Politics & Policy

How to Beat the Lawless Left

(Max Herman/Dreamstime)
A way for conservatives to level the playing field.

This week, the Supreme Court heard arguments in a case brought by 26 states against President Obama’s executive orders more or less legalizing large groups of illegal aliens.

The seriousness of the case has nothing to do with the virtues of deporting versus accommodating people who are here illegally. Mostly, it’s a question of whether we are to accept a president’s power to personally rewrite laws. But it’s also an important test case concerning the new wave of old-fashioned government activists, who believe that doing the right thing, as they see it, is more important than following the law.

You see this in the president’s executive rewriting of laws enacted by Congress. You see it in the IRS’s targeting conservative groups, and the State Department’s obstructing the investigation of Hillary’s server. You see it in Hillary’s having the server in the first place. You see it in the harassment of Scott Walker supporters in Wisconsin, where a Milwaukee district attorney used flimsy pretexts to authorize pre-dawn raids of his political enemies: Armed police broke down doors with battering rams, ransacked homes, confiscated phones and computers and warned residents not to tell anyone, for the greater good of beating Scott Walker in a recall election. Two weeks ago, a similar raid was evidently authorized by California attorney general (and Democratic Senate candidate) Kamala Harris, in retaliation for a private citizen’s having filmed employees of Planned Parenthood discussing the sale of fetal organs. Though that may have been both for the greater good and because Planned Parenthood has donated a huge amount of money to Miss Harris’s political campaigns.

Of course, there are corrupt Republicans too — but at least breaking the law isn’t part of the Republican party platform. Whereas both Democratic presidential candidates openly support sanctuary cities.

Sanctuary cities are cities that ignore, violate, and obstruct federal and state law.

Sanctuary cities are cities that ignore, violate, and obstruct federal and state law. Specifically, immigration law. But it really doesn’t matter what sort of laws they’re ignoring — what matters it that they are subverting democracy to advance their own agendas. And with the full support of one of the country’s major parties.

So maybe it’s time for a conservative rebuttal. What if conservative states and cities, or towns and counties, started declaring themselves sanctuary cities for heterosexual-only marriage, or for fetuses. For the record: This is not something conservatives should do. But I bet it would get the Justice Department to start taking sanctuary cities seriously. Someone in Congress might want to point that out.

And what if a conservative county in a liberal state declared itself a sanctuary for people who like to drive over 80 mph, or smoke in public, or not wear helmets, or own high-capacity magazines or silencers, or set off fireworks. For the record, I think that would be a fantastic idea. Because if liberals are going to break the law to promote liberalism, conservatives can level the playing field and start promoting freedom.

Write your mayor.

Josh Gelernter — Josh Gelernter is a former columnist for NRO, and a frequent contributor to The Weekly Standard.

Most Popular

Elections

Put Up or Shut Up on These Accusations, Hillary

Look, one 2016 candidate being prone to wild and baseless accusations is enough. Appearing on Obama campaign manager David Plouffe’s podcast, Hillary Clinton suggested that 2016 Green Party candidate Jill Stein was a “Russian asset,” that Republicans and Russians were promoting the Green Party, and ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Elizabeth Warren Is Not Honest

If you want to run for office, political consultants will hammer away at one point: Tell stories. People respond to stories. We’ve been a story-telling species since our fur-clad ancestors gathered around campfires. Don’t cite statistics. No one can remember statistics. Make it human. Make it relatable. ... Read More
National Review

Farewell

Today is my last day at National Review. It's an incredibly bittersweet moment. While I've only worked full-time since May, 2015, I've contributed posts and pieces for over fifteen years. NR was the first national platform to publish my work, and now -- thousands of posts and more than a million words later -- I ... Read More
Culture

Feminists Have Turned on Pornography

Since the sexual revolution of the 1960s, the feminist movement has sought to condemn traditional sexual ethics as repressive, misogynistic, and intolerant. As the 2010s come to a close, it might be fair to say that mainstream culture has reached the logical endpoint of this philosophy. Whereas older Americans ... Read More
Economy & Business

Andrew Yang, Snake Oil Salesman

Andrew Yang, the tech entrepreneur and gadfly, has definitely cleared the bar for a successful cause candidate. Not only has he exceeded expectations for his polling and fundraising, not only has he developed a cult following, not only has he got people talking about his signature idea, the universal basic ... Read More
White House

The Impeachment Defense That Doesn’t Work

If we’ve learned anything from the last couple of weeks, it’s that the “perfect phone call” defense of Trump and Ukraine doesn’t work. As Andy and I discussed on his podcast this week, the “perfect” defense allows the Democrats to score easy points by establishing that people in the administration ... Read More
Elections

Democrats Think They Can Win without You

A  few days ago, Ericka Anderson, an old friend of National Review, popped up in the pages of the New York Times lamenting that “the Democratic presidential field neglects abundant pools of potential Democrat converts, leaving persuadable audiences — like independents and Trump-averse, anti-abortion ... Read More
PC Culture

Defiant Dave Chappelle

When Dave Chappelle’s Netflix special Sticks & Stones came out in August, the overwhelming response from critics was that it was offensive, unacceptable garbage. Inkoo Kang of Slate declared that Chappelle’s “jokes make you wince.” Garrett Martin, in the online magazine Paste, maintained that the ... Read More