Let’s Not Overthink the Motives of the Orlando Shooter

Omar Mateen in an undated photo (Reuters)
Omar Mateen said he did it for ISIS — that explanation should count for something.

Omar Mateen fatally shot 49 people and wounded 50 others at the Pulse gay nightclub in Orlando, Fla., on June 12, and as late as June 15 the New York Times editorial board was still puzzling over his possible motive:

While the precise motivation for the rampage remains unclear, it is evident that Mr. Mateen was driven by hatred toward gays and lesbians. Hate crimes don’t happen in a vacuum. They occur where bigotry is allowed to fester, where minorities are vilified and where people are scapegoated for political gain.

Granted, Mateen was a troubled, complex individual who might have been gay himself and who expressed support for Hezbollah and al-Qaeda, which have fought against ISIS and each other. But the evidence that Mateen committed mass slaughter partly out of allegiance to ISIS is explicit and strong. Attempts to psychologize an additional motive, such as repressed homosexuality, are in this case secondary to the immediate national-security threat posed by the pattern of terrorism committed in the U.S. and inspired by Middle Eastern Islamist terror groups.

During his spree, Mateen called 9-1-1 to pledge his allegiance to ISIS. He made several other 9-1-1 calls, in which he mentioned the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing, which was carried out by Islamic radicals, and Moner Mohammad Abu-Salha, the Fort Pierce, Fla., man who in 2014 became the first American to carry out a suicide attack in Syria. Mateen then called News 13, a local Orlando television station, telling the producer that he was the shooter and that he attacked the nightclub for the Islamic State.

In an odd turn, he paused shooting and asked whether any black people occupied the club. Following several phone calls, he started speaking in Arabic and then reportedly said, “I don’t have a problem with black people. This is about my country. You guys suffered enough.” Partiality toward black people doesn’t necessarily fit the image of an Islamist terrorist, but his emphasis on avenging his “country” — apparently Afghanistan, where his parents were born — against the perceived evils of the West does.

Furthermore, after the rampage, Mateen posted on his Facebook page: “I pledge my alliance to [ISIS leader] abu bakr al Baghdadi..may Allah accept me. The real muslims will never accept the filthy ways of the west. . . . You kill innocent women and children by doing us taste the Islamic state vengeance.” Before the shooting, he had posted, “America and Russia stop bombing the Islamic state” and “In the next few days you will see attacks from the Islamic state in the usa.” 

#share#His apparent radicalization began long before the shooting. The FBI investigation into the massacre revealed that Mateen had watched Islamic State terrorist videos, including some showing beheadings, and had described them to co-workers. He had also told his co-workers of his desire to become a martyr, reportedly telling them that if the FBI “raided his house and killed his wife and child,” that would free him to martyr himself in an operation.

By his own admission, Mateen’s allegiance to ISIS was the proximate cause of his massacre.

These and other similar comments so consternated his co-workers in 2013 that they alerted the local sheriff’s office, which then informed the FBI. The bureau’s “preliminary investigation” into Mateen lasted ten months — six months longer than average. A second FBI probe examined his unclear tie to Moner Mohammad Abu-Salha. Neither investigation confirmed wrongdoing. Some of his former classmates said he cheered the terrorist on 9/11 and recalled that he had been expelled from his high school in Stuart, Fla., shortly thereafter.

The bulk of available evidence supports the reasonable speculation that, despite his possibly motley motivations, Mateen was inspired by ISIS and perhaps other Islamist terrorist organizations. Nonetheless, some, such as Paul McGeough, writing for the Sydney Morning Herald (June 16). harbor serious doubt: “Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump’s hectoring about global terrorism and Muslim migration will seem misguided if there’s nothing to link Mateen to foreign movements and he is confirmed to be a case of what US President Barack Obama has called ‘the kind of home-grown extremism that all of us have been concerned about.’”

#related#This raises the question “Are Mateen’s repeated and explicit identifications with the Islamic State insufficient to link him to the movement?” The New York Times et al. continue their psychological and sociological analyses of Mateen’s possible subconscious motives. They reference the supposed contagion of undefined “hate” incubated in an atmosphere where Republicans can freely oppose political agendas with which they disagree. They suggest that suppressing one’s sexual orientation could cause one to become a murderer. The FBI investigation is ongoing, but the journalists whose job it is to offer educated speculation are prioritizing vague conjectures over evidence of a much tighter cause-and-effect relationship.

By his own admission, Mateen’s allegiance to ISIS was the proximate cause of his massacre. Unlike complex and indeterminable self-loathing, ISIS is an organization with a known ideology and can be destroyed, and the final destination of the terrorist attacks it inspires is the West, where they can be crushed.

Most Popular

PC Culture

Hate-Crime Hoaxes Reflect America’s Sickness

On January 29, tabloid news site TMZ broke the shocking story that Jussie Smollett, a gay black entertainer and progressive activist, had been viciously attacked in Chicago. Two racist white men had fractured his rib, poured bleach on him, and tied a noose around his neck. As they were leaving, they shouted ... Read More

Ilhan Omar’s Big Lie

In a viral exchange at a congressional hearing last week, the new congresswoman from Minnesota, Ilhan Omar, who is quickly establishing herself as the most reprehensible member of the House Democratic freshman class despite stiff competition, launched into Elliott Abrams. She accused the former Reagan official ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Strange Paradoxes of Our Age

Modern prophets often say one thing and do another. Worse, they often advocate in the abstract as a way of justifying their doing the opposite in the concrete. The result is that contemporary culture abounds with the inexplicable — mostly because modern progressivism makes all sorts of race, class, and ... Read More
PC Culture

Fake Newspeople

This week, the story of the Jussie Smollett hoax gripped the national media. The story, for those who missed it, went something like this: The Empire actor, who is both black and gay, stated that on a freezing January night in Chicago, in the middle of the polar vortex, he went to a local Subway store to buy a ... Read More

White Progressives Are Polarizing America

To understand how far left (and how quickly) the Democratic party has moved, let’s cycle back a very short 20 years. If 1998 Bill Clinton ran in the Democratic primary today, he’d be instantaneously labeled a far-right bigot. His support for the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the Defense of Marriage Act, ... Read More

One Last Grift for Bernie Sanders

Bernie Sanders, the antique Brooklyn socialist who represents Vermont in the Senate, is not quite ready to retire to his lakeside dacha and so once again is running for the presidential nomination of a party to which he does not belong with an agenda about which he cannot be quite entirely ... Read More
PC Culture

Merciless Sympathy

Jussie Smollett’s phony hate-crime story could have been taken apart in 24 hours, except for one thing: Nobody wanted to be the first to call bullsh**. Who will bell the cat? Not the police, and I don’t blame them. Smollett is a vocal critic of President Donald Trump who checks two protected-category ... Read More

Questions for Those Who Believed Jussie Smollett

The “we reported the Jussie Smollett case responsibly” contention has been blasted to smithereens. Twitter accounts and headlines in the Washington Post, the New York Times, and the Los Angeles Times reported as fact Jussie Smollett’s wildly implausible allegations, and many other journalists did so as ... Read More