Politics & Policy

What Trump Got Right

Trump greets supporters at a rally in Lakeland, Fla., October 12, 2016. (Reuters photo: Mike Segar)
Trump is an embarrassment, but he grasps the need to address the concerns of ordinary Americans.

Matt Continetti’s characteristically incisive “Crisis of the Conservative Intellectual” is well worth reading in full, and its final paragraph warrants especial consideration. He outlines some of the trends that have brought the GOP and the conservative movement to the present moment, especially highlighting the at times contentious relationship between conventional conservatism and populism. Continetti argues that conservatives have long allied with populists (offering Reagan as an emblematic figure) but fears that “on the presidential level most clearly . . . the alliance with populism is bringing diminishing returns.” Finding that some of the more adversarian impulses within the Right might eventually poison the broader coalition, Continetti suggests that the very trends that helped bring movement conservatism to power might now be tearing it apart.

The rise of Donald Trump is, of course, a key backdrop for this essay. It’s certainly true that there are real differences on the right. It’s also true that a substantial rethinking of conservative priorities (or at least the reimagining of the application of conservative principles to present-day challenges) seems a promising, if difficult, enterprise.

However, at least part of what has troubled the GOP at the present moment has been the aping of populist language without delivering on various populist policy priorities. “Taking the country back” from Washington “elites,” restoring power to “real America,” and invocations of “Establishment” betrayal have been thoroughly mainstreamed in the rhetoric of the Right. This rhetoric clearly plays to populist impulses and has led to increased distrust of the established institutions of power. I’m not saying that this rhetoric is necessarily inappropriate, just that it is common. Meanwhile, on domestic policy, populist-inclined Americans might feel that they have gotten little from Republicans in recent years.

This tension between language and policy is especially keen on immigration, one of the major populist (though not only populist) flashpoints. Republicans run on “secure the border” and pledge their opposition to “amnesty,” only for many of them, once in office, to champion “comprehensive” immigration reform that frontloads legalization, expands guest-worker programs, and makes easily vitiated commitments on enforcement. Populist fires are stoked by rhetoric only to be frustrated by policy. This frustration only exacerbates a sense of alienation and distrust.

All this brings us to Trump and the likely result on November 8. A lack of accommodation to populism — on immigration, trade, and elsewhere — provided a massive policy opening for Trump in mid 2015. Trump’s celebrity played a role in his gaining media attention, but a policy vacuum was necessary for his success. Rick Santorum and, by late 2015, Ted Cruz did more than their rivals to try to adapt populist themes, but, for different reasons, they could not displace Trump; Santorum struggled to get a critical mass of media coverage, and establishment hatred for Cruz ensured that he could never consolidate the non-Trump vote.

Moreover, much of what might be ailing Trump is more about him and less about populism. Poll after poll after poll suggests that doubts about Trump’s character — not his policy positions — are dragging him down. Alternative history is a particularly parlous form of punditry, but it can still sometimes reveal in its distortions. If Marco Rubio or John Kasich had won the nomination on a somewhat populist platform, it would seem likely that we would not right now be risking a pro-Clinton blowout (a point Peggy Noonan also contemplates).

Much of what might be ailing Trump is more about him and less about populism.

Before the meltdown after the first debate and the Access Hollywood tape, Trump had kept this race fairly close. A candidate who had run on some of his issues while showing more discipline on the campaign trail would surely be doing better and likely winning. All this suggests that some kind of populism is not necessarily poison in the general election. It also implies that responsibly adapting to some populist trends can be a way of ensuring that populist fires do not get out of control. If conservatives want to channel populist energies responsibly, they must ensure that responsible men and women address populism in a good-faith way.

One possible way of decreasing the temperature of the controversies described by Continetti would be to adapt to some policy impulses of populists while moderating the burn-it-all-down rhetoric. It’s worth noting in passing that some of the impulses of the recent populist fever are not at odds with the broader project of conservative reform; populism has been fueled by a breakdown of civil society and increased working-class economic anxiety, two areas of no small concern for reform conservatives. The current populist explosion — culminating in Trump’s victory in the presidential primaries — should be seen as a bright sign for the need for reform.

— Fred Bauer is a writer from New England. He blogs at A Certain Enthusiasm.

Fred Bauer — Fred Bauer is a writer from New England. His work has been featured in numerous publications, including The Weekly Standard and The Daily Caller. He also blogs at ...

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More