Culture

College Bias Team Deems Whiteboards Saying ‘Make America Great Again’ to Be ‘Racialized Attacks’

(Inset images via Skidmore College report)

The Bias Response Group (BRG) at Skidmore College determined that writing “Make America Great Again” on dry-erase boards amounted to performing “racialized, targeted attacks,” according to the group’s year-end report.

The team’s issue, according to the College Fix, was that the phrases were written on the whiteboards of “two female faculty of color.”

Now, I suppose I can see how that fact might make the issue more complicated, but regardless, calling these incidents “attacks” is objectively incorrect just based on what the word “attack” means. Hitting someone in the face is an attack. Cursing someone out is an attack. “Make America Great Again” is a campaign slogan, and students should be free to show support for whichever candidate they choose on campus, even if that candidate is Donald Trump.

The report seems to suggest, however, that showing support for Trump is actually in itself some kind of hateful act when it explains that the slogan is unacceptable because it “is associated with the political campaign of a candidate widely known to voice anti-immigrant and bigoted views.”

The report maintains that although that “political speech is free and protected,” a “majority of BRG members do not interpret these messages as political speech but as politicized, racialized, targeted attacks intended to intimidate,” because they “suggest a pattern of using the idea of political speech to target specific members of the Skidmore community.”

Here’s the thing with that, though. It doesn’t really matter how the BRG interprets the messages, because a campaign slogan is as about as clear an example of “political speech” as one can get. Claiming to protect “political speech,” yet deeming an innocuous campaign slogan (well, at least innocuous to anyone who wants America to be great) to be in itself some kind of hate crime is a logical fallacy.

#related#If there was somehow more to the story, if these teachers had to go through something other than seeing a campaign slogan that’s been seen pretty much everywhere for more than a year, then I could see how there might be a case here. If the whiteboards contained racial epithets — or even anything personal at all — then I could see how there might be a case here. But they didn’t. They contained a campaign slogan, and only a campaign slogan, and one that makes absolutely no reference to race whatsoever, and the Bias Response team is calling it an attack? Not even just a “microaggression,” (which I could maybe see the argument for,) but a “racialized, targeted” attack? Sorry, but no. Let’s relax, and try to limit the use of this powerful word to describing only those situations where it actually applies. 

One note appeared on a whiteboard in March, and another in April.

Most Popular

Film & TV

A Sad Finale

Spoilers Ahead. Look, I share David’s love of Game of Thrones. But I thought the finale was largely a bust, for failings David mostly acknowledges in passing (but does not allow to dampen his ardor). The problems with the finale were largely the problems of this entire season. Characters that had been ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Great Misdirection

The House Democrats are frustrated, very frustrated. They’ve gotten themselves entangled in procedural disputes with the Trump administration that no one particularly cares about and that might be litigated for a very long time. A Washington Post report over the weekend spelled out how stymied Democrats ... Read More
World

Australia’s Voters Reject Leftist Ideas

Hell hath no fury greater than left-wingers who lose an election in a surprise upset. Think Brexit in 2016. Think Trump’s victory the same year. Now add Australia. Conservative prime minister Scott Morrison shocked pollsters and pundits alike with his victory on Saturday, and the reaction has been brutal ... Read More
NR Webathon

We’ve Had Bill Barr’s Back

One of the more dismaying features of the national political debate lately is how casually and cynically Attorney General Bill Barr has been smeared. He is routinely compared to Roy Cohn on a cable-TV program that prides itself on assembling the most thoughtful and plugged-in political analysts and ... Read More