Politics & Policy

On to Cleveland: The Republican Nomination Will Be Decided at the Convention

State signs at the 2012 Republican covention. (Robyn Beck/AFP/Getty)

The race for the Republican nomination is going to the convention. It must sound strange to hear that — given that this perennial contingency never gets past political-nerd fan fiction. It certainly feels strange to write it. But that’s where we’re headed. While the networks will quickly declare Trump the winner tonight in most (if not all) Super Tuesday states, the math is plain to see. At the current trajectory, no one — not Trump, not Rubio, not Cruz — will secure the necessary delegates to win the nomination outright. Nor, given the calculus, does anyone have any incentive to drop out. The very Mexican standoff that has enabled Trump thus far is likely to trigger a convention-floor failsafe. Somewhere John Nash is smiling.

Sure, things could change. Every candidate could internalize the drumbeat of news declaring Trump unstoppable and inevitable and simply roll over. The candidates could pull back from the nascent Trump onslaught and return exclusively to internecine warfare among themselves. Trump’s rumored decision to boycott future debates could be the most successful Jedi mind trick of all time. But amid the #NeverTrump sentiments mobilizing online and the third-party barrage about to be unleashed on the Donald on airwaves across the country, that all seems unlikely. The incentives for the not-Trump candidates to stay in the race actually increase as time goes on, provided the campaigns can marshal the resources to do so.

So where does that leave us? When the dust settles on the wee hours of Wednesday morning, look past the state-by-state check marks and keep an eye on the delegate scoreboard. The only number that matters is 1,237. Short of that threshold we remain in a zero-gravity environment. All of the pseudo-historical trivia regarding various “nevers” are derived from a uselessly small sample of open GOP primary contests, none bearing even a passing resemblance to the current set of circumstances.

While some will cite McCain and Romney as instances where seemingly implacable opposition was quickly mollified, the resistance to Trump runs far broader and deeper than any front-runner before him. Never before has a favorite for the nomination faced well-funded challengers enjoying the overwhelming aggregate support of movement conservatives and party regulars who make up the broader delegation. Even the considerable fear and antipathy toward Hillary Clinton may be insufficient to rally the GOP faithful around Trump when you consider what her machine is already gearing up to do to him.

#share#The media pressure to bow to Trump will be intense. The Donald will kick and scream about how the party is treating him unfairly. He will threaten to mount a third-party bid and poison the well behind him. The party establishment will be pilloried for not lining up behind the delegate leader as they urged others to do in the past. But whatever divisiveness a contested convention might bring, whatever fissures within the party it might deepen, there would be nothing more destructive to the GOP than a Trump nomination. If anything, taking this to the convention and fighting until the bitter end is a necessary battle for the soul of the party of Lincoln and the movement it has come to be associated with. There can be no catharsis unless the resistance is fierce. And leaving aside the existential crisis the party is grappling with, the practical on-the-ground implications might be even starker.

There would be nothing more destructive to the GOP than a Trump nomination.

Trump would lose the Senate for the GOP — that is a virtual certainty. The air war has already begun. He would expose the House conference to deep losses. And he would devastate the party in the very places it has been the strongest over the past six years, in the state legislatures. Whatever pockets of strength Trump might enjoy, any gains would be swamped by the inevitable revolt in the swing suburbs, nuking the GOP bench and leading to a Clinton-Schumer partnership that would enable the very immigration amnesty his supporters profess to be railing against.

#related#So we’re going to Cleveland. The only question is what happens after the first ballot. The race will be on to master arcane procedure, woo delegates, and mine the lessons of 1976 for whatever nuggets of precedent might be gleaned. Trump will beat his chest and demand the GOP crown him as the likely plurality leader. Cruz and Rubio will jostle for position in the interim and look to secure friendly delegates. Kasich will use the Ohio Republican Party apparatus to gain whatever edge he can as governor of the host state. Rules will be challenged and changed to great fanfare, the most notable being Rule 40, which now requires candidates to secure a majority of delegates in no less than eight states. Bedlam is pretty much assured. On the second ballot, more than half of convention delegates are unbound. By the third, nearly 80 percent are free agents.

What happens in the voting booths will be mere political prologue, as the electoral universe shrinks to 2,472. Barring some under-the-radar delegate recruitment and selection effort, few of these individuals will have any particular loyalty to Donald Trump, creating a big opening for the remaining field. The ensuing political mergers and acquisitions will be complex and fascinating. Strange bedfellows will emerge. And all this because on the convention floor, stump speeches and messaging go out the window — at that point, it will all be about the art of the deal.

Most Popular


Two Truth-Tellers, Brave as Hell

Yesterday, the Human Rights Foundation hosted an event they called “PutinCon” -- a conference devoted to the Russian “president,” Vladimir Putin: his rise and his deeds, both at home and abroad. Participating were both Russians and well-wishing foreigners. It was, above all, a day of truth-telling -- a ... Read More
Economy & Business

The Swamp: Navarro Nucor Edition

The Wall Street Journal has a story today about the ties between President Trump's trade adviser, Peter Navarro, and the biggest steel company in the U.S. -- Nucor Corp. It is particularly interesting in light of the stiff steel tariffs successfully pushed by Navarro, which he championed ever since he joined the ... Read More


EMPIRICAL   As I can fathom neither endlessness nor the miracle work of deities, I hypothesize, assume, and guess.   The fact that I love you and you love me is all I can prove and proves me. — This poem appears in the April 2 print issue of National Review. Read More
Politics & Policy

Rolling Back Dodd-Frank

The Senate on Wednesday passed a bill that would roll back parts of Dodd-Frank. The vote was 67–31, with 17 members of the Democratic caucus breaking party lines. If the legislation passes the House and is signed, it will be the largest change to the controversial financial-reform package since it became law in ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Samantha Power Regrets

‘I’ve had a lot of bad ideas in my life,” former U.N. ambassador Samantha Power tells Politico. “Though none as immortalized as that one.” Wow. It’s a major concession. And what might “that one” be? Not standing idly by in the White House while Iranians protested a fixed election in 2009, then ... Read More