Politics & Policy

California’s Culture War against Religious Liberty

A new law would withhold funds from schools that didn’t toe the leftist line on ‘gender identity.’

California occupies a place of significance in America, considering the size of its population and economy. Its association with Hollywood and celebrity also gives it, regrettably, the role of cultural trendsetter. So when first-of-its-kind anti-religious-liberty legislation finds warm embrace in California’s state senate, it’s a foreboding signal of things to come.

Tacked onto existing law, the proposed amendment to the state’s Equity in Higher Education Act attempts to stigmatize and coercively punish any religious belief system that might dare to offer a difference of opinion about sexuality and gender. The bill strong-arms religious schools into an untenable position: Either compromise their religious identity or risk losing access to grants and government-backed financial assistance like Cal Grants. How so? According to the legislation, any religious school that made admission decisions or laid out student-conduct expectations based on religious criteria that were at odds with the bill’s protected classes would risk losing access to state funds unless they affirmed the highly contestable categories of “sexual orientation” and “gender identity” – categories at odds with views about marriage and sexuality in many religious traditions.

RELATED: LGBT Activists and the Education Department Are Colluding against Christian Colleges

Let’s be very clear: This amendment attempts to fix a non-existent problem. Students who apply and attend colleges do so voluntarily. There are no victims here — unless victimhood is measured in terms of institutions singled out for their countercultural religious convictions.

As I wrote at National Review Online in May, the next wave of the sexual-revolutionary agenda is to bring all dissenting institutions into conformity with progressive orthodoxy. This bill is designed to do exactly that. It undermines Christian higher education by limiting access to financial grants and discouraging students from applying and attending — thus slowly crippling religious institutions’ viability. So, as opposed to genuine difference and pluralism, progressives are proving once again that their commitment to diversity is all for show.

California Policy Council, the state’s social-conservative activist group, has come out against the bill, setting forth this argument:

The intent of this bill is transparent: to target Christian schools that maintain Biblical beliefs on marriage and sexuality, and to use the threat of losing government funds to force them to change those beliefs. It puts schools into a terrible predicament. If they maintain their beliefs, their prospective students will not be eligible for Cal Grants, and the schools will suffer significant financial loss. If they give in to this requirement, they compromise their core principles.

The same group rightly points out that a bill such as this “means a Baptist school can be sued for refusing to allow a male student who ‘identifies’ as a woman to live in a women’s dormitory, or to use women’s restrooms and showers.” Absurdities such as this attack the notion of freedom to live according to its convictions. This isn’t just bad for Christian schools; it’s bad for very notion of the freedom to associate writ large.

RELATED: Religious Liberty: The Necessary Fight

Most egregiously, the bill takes existing exemptions that have worked for decades and narrows what type of institution can now receive them. Religious institutions have long received exemptions from some non-discrimination statutes for reasons of religious criteria, but this bill applies only to “educational programs or activities offered by an educational institution that is controlled by a religious organization to prepare students to become ministers of the religion, to enter upon some other vocation of the religion, or to teach theological subjects pertaining to the religion, if the application of this chapter would not be consistent with the religious tenets of that organization.” In short, institutions such as seminaries are protected. But other Christian higher-educational institutions — Biola University, William Jessup University, or Westmont College, for instance — might lose applicants, because these schools would be found in violation of the law and could be forced to stop participating in the Cal Grant program.

Additionally, any school that receives an exemption would be required to publicly post their alleged bigotry. This follows a disturbing trend of groups such as the Human Rights Campaign that have lobbied the Department of Education to create a database of religious schools that receive Title IX exemptions.

#related#The brazen actions of both the Human Rights Campaign and the California senate demonstrate, once again, that liberals are the true aggressors in the culture war. It also reveals the zero-sum approach that sexual revolutionaries are taking in their victory lap after these battles. Not content to allow religious schools to simply exist, the culture warriors will attempt in the next wave to shut down the dissenters.

With this new amendment to the Equity in Higher Education Act, religious liberty is now suffering a slow burn in California. It’s difficult to put into words how shockingly destructive and invasive this legislation is. Then again, the shock at this law’s intent is only exceeded by the strength of California’s commitment to a solipsistic progressivism.

Most Popular

Film & TV

Why We Can’t Have Wakanda

SPOILERS AHEAD Black Panther is a really good movie that lives up to the hype in just about every way. Surely someone at Marvel Studios had an early doubt, reading the script and thinking: “Wait, we’re going to have hundreds of African warriors in brightly colored tribal garb, using ancient weapons, ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More