Politics & Policy

How Britain’s Left Is Conspiring to Prevent Brexit

Scotland’s First Minister Nicola Sturgeon (Russell Cheyne/Reuters)
A contempt for the democratic process is on full display.

According to Downing Street, a second Brexit referendum is “not remotely on the cards.” Listening to the British Left, however, you’d think a repeat vote was already a done deal. After all, even though a clear majority of Britons voted to leave the EU last Thursday, liberal elites have rejected said majority’s verdict. Instead, they have focused on three potential scenarios that would prevent Brexit.

First off, consider the Scottish National Party (SNP) led by Nicola Sturgeon. Dedicated to socialism first and nationalism second, the SNP is threatening to veto Brexit. Constitutionally the SNP cannot do this, but it wants to use Brexit as a weapon to extract financial concessions from Westminster. As I noted during Scotland’s 2014 referendum on whether to remain in the U.K., Scotland’s economy is inherently weak, plagued by decades of left-wing economic mismanagement. And today, because of the collapse in oil prices, were Parliament to cut off wealth transfers to Scotland, it would become a colder, albeit not-quite-as-horrific version of Venezuela. The SNP leadership knows this. And for that reason they will likely accept a deal that grants some form of EU rights in terms of movement of persons and access to markets, alongside new money from Parliament. Still, by using the referendum’s outcome as a blackmail weapon, the SNP is making Brexit more complicated and unnecessarily expensive by likely requiring further subsidy payments from Westminster to the Scottish Parliament at Holyrood.

RELATED: Liberal Cosmopolitans Lash Out at the Shattering of Their Worldview

Next up is last Friday’s now-viral comment by the user “Teebs” on the Guardian’s opinion website. Teebs claims that pro-Brexit MP Boris Johnson (the likely replacement for David Cameron) will have to abandon Brexit: “If he runs for leadership of the party, and then fails to follow through on triggering article 50 [starting the two-year countdown for UK withdrawal], then he is finished. . . . If he runs, wins, and pulls the UK out of the EU, then it will all be over — Scotland will break away, there will upheaval in Ireland, a recession . . . broken trade agreements. Then he is also finished.” Teebs continues, “Brexit is unachievable in reality without an enormous amount of pain and destruction that cannot be borne.” This comment has sent the British intellectual Left into emotional rapture. It must, so the desperate consensus goes, be right! But Teebs here expresses a confidence unbound from reality. Whether Britain’s next prime minister is Johnson or someone else, and whether or not a recession looms, the next occupant of No. 10 Downing Street will not be able to escape implementing Brexit, because it represents the vested will of the British people. Constitutional convention and democratic responsibility require its fulfillment. This was the existential purpose of the referendum: to settle the question.

But while Teebs’s analysis is misguided, it is not without support. On the contrary, pro-EU Britons are desperately calling for a second ballot, or a rejection of the first referendum, or something — anything — to stop Brexit. Joining a flood of yuppie social-media posters attacking pro-Brexit voters as psychopathic idiots, the Brexit rejectionists are, put simply, sore losers. Instead of accepting the referendum’s outcome, they hope their wailing and screeching and media preaching will shame conservatives and their fellow pro-Brexit liberals into surrender. It’s not going to happen, but it does muddy the waters.

#related#Finally, there’s the effort by certain members of Parliament to claim that Brexit cannot proceed absent explicit Parliamentary approval. Although this is true on paper, were Parliament to reject the will of the people as rendered in the referendum, it would be a democratic crisis. The British people would become subjects to those who have sworn to serve them. Superseding the referendum would represent the immolation of the Magna Carta and bring a sad end to British democracy.

Absurd as the aforementioned anti-democratic forces might be, they are not unique to Britain. Consider today’s Brexit assessment from the Washington Post: “Brexit is a reminder that some things just shouldn’t be decided by referendum.” Decrying Brexit’s trust in individual freedom, the Post draws parallels to America by lamenting California’s 1978 property-tax-increase ballot restriction. It would be funny were it not sad. Regardless, the timeline and shape of Brexit is not yet clear. But two things are clear: It will happen, and the Left is openly disdainful of the democratic process that led to it. A new paraphrase of the classic Orwellian motto springs to mind: “All questions are equal, but some answers are more equal than others.”

Tom Rogan is a columnist for National Review Online, a contributor to the Washington Examiner, and a former panelist on The McLaughlin Group. Email him at TRogan@McLaughlin.com

Most Popular


In Defense of Coleman Hughes

Picture the scene: A young man walks into a congressional hearing to offer witness testimony. His grandfather was barbarically brutalized by people who are now long dead. The nation in which he resides built its wealth of his grandfather’s brutalization. The question: Should his fellow citizens pay the young ... Read More
Film & TV

Toy Story 4: A National Anthem

The Toy Story franchise is the closest thing we have to an undisputed national anthem, a popular belief that celebrates what we think we all stand for — cooperation, ingenuity, and simple values, such as perpetual hope. This fact of our infantile, desensitized culture became apparent back in 2010 when I took a ... Read More
Film & TV

Fosse/Verdon and the Dismal #MeToo Obsession

In the final episode of Fosse/Verdon, one of the two titular characters, Bob Fosse, is shooting one of the greatest films of all time. The other, Gwen Verdon, is having a quarrel with her unspeakably dull boyfriend about whether he approves of her performing in a road-show production of a Broadway musical. These ... Read More

Joe and the Segs

Joe Biden has stepped in it, good and deep. Biden, if he has any hope of ever being elected president, will be dependent on residual goodwill among African Americans from his time as Barack Obama’s loyal and deferential vice president — so deferential, in fact, that he stood aside for Herself in 2016 even ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Madcap Caution of Donald Trump

The worry last week was that the Trump administration was ginning up fake intelligence about Iran blowing up oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz to justify a war against Iran. Then, this week, President Donald Trump said the Iranian attacks weren’t a big deal. The episode is another indication of the ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Elizabeth Warren’s Terrible Plans

Elizabeth Warren is being lauded as the serious candidate in the race. Her motto, “I have a plan for that,” is accepted as proof that she is thoughtful and conscientious. That’s too generous. One should expect a grown-up to evaluate costs and benefits, to understand tradeoffs, and to pay for what they ... Read More

College Leaders Should Learn from Oberlin

Thanks to their social-justice warrior mindset, the leaders of Oberlin College have caused an Ohio jury to hit it with $44 million in compensatory and punitive damages in a case where the school couldn't resist the urge to side with its “woke” students against a local business. College leaders should learn ... Read More