Politics & Policy

Capitulation on Religious-Liberty Laws Is Shameful and Shortsighted

(Dreamstime)

One year after a coalition of corporations and progressive activists bullied Indiana governor Mike Pence into “clarifying” an already perfectly transparent, and defensible, religious-freedom law in Indiana, Georgia and North Carolina are under siege.

In Georgia, a coalition of liberal corporations — including Apple, Disney, Salesforce.com, and the NFL — successfully placed immense pressure on Governor Nathan Deal to veto a religious-liberty bill that would have provided the most modest of protections for religious liberty: protecting the right of clergy to perform only those marriages consistent with the tenets of their faith, protecting the right of narrowly defined faith-based institutions to hire and fire based on religious belief and practice, and protecting the free-exercise rights of individuals so long as they didn’t engage in “invidious discrimination” in violation of state and federal law.

In North Carolina, a similar coalition arrived after the legislature passed and Governor Pat McCrory signed into law a religious-freedom statute. So they’re trying to force repeal. The North Carolina law mandates that individuals using single-sex, multiple-occupancy bathrooms must do so according to the gender identified on their birth certificate, and it establishes a uniform state non-discrimination law, effectively barring local municipalities from passing the expansive non-discrimination regulations that most often conflict with religious freedom and rights of conscience. Not only have multiple large corporations attacked the North Carolina law, the state’s Democratic attorney general has indicated that he won’t defend it against any legal challenges.

Georgia and North Carolina are only the latest states attempting to strengthen religious believers’ First Amendment rights amid the cultural and legal sea change that has resulted in — to consider just a few examples — Christian student groups being forced to open themselves to non-Christian leadership or face expulsion from campus; Christian adoption agencies being forced to close unless they’re willing to place children with same-sex couples; and Christian bakers, florists, and photographers being forced to lend their artistic talents to help celebrate gay weddings.

#share#Obviously, protecting religious liberty does not mean denying gay people their newly found right to marriage or gay couples the ability to adopt. It doesn’t mean prohibiting gay individuals from purchasing wedding cakes or barring gay students from forming clubs that express their point of view. But weddings and adoptions are available without coercing religious participation. Protecting religious liberty merely means protecting and accommodating the right of religious dissent.

Alas, religious dissent is unacceptable to progressives, who now see the law as an instrument of state-enforced morality, where any person who seeks to enter the marketplace (or, at colleges, the marketplace of ideas) has to conform or leave.

With each new capitulation, progressives grow bolder and conservatives grow more bitter.

Meanwhile, progressive corporate scolds mount their pressure campaigns from a precarious moral position. Many of them — Apple, Disney, and Salesforce.com — threaten economic sanctions against American states while at the same time operating (and investing billions) in nations like the People’s Republic of China, which systematically oppresses its citizens, forcing abortions, persecuting religious believers, and suppressing dissent. Yet again and again Republican governors capitulate, vetoing or forcing modifications to religious-liberty bills often passed with overwhelming legislative majorities.

With each new capitulation, progressives grow bolder and conservatives grow more bitter. Elected officials are abandoning their independent duty to protect the constitutional rights of the citizenry, punting all conflicts to a liberal judiciary that has repeatedly proven hostile to the faithful. This is not leadership.

It is now the responsibility of conservative legislators to try again — to send more bills to their governors’ desks — and it is the responsibility of the electorate to make sure that their voices matter more than Tim Cook’s or Roger Goodell’s. Progressive corporations should not be permitted to govern conservative states.

The Editors comprise the senior editorial staff of the National Review magazine and website.

Most Popular

White House

The Mueller Report Should Shock Our Conscience

I've finished reading the entire Mueller report, and I must confess that even as a longtime, quite open critic of Donald Trump, I was surprised at the sheer scope, scale, and brazenness of the lies, falsehoods, and misdirections detailed by the Special Counsel's Office. We've become accustomed to Trump making up ... Read More
World

What’s So Great about Western Civilization

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader (Redacted: Harm to Ongoing Matter), One of the things I tell new parents is something that was told to me when my daughter still had that ... Read More
White House

The Problem with the Mueller Report

So much for collusion. The media conversation has now officially moved on from the obsession of the last two years to obstruction of justice. That’s because the first volume of the voluminous Mueller report, the half devoted to what was supposed to be the underlying crime of a Trump conspiracy with Russia, ... Read More
Sports

Screw York Yankees

You are dead to me. You are a collection of Fredos. The cock has crowed, you pathetic sniveling jerks. The team I have rooted for since 1965, when I first visited the House that Ruth Built, where I hawked peanuts and ice cream a lifetime ago, watched countless games (Guidry striking out 18!), has gotten so ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Trump Can’t Cry ‘No Fair’

If I may jump in, I take Charlie’s point and I think he’s largely correct. I also think David is correct. There’s not that much of a contradiction in that because I think to some extent they’re talking about different things. And this reflects a larger frustration I have with many of the ... Read More