Politics & Policy

In Washington State, Unions Advance a Ballot Measure to Keep Members in the Dark

(Dreamstime image: Lane Erickson)
The aim is to stop a think tank from informing union members that they don’t have to belong.

On November 8, voters across the state of Washington will decide Ballot Initiative 1501, the Seniors and Vulnerable Individuals’ Safety and Financial Crimes Prevention Act. If passed, the measure’s proponents claim, I-1501 will increase criminal penalties for targeting seniors and vulnerable individuals in acts of identity theft and consumer fraud and will prohibit the release of any public records that may facilitate such crimes. But it would accomplish neither objective. The measure’s sole sponsor, the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), is brazenly attempting to deceive voters and misuse the statewide initiative process.

To look into the facts is to discover that I-1501’s intent has nothing to do with protecting citizens, and everything to do with altering the Public Records Act to prevent the Freedom Foundation, a conservative think tank, from obtaining the membership list of the SEIU – and, specifically, from obtaining the names of members who serve as home care providers and informing them of their constitutional right to opt out of paying union fees.

In 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that state-employed care providers have the option of leaving unions such as the SEIU, and since then, the Freedom Foundation has aggressively taken action. Its strategy is to file public records requests, obtain union membership lists, and contact every member, even if it has to go door to door, to inform those who have been left in the dark that they can stop paying into the union. “A lot of people didn’t even know they were in the union, or that they were having the dues being deducted from their Medicaid reimbursement checks,” Brian Minnich, the executive vice president of the Freedom Foundation, tells National Review.

The Freedom Foundation effortlessly obtained SEIU 925’s membership list through the Public Record Act and notified members of their rights. The union shrunk nearly 60 percent. In the courts, Washington’s other SEIU chapter, SEIU 775, challenged the Freedom Foundation’s use of public records, and the Freedom Foundation prevailed. The state supreme court refused to hear the union’s appeal. In the aftermath of its legal loss, SEIU has donated $1.6 million to fund I-1501 public advocacy in a final attempt to prevent the think tank from obtaining its membership list. The authors of I-1501 don’t explicitly state its true purpose, though. They have disguised the initiative with the spin that it protects seniors and vulnerable individuals from identity theft.

This notion that I-1501 would impede identity theft by prohibiting the release of public records is ludicrous. The state’s Public Records Act does not allow individuals to request sensitive information, and, as Minnich notes, the lists in question show only a member’s name and date of birth. “I-1501 is a Trojan horse,” as the Seattle Times editorial board perfectly describes the initiative and the SEIU’s attempt to deceive voters. Identity theft is a hot topic, and few people would oppose what seems to be an effort to close significant loopholes that identity thieves could exploit.

The SEIU has fully funded the campaign for I-1501, but it’s not just the powerful union that has deceived voters. The state’s attorney general has a responsibility to validate the title of each initiative, and clearly I-1501’s title does not represent that it would alter the Public Records Act. “The whole thing is just insidious,” Minnich says. “How in the world could you come up with a ballot title like that?”

If I-1501 passes, one effect will be that individuals will have less access to government records. Another noteworthy demand that the initiative stipulates is that within 180 days the department of social and health services will be required to “report to the governor and attorney general about any additional records that should be made exempt from public disclosure.” In other words, I-1501 would continue to erode the Public Records Act after it was implemented.

#related#Regardless of the outcome on November 8, the Freedom Foundation will continue to challenge SEIU and other unions by contacting their members. In just one month, SEIU 775 lost 1,600 dues-paying members because of the Freedom Foundation’s activism and message, which has clearly resonated.

Ballot Initiative 1501 is a sham that, if passed, will allow the SEIU to chip away at the Public Records Act for the sake of keeping members uninformed about their constitutional rights. On November 8, Washington State voters should read past I-1501’s reassuring title, which is a Trojan horse.

Austin YackAustin Yack is a William F. Buckley Fellow in Political Journalism at the National Review Institute and a University of California, Santa Barbara alumnus.


The Latest

Rat Patrol

Rat Patrol

Illegal leaks of classified information should be treated as a serious offense. But they would be easier to prevent if less information were classified.
Why Obama Failed

Why Obama Failed

In a revealing interview, Obama tried to burnish his image for progressive posterity — but he still doesn’t understand his fundamental errors.