National Security & Defense

Restore America’s Alliance with Saudi Arabia

President Obama visits Saudi Arabia in 2009. (Pete Souza/White House/Flickr)

Foreign leaders believe President Obama is an arrogant and unreliable ally. Conversely, President Obama believes he’s on an inexorable path toward history-book glory. But one striking facet of the president’s foreign policy is the reciprocal disdain now defining America’s relationships in the Middle East. Consider Saudi Arabia. Visiting the Sunni kingdom yesterday, President Obama received the diplomatic equivalent of a one-fingered salute. Breaking with Arab custom, King Salman failed to greet the American president at Riyadh airport. It was a deliberate and significant insult. And while pathetic, the slight epitomizes the crisis in U.S.–Saudi relations.

It’s a crisis with two key sources: President Obama’s policies toward Iran and Syria. In Syria, Putin, Assad, Iran, and ISIS have turned that country into a dystopian factory for Sunni despair. Repeatedly outmaneuvering President Obama, President Putin has smashed U.S. credibility. The diplomatic routine is reliably circular: President Obama pushes for cease-fire, Putin accepts, Putin then breaks the cease-fire and demands further U.S. concessions. President Obama then yields and breaks commitments he’s made to the Sunni monarchies.

Things are similar vis-à-vis the Iran nuclear deal. Iran has won hundreds of billions of dollars in sanctions relief and continues to develop ballistic missiles. President Obama may get his history-book entry, but how will it read? When the ballistic breakthrough comes, Iran will reconstitute its enrichment activities. Forget “sanctions snapback”: The EU won’t sacrifice lucrative Iranian business deals. Put simply, President Obama’s strategy toward Iran reflects an utter repudiation of realism. That infuriates the Saudis.

RELATED: Obama’s Saudi Problem Stems from His Tilt Towards Iran

Of course, this is not to say that the House of Saud is a good ally to America or to our values. Indeed, whether it’s continued Saudi funding of a repellant Sunni supremacist ideology, the kingdom’s previous funding of al-Qaeda, its empowerment of grotesque woman-beaters who hide under veils of false moral virtue, or its systematic persecution of the nation’s Shia minority, the opposite is true. Nevertheless, America’s failure to constructively engage with Saudi Arabia would be a disaster. That’s because, absent U.S. influence, Saudi Arabia will inevitably slide into destructive sectarian paranoia — exactly what is occurring at this moment. As I’ve depressingly noted, rather than constraining extremism, President Obama’s Middle East strategy encourages the kingdom to resume its pre-2003 strategy of using jihadists as proxies. We must alter course.

#share#An America that cultivated the respect of Saudi Arabia rather than its disdain could, for example, encourage it to provide greater financial support to moderate Sunni political movements (instead of extremists) in Beirut, counterbalancing Hezbollah, and to undertake domestic reform efforts in the kingdom. The potential here is real: Saudi Arabia’s crown prince, Muhammed bin Nayef, and its foreign minister, Adel al-Jubeir, are proven allies to America, sworn enemies of al-Qaeda, and leaders with the capacity to move Saudi Arabia toward reforms and a stable future. But if we do not engage with these moderates, their voices will be drowned out by the geriatric fundamentalists.

RELATED: Saudi Arabia Needs to Change Course

Many hardline Wahhabists still lurk in Riyadh suburbs such as Diriyah, and they know that a political battle for the future of Saudi Arabia is inevitable. With oil prices declining steadily, the kingdom’s ability to buy the patronage of its people can’t last forever. Correspondingly, the kingdom will either reform and offer new opportunities to its people or it will collapse into religious fanaticism. Saudi Arabia is mostly desert, its economy is utterly dependent on government spending, and its society is insular and repressed — and 70 percent of its population is under 30. In short, unreformed, Saudi Arabia would give birth to a hundred Islamic States, armed with nuclear weapons.

From Baghdad to Beirut to Sana’a, Iran is now waging overt war on Saudi Arabia’s doorstep.

But for America to re-establish that respect, and to strengthen Saudi moderates, we will need to be bolder in checking Iran. From Baghdad to Beirut to Sana’a, Iran is now waging overt war on Saudi Arabia’s doorstep. Determined to establish gimp-proxy regimes across the region, the Iranian hardliners are intimidating moderate Sunni and Shia political movements into submission. Iran’s export of Shia insurgencies is viewed by King Salman as a battlefield encirclement and an existential threat. Just as ISIS’s rise was enabled by Sunni political disenfranchisement in Baghdad, Saudi extremism would be the natural consequence of an unchecked Iran.

