Politics & Policy

What If Trump Wins?

(Bill Pugliano/Getty)

There are many potential outcomes to a Donald Trump GOP nomination. And every one of them is a disaster for conservatives.

The fact is, Trump fans will not be placated — not if they lose, and definitely not if they win. Unless unforeseen events alter the dynamics of American politics, it’s difficult to imagine conventional Republicans and Trump fans inhabiting the same space after this is all done. Me? I look forward to loathing three major political parties.

Now, if Trump prevails in the primaries, principled small-government conservatives (however many are left) will be faced with a distasteful choice: They can either back the nominee, picked fairly by the rank-and-file of the party, or they can disregard party politics and actively try and sink him.

If they support Trump? A disaster. Those who decide to endorse Trump because of partisan loyalty will also be supporting a 45 percent tariff on Chinese goods, policies barring immigrants based purely on religion, and whatever other half-baked policy ideas spring from Trump’s mind. And they should be really comfortable with Trumpism (and, with that, his many liberal positions) because they’ll be spending the rest of their careers justifying the support. For those who think they can embrace neutrality to escape this fight, their silence will be treated as tacit endorsement by liberals and treachery by Trump’s fans. It’s conceivable that a number of local races will suffer in these intraparty skirmishes, hurting conservatives in state races and probably Congress.

EDITORIAL: Against Trump

If they fight Trump? A disaster. For those who decide to actively oppose Trump — and you assume many factions on the right would — the prospects are not much better. There’s no modern precedent for a party’s establishment undercutting its nominee, so it’s improbable the Republican party would participate in torpedoing Trump. The time for that has passed. (One day, perhaps, Reince Priebus will explain how he let a populist liberal reality-show host win a major party’s nomination.)

More distressing, at least for some of us, is the prospect that Trump’s outlook will turn out to be more popular than anyone imagines. Maybe a flood of candidates will begin aping his populism and succeed. Maybe Trump begins to transform American discourse into something more closely resembling European politics, where nationalists and socialists argue about who should run the state apparatus.

#share#Many conservatives will undoubtedly toy with the idea of running a third-party candidate (not as easy as it sounds, when you consider the logistics and the factional nature of Republicans today), which would be likely only to spoil the GOP nominee’s prospects and challenge his risible claim to conservatism.

RELATED: Donald Trump: Thin-Skinned Tyrant

The important question for conservatives is: Would they rather have a Republican president with views antithetical to their own, or Hillary Clinton as president? Would they rather have a Republican who might cause irreparable damage to their brand, or Bernie Sanders? Would they want a GOP monopoly in D.C., led by Trump, or continue with gridlock as the purer opposition party? We can imagine, though, that helping put Clinton (or Sanders) in the White House would blow up any hope of a healthy right-of-center consensus for many years to come.

If Trump loses? A disaster. If conservative intellectuals and many of their institutions and leaders fail to back the nominee, Trump’s fans will hold those elites culpable for the loss, further feeding the frustrations that had alienated them in the first place. The idea that a bunch of know-it-alls can undermine the democratic process will only generate more anger and paranoia. Do Trump boosters seem like the sort of group that will embrace rapprochement and constructive change after having an election stolen from them?

#related#Even more terrifying for many of us is the prospect of a successful Trump presidency. Even without Congress, as Obama has shown, a president can accomplish many destructive things — though probably not enough to satisfy Trump’s supporters, who will undoubtedly be disappointed. Presidents can’t just slap huge tariffs on other countries without Congress, and they can’t make Mexico pay for border fences, nor take oil from countries in the Middle East, nor deport 13 million immigrants here illegally. When this becomes evident, I suspect his fans will still blame the establishment for its lack of willpower, support, and patriotism.

And, of course, finally, Trump might lose the GOP nomination (I still don’t believe he’ll win, but I’m cognizant of the fact that this is probably wishful thinking). Then, it’s likely that the Republican party will go back to business as usual. Which is a disaster of a whole different kind.

— David Harsanyi is a senior editor at The Federalist and the author of The People Have Spoken (and They Are Wrong): The Case Against Democracy. Follow him on Twitter @davidharsanyi. © 2016 Creators.com

David Harsanyi — David Harsanyi is a senior editor of the Federalist and the author of First Freedom: A Ride through America’s Enduring History with the Gun, From the Revolution to Today

Most Popular


Two Truth-Tellers, Brave as Hell

Yesterday, the Human Rights Foundation hosted an event they called “PutinCon” -- a conference devoted to the Russian “president,” Vladimir Putin: his rise and his deeds, both at home and abroad. Participating were both Russians and well-wishing foreigners. It was, above all, a day of truth-telling -- a ... Read More
Economy & Business

The Swamp: Navarro Nucor Edition

The Wall Street Journal has a story today about the ties between President Trump's trade adviser, Peter Navarro, and the biggest steel company in the U.S. -- Nucor Corp. It is particularly interesting in light of the stiff steel tariffs successfully pushed by Navarro, which he championed ever since he joined the ... Read More


EMPIRICAL   As I can fathom neither endlessness nor the miracle work of deities, I hypothesize, assume, and guess.   The fact that I love you and you love me is all I can prove and proves me. — This poem appears in the April 2 print issue of National Review. Read More
Politics & Policy

Rolling Back Dodd-Frank

The Senate on Wednesday passed a bill that would roll back parts of Dodd-Frank. The vote was 67–31, with 17 members of the Democratic caucus breaking party lines. If the legislation passes the House and is signed, it will be the largest change to the controversial financial-reform package since it became law in ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Samantha Power Regrets

‘I’ve had a lot of bad ideas in my life,” former U.N. ambassador Samantha Power tells Politico. “Though none as immortalized as that one.” Wow. It’s a major concession. And what might “that one” be? Not standing idly by in the White House while Iranians protested a fixed election in 2009, then ... Read More