Jeb Bush                      B+

Ben Carson                  B-

Chris Christie               D

Hillary Clinton             F

Ted Cruz                      B

Carly Fiorina                B-

Lindsey Graham          C+

Mike Huckabee            D

John Kasich                 C+

Martin O’Malley          F

Rand Paul                     C

Marco Rubio                A-

Bernie Sanders             F

Rick Santorum             C+

Donald Trump              F

Source: Leadershippac.org

Stephen Moore is an economic consultant with Freedom Works and served as a senior economic adviser to the Trump campaign. His new book with Arthur Laffer is Trumponomics: Inside the America First Strategy to Revive the Economy.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Elizabeth Warren Is Not Honest

If you want to run for office, political consultants will hammer away at one point: Tell stories. People respond to stories. We’ve been a story-telling species since our fur-clad ancestors gathered around campfires. Don’t cite statistics. No one can remember statistics. Make it human. Make it relatable. ... Read More
National Review


Today is my last day at National Review. It's an incredibly bittersweet moment. While I've only worked full-time since May, 2015, I've contributed posts and pieces for over fifteen years. NR was the first national platform to publish my work, and now -- thousands of posts and more than a million words later -- I ... Read More
White House

More Evidence the Guardrails Are Gone

At the end of last month, just as the news of the Ukraine scandal started dominating the news cycle, I argued that we're seeing evidence that the guardrails that staff had placed around Donald Trump's worst instincts were in the process of breaking down. When Trump's staff was at its best, it was possible to draw ... Read More
Economy & Business

Andrew Yang, Snake Oil Salesman

Andrew Yang, the tech entrepreneur and gadfly, has definitely cleared the bar for a successful cause candidate. Not only has he exceeded expectations for his polling and fundraising, not only has he developed a cult following, not only has he got people talking about his signature idea, the universal basic ... Read More

Feminists Have Turned on Pornography

Since the sexual revolution of the 1960s, the feminist movement has sought to condemn traditional sexual ethics as repressive, misogynistic, and intolerant. As the 2010s come to a close, it might be fair to say that mainstream culture has reached the logical endpoint of this philosophy. Whereas older Americans ... Read More
White House

The Impeachment Defense That Doesn’t Work

If we’ve learned anything from the last couple of weeks, it’s that the “perfect phone call” defense of Trump and Ukraine doesn’t work. As Andy and I discussed on his podcast this week, the “perfect” defense allows the Democrats to score easy points by establishing that people in the administration ... Read More