Culture

Period-Tracking App Concerned the Terms ‘Female-Bodied’ and ‘Uterus-Havers’ Are Too Offensive

Be sure you're not being too "gendered" when talking about periods.

The folks at the period-tracking app Clue wrote a 1,027-word piece freaking out about what kind of language people could possibly use to talk about periods and women’s bodies without being so “gendered” that it’s exclusive.

“How do we accurately describe the domain that Clue serves (“female health”) without using gendered language?” asks the piece, co-written by By Lisa Kennelly, Director of Marketing at Clue, and Mike LaVigne, Chief Product Officer at Clue.

“What about all the other places we communicate?” it continues, explaining that they also “have a website, a blog, a newsletter and various social media channels.”

“Using the word ‘female’ or ‘female-bodied’ is offensive to some,” the piece states. “It’s seen as dehumanizing or still too gendered.”

The rest of the piece continues to weigh different options for the kind of terminology it could use to discuss periods and women’s health (whoops, sorry, they said that’s one of the bad ones because “not everyone who has a cycle is a woman”) — without excluding anyone, but can’t seem to find anything that isn’t problematic.

For example: Calling people “uterus-havers” or “people who menstruate” is “inaccurate, because Clue’s users don’t always have a uterus (hysterectomy) or menstruate (menarche, pregnancy, menopause, birth control).” “Reproductive health”? Well, that “could work sometimes, but tends to connote too much about fertility and babies which is not relevant for many people, and also could apply to people with either male or female biologies.” “Cycle health”? Well, although that “gets closer,” “it’s also not relevant if you don’t currently have a cycle for whatever reason.”

Ultimately, they conclude that although “‘[w]omen’s health’ may be more humanizing than ‘female health,’ as ‘female health’ can also feel too clinical or abstracted,” “female health” is probably “the best option” to describe “the area that Clue serves.”

“We feel it best captures the area of health that Clue is currently designed to support, while being the least exclusive of all the ways to describe that biology,” they decide. “We also feel it is the best option in terms of communication and accessibility  —  in other words, we hope our community will understand the rationale behind this choice when this term is used in our communications.”

(“Hope our comminity will understand”? You hope people will understand why you’re using “female health” to describe “female health?” Um, yeah, no problem, I definitely understand, what I don’t understand is whatever the hell else I just read.)

Look. Linking having a period with being “female” shouldn’t be this complicated. Sure, there are people who don’t identify as women who have periods, and women who don’t have periods, but to think that if you don’t write an agonizing diatribe like this that people might think your app is transphobic or whatever is actually absurd.

#related#But apparently they disagree. Because even though they they do concede to referring to the “area of health” that they “support” as “female health,” they then end the piece by explaining that they understand that it’s not really good enough and that the “term is, of course, open to change.”

“We’d like to have partners to help us figure this out and come together to find an accurate way for us to use helpful, accessible terminology across a global set of languages and cultures,” they state.

Thank God. After all, if they hadn’t included that, I would be absolutely certain that this company was actually some kind of transphobic monster-force that’s destroying the world.

Most Popular

Elections

Trouble in the Workers’ Paradise

Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is precisely the sort of campaign surrogate you want, especially if you are Bernie Sanders: She is young, energetic, charismatic, popular (with the people she needs to be popular with, anyway), and, happily, currently ineligible to run for the presidency ... Read More
Elections

Trouble in the Workers’ Paradise

Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is precisely the sort of campaign surrogate you want, especially if you are Bernie Sanders: She is young, energetic, charismatic, popular (with the people she needs to be popular with, anyway), and, happily, currently ineligible to run for the presidency ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Bill Barr Derangement Syndrome

Can the republic survive Attorney General William Barr? That’s the question that has seized the media and center-left, which have worked themselves into a full-blown panic over an attorney general who is, inarguably, a serious legal figure and one of the adults in the room late in President Trump’s first ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Bill Barr Derangement Syndrome

Can the republic survive Attorney General William Barr? That’s the question that has seized the media and center-left, which have worked themselves into a full-blown panic over an attorney general who is, inarguably, a serious legal figure and one of the adults in the room late in President Trump’s first ... Read More
Elections

RIP Bloomberg 2020

I thought that Bloomberg’s confused half-defense of stop-and-frisk was going to be his low point. Well. His torturous response on his lawsuits and NDAs was truly awful -- beyond incompetent. I wouldn’t be surprised if this were the end of Bloomberg 2020. Read More
Elections

RIP Bloomberg 2020

I thought that Bloomberg’s confused half-defense of stop-and-frisk was going to be his low point. Well. His torturous response on his lawsuits and NDAs was truly awful -- beyond incompetent. I wouldn’t be surprised if this were the end of Bloomberg 2020. Read More
Law & the Courts

The Roger Stone Double Standard

Whether Roger Stone, the loopy, self-aggrandizing political operative, deserves nine years in Supermax for obstructing an investigation into Russia–Donald Trump “collusion” is debatable. Whether the powerful men who helped create the investigation that ensnared Stone have been allowed to lie with impunity ... Read More
Law & the Courts

The Roger Stone Double Standard

Whether Roger Stone, the loopy, self-aggrandizing political operative, deserves nine years in Supermax for obstructing an investigation into Russia–Donald Trump “collusion” is debatable. Whether the powerful men who helped create the investigation that ensnared Stone have been allowed to lie with impunity ... Read More