Politics & Policy

No, Women Are Not ‘Punished’ for Having Abortions

Abortion activists at the Supreme Court, January 22, 2016. (Alex Wong/Getty)

Yesterday Donald Trump did what he does best: opened his mouth and inserted his foot. In an interview with Chris Matthews, he said that women who receive abortions should face “some sort of punishment” if the practice is made illegal. He reversed himself hours later, but in the meantime the radical pro-abortion Left seized on his comments and did what they do best: distorting the English language and common sense to paint an apocalyptic picture of the plight of women in America today.

It was as if abortion high command had given radical feminist writers a directive: Tell America that women are already punished for seeking abortions. The Nation’s Zoë Carpenter writes, “Women Are Already Punished for Trying to End Their Pregnancies.” Slate’s Christina Cauterucci says, “Good News, Donald Trump! Women Are Already Punished for Seeking Abortions.” Then there’s the Daily Beast’s Samantha Allen with her original take: “Hey Trump: Women Are Already Punished for Abortion.” And let’s not exclude the Huffington Post’s Samantha Lachman: “Donald Trump Said Women Should Be Punished for Getting Abortions. They Already Are.”

The articles are as original as their headlines. Women are “punished” because they have to drive farther than they’d like. Or because they’re subject to parental notification laws and waiting periods. They’re “punished” by protesters and ultrasounds. They’re even “punished” by safety measures that require abortionists to have admitting privileges at local hospitals and abortion clinics to keep to the same standards as ambulatory surgical centers. My favorite is Lachman’s assertion that women are punished when states ban abortion by telemedicine.

These writers aren’t making a serious argument. They’re simply following the standard leftist playbook by redefining words in service of shrieking hyperbole. To “punish” typically means to make “someone suffer for a crime or for bad behavior.” But if it serves a woman’s right to kill her unborn child, the Left will happily stretch “punishment” to include any minor inconvenience.

EDITORIAL: Trump’s Abortion Blunder

This rhetorical device is a crowd-pleaser on leftist social media, and it’s a great way to demonize your opponents. If you’re pro-life, you’re “punishing” women. Or, to apply the tried-and-true formula, you’re against “women’s health.” We see similar tactics on multiple fronts. If you’re a Christian who believes marriage is the union of one man and one woman, you’re a “homophobe.” If you’re a conservative who believes that a nation should have controlled borders or that people should be judged by the content of their character and not the color of their skin, then you’re a “racist.”

#share#Heaven forbid that one apply the same reasoning to the Left. Advocating expansive gun control isn’t “punishing” law-abiding citizens, it’s just “common sense.” Seeking to exclude Christian groups from college campuses isn’t evidence of bigotry but rather a sign of tolerance. The massive and expanding regulatory state isn’t punishing business, it’s protecting the public.

For the Left, words are a mere tool, used to manipulate those suckers who believe they have actual meaning. When an ordinary person sees the word “punish,” they tend to think there’s, well, actual punishment going on. But the public is slowly growing wise to the game. Cynicism rules the land, and – Trump’s persistent success aside – people tend to believe only those who’ve earned their trust.

RELATED: It’s Time for Conservatives to Blackball Donald Trump

So let me conclude with a few words used clearly and properly. Yes, some women are inconvenienced in their quest for an abortion, but not so inconvenienced as to prevent abortionists from plying their deadly trade more than 700,000 times per year. No, women are not punished, and neither are their unborn children. To argue otherwise is to imply that an aborted fetus is guilty of some transgression, when in fact it’s the opposite: the innocent fetus is simply killed.

That’s abortion in America. Women are sometimes inconvenienced, the child is always killed, and the feminist Left wants both more convenience and more killing. So long as we allow this regime to continue, God may show us what punishment truly means.

— David French is an attorney, and a staff writer at National Review.

Most Popular

Film & TV

The Manly Appeal of Ford v Ferrari

There used to be a lot of overlap between what we think of as a Hollywood studio picture (designed to earn money) and an awards movie (designed to fill the trophy case, usually with an accompanying loss of money). Ford v Ferrari is a glorious throwback to the era when big stars did quality movies about actual ... Read More
Politics & Policy

ABC Chief Political Analyst: GOP Rep. Stefanik a ‘Perfect Example’ of the Failures of Electing Someone ‘Because They Are a Woman’

Matthew Dowd, chief political analyst for ABC News, suggested that Representative Elise Stefanik (R., N.Y.) was elected due to her gender after taking issue with Stefanik's line of questioning during the first public impeachment hearing on Wednesday. “Elise Stefanik is a perfect example of why just electing ... Read More
White House

Trump vs. the ‘Policy Community’

When it comes to Russia, I am with what Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman calls the American “policy community.” Vindman, of course, is one of the House Democrats’ star impeachment witnesses. His haughtiness in proclaiming the policy community and his membership in it grates, throughout his 340-page ... Read More
Law & the Courts

DACA’s Day in Court

When President Obama unilaterally changed immigration policy after repeatedly and correctly insisting that he lacked the constitutional power to do it, he said that congressional inaction had forced his hand. In the case of his first major unilateral move — “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals,” which ... Read More
White House

Impeachment and the Broken Truce

The contradiction at the center of American politics in Anno Domini 2019 is this: The ruling class does not rule. The impeachment dog-and-pony show in Washington this week is not about how Donald Trump has comported himself as president (grotesquely) any more than early convulsions were about refreshed ... Read More

A Preposterous Review

A   Georgetown University professor named Charles King has reviewed my new book The Case for Nationalism for Foreign Affairs, and his review is a train wreck. It is worth dwelling on, not only because the review contains most of the lines of attack against my book, but because it is extraordinarily shoddy and ... Read More