University Cop: Drawings of Penises Incite ‘Hate’ Like a ‘Swastika or the N-Word,’ Should Be Censored

(Image: via YouTube)
“Drawing a penis, or a swastika, or the n-word on there—what is that?”

A uniformed police officer told members of the University of Delaware’s chapter of Young Americans for Liberty not to allow classmates to draw phallic symbols on its “free-speech ball” because drawings of penises are “meant to provoke” “hate” much like “a swastika’ or “the n-word.”

“Drawing a penis, or a swastika, or the n-word on there — what is that?” the officer asks in a video of the confrontation, posted by YAl. “All it does is open up . . . you know, hate . . . I think it’s just meant to provoke.”

The entire point of the “free speech ball,” of course, was to open discussions about free speech and its limits. When a student in the video pointed this out, the officer insisted that he was only interfering for their own benefit:

“There’s some groups on campus where if they see something that they don’t like, they’re going to, you know, be upset and there’s not really going to be a discussion,” he said. “It’s just gonna be they’re hurt, they’re offended, and they want something done about it.”

#share#Well, the officer certainly has a point with his second clause. “Offended” students these days do seem to always “want something done about” whatever it is that’s offended them — whether that speech is protected or not.

Thankfully, however, the officer did clarify that the students were not formally in trouble for being seen with a beach ball with a penis drawn on it — but the fact that he’d found this worthy of his intervention in the first place really does speak volumes about the state of speech on campuses.

#related#Now, you may not like penises, but I think we can at least all agree that they’re not as bad as swastikas. What’s more, making such a ridiculous comparison is not only stupid, but also harmful. After all, if everything is “offensive,” then nothing is. Complaints about actually offensive things — like, you know, that “n-word” the cop talked about — will certainly lose their gravity if we start placing them on the same level of evil as a picture of an organ.

— Katherine Timpf is a reporter for National Review Online

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

The Second(-Class) Amendment

Editor’s Note: The following is the fourth in a series of articles in which Mr. Yoo and Mr. Phillips will lay out a course of constitutional restoration, pointing out areas where the Supreme Court has driven the Constitution off its rails and the ways the current Court can put it back on track. The first entry ... Read More

The Brexit Crisis

After what seem like years of a phony war, British and European Union negotiators finally agreed on the terms of Britain’s departure from the EU earlier this week, and Theresa May announced it in the House of Commons. The deal covers more than 500 pages of legal and bureaucratic prose, and few but the ... Read More

Friends of Elmer

Do you know what scares an American outdoorsman more than a grizzly bear? Twitter. In the late summer and early autumn, the hunting world had its eyes on the courts: The Trump administration had issued new guidance that would permit the hunting of brown bears (popularly known as grizzly bears), including in ... Read More