America must engage with Saudi Arabia and help it tamp down the smoldering fires that threaten the regime. If we do nothing, it won’t be the Arabian Peninsula alone that burns. That fire will spread, as ISIS has, to our streets.

Tom Rogan is a columnist for National Review Online, a contributor to the Washington Examiner, and a former panelist on The McLaughlin Group. Email him at TRogan@McLaughlin.com

Most Popular

Film & TV

Knives Out Takes On the Anti-Immigration Crowd

Since the beginning of the Obama era, the Left has broadcast two contradictory messages on the subjects of race and immigration. The first is that a so-called Coalition of the Ascendant will inevitably displace white Americans as the dominant force in the country’s politics and culture. The second is that ... Read More
Film & TV

Knives Out Takes On the Anti-Immigration Crowd

Since the beginning of the Obama era, the Left has broadcast two contradictory messages on the subjects of race and immigration. The first is that a so-called Coalition of the Ascendant will inevitably displace white Americans as the dominant force in the country’s politics and culture. The second is that ... Read More
From left: Harvard University's Noah Feldman, Stanford University's Pamela Karlan, University of North Carolina's Michael Gerhardt, and George Washington University's Jonathan Turley testify before the House Judiciary Committee hearing on the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump, December 4, 2019.

The Impeachment Eye Test

To put it mildly, the 1960s were not notorious for juridical modesty. They might compare favorably, though, to Wednesday’s episode of “The Lawyer Left Does Impeachment” at the House Judiciary Committee. Oh, I have no doubt that the three progressive constitutional scholars spotlighted by Democrats yearn in ... Read More
From left: Harvard University's Noah Feldman, Stanford University's Pamela Karlan, University of North Carolina's Michael Gerhardt, and George Washington University's Jonathan Turley testify before the House Judiciary Committee hearing on the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump, December 4, 2019.

The Impeachment Eye Test

To put it mildly, the 1960s were not notorious for juridical modesty. They might compare favorably, though, to Wednesday’s episode of “The Lawyer Left Does Impeachment” at the House Judiciary Committee. Oh, I have no doubt that the three progressive constitutional scholars spotlighted by Democrats yearn in ... Read More
Culture

The Absurd Crusade against the Salvation Army

We all know some individuals who are so obviously good and kind that we are certain if anyone were to dislike them, that's all we would need to know about the person. We would immediately assume he or she is a bad person. To hate the manifestly good is a sure sign of being bad. Such is the case regarding the ... Read More
Culture

The Absurd Crusade against the Salvation Army

We all know some individuals who are so obviously good and kind that we are certain if anyone were to dislike them, that's all we would need to know about the person. We would immediately assume he or she is a bad person. To hate the manifestly good is a sure sign of being bad. Such is the case regarding the ... Read More
Elections

It’s Not Because She’s a Woman

In early October, Elizabeth Warren hit her stride. Her stock in the Democratic primary had been climbing steadily since midsummer, and as Joe Biden continued to lag, the Massachusetts senator became the first presidential hopeful to overtake him as front-runner in the RealClearPolitics polling average. She’s ... Read More
Elections

It’s Not Because She’s a Woman

In early October, Elizabeth Warren hit her stride. Her stock in the Democratic primary had been climbing steadily since midsummer, and as Joe Biden continued to lag, the Massachusetts senator became the first presidential hopeful to overtake him as front-runner in the RealClearPolitics polling average. She’s ... Read More
Film & TV

Clint Eastwood’s Messy, Nuanced Triumph

After a pipe bomb exploded at a concert held to celebrate the 1996 Olympics in Atlanta’s Centennial Park, the FBI came to suspect that the security guard who discovered the device might have planted it to gain a reputation as a hero. The knotty story of that security guard, Richard Jewell, does not lend itself ... Read More
Film & TV

Clint Eastwood’s Messy, Nuanced Triumph

After a pipe bomb exploded at a concert held to celebrate the 1996 Olympics in Atlanta’s Centennial Park, the FBI came to suspect that the security guard who discovered the device might have planted it to gain a reputation as a hero. The knotty story of that security guard, Richard Jewell, does not lend itself ... Read More
White House

Nancy Pelosi’s Case

Further to the post below, a couple of thoughts on Nancy Pelosi’s statement yesterday. She said this near the beginning: During the constitutional convention, James Madison, the architect of the Constitution, warned that a president might betray his trust to foreign powers which might prove fatal to the ... Read More
White House

Nancy Pelosi’s Case

Further to the post below, a couple of thoughts on Nancy Pelosi’s statement yesterday. She said this near the beginning: During the constitutional convention, James Madison, the architect of the Constitution, warned that a president might betray his trust to foreign powers which might prove fatal to the ... Read More