How Trump Can Stop Erdoğan from Playing the United States

Erdogan with President Obama at the White House in 2013. (Reuters photo: Kevin Lamarque)
It’s about time the White House got tough with Turkey’s authoritarian leader.

Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan has big ambitions. He wants to become an Imam Ataturk, a leader who replaces Turkey’s national secularism with autocratic political Islam.

But this week, by claiming the United States supports ISIS, Erdogan crossed a line. In doing so, he showed that he’ll make any move he likes, even if it seriously harms obvious American interests. The stakes are significant, and come January 20th, President Trump will have to respond.

For a start, it’s clear that Erdogan is no longer a U.S. ally; these days, he is a humbled subject of Vladimir Putin. As I’ve explained, Erdogan’s supplication to Russia was forged by two developments: ISIS’s increasing threat to Turkey and President Obama’s yielding of Syria to Russian dominion. The days when Erdogan shot down Russian fighter jets are long gone. He knows who is boss now: the KGB colonel.

This is a problem for the United States in specific ways. For one, Erdogan’s shift in allegiance means he is likely to help Putin suffocate Syria’s Sunni rebellion against Assad. Erdogan once fastidiously supported that rebellion (though he sometimes also helped extremist groups fighting against Assad), but today his priorities have shifted. In return for Russian pressure on the Kurds and a long term (albeit unenforceable) Russian commitment to Assad’s transition out of power, Erdogan will take Putin’s orders.

And if Trump thinks this is a good thing, he’s in for a bad surprise. After all, if the moderate Sunni rebellion is crushed, its fighting elements (and the Sunni-Arab monarchies) won’t just return to civilian life. Instead, they will throw their support to Salafi jihadists such as ISIS and Jabhat Fateh al-Sham. Remember, the great lie of Russia’s campaign in Syria is the notion that it targets ISIS. In reality, Russia supports ISIS’s empowerment so as to destabilize Europe and pressure the west to accept Assad as the lesser of two evils. Erdogan, because he is so obsessively opposed to Kurdish empowerment, has become an easy mark for Putin’s manipulation.

Facing this challenge, Trump must do what Obama has not. Namely, something.

While Erdogan rails against U.S. foreign policy, the Turkish defense establishment is heavily reliant on American support.

He has good options. First off, he can rebuild America’s old balance-of-power-based alliances. Made paranoid by Iran’s empowerment under the Obama administration, the U.S.’s traditional Sunni-Arab allies are now doubling down on sectarianism. But if Trump challenges Iran’s nuclear-deal cheating, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Co. will quickly step into America’s corner. In turn, Trump can utilize that new influence to pressure Erdogan. If they sense serious U.S. leadership against Iran, the Sunni monarchies will be happy to deprioritize their diplomatic and economic ties with Turkey. Trump’s budding friendship with Egyptian president Abdel Fattah el-Sisi offers a template here. Erdogan and el-Sisi already hate each other. Erdogan’s unyielding desire for international prestige is Trump’s means of pressuring him. Sensing isolation, he will alter course.

The Kurdish question offers another opportunity to Trump. Erdogan is deeply concerned by the rise of Kurdish territorial interests in northern Syria and Iraq. But while he’s relying on the Russians to check these ambitions, he must know that only the United States has the multi-spectrum Kurdish relationships to address his concerns. All three parties have long benefited from America’s role as an interlocutor between Turkey and Kurdish political groups. So Trump should warn Erdogan that if he continues degrading U.S. interests, the U.S. will support greater Kurdish empowerment. It will infuriate Erdogan and much of the Turkish establishment, but they’ll get the message.

Trump could also pressure Erdogan by cutting American intelligence and military support for the Turkish government. While Erdogan rails against U.S. foreign policy, the Turkish defense establishment is heavily reliant on American support. This support is especially important today because Erdogan has neglected Turkey’s military’s capabilities. Defense spending is low and politicization in the officer corps is rampant. Erdogan has weakened his nation. The cracks are simply papered over.

#related#As a last resort, Trump could even move to expel Turkey from NATO as part of his broader efforts to reform that alliance. Yes, it would be a significant step with unpredictable consequences. But if Erdogan wants to continue putting American-trained Turkish military officers in prison and serving as Russia’s puppet, he has no place in NATO anyway.

For a time, the United States was right to tolerate Erdogan’s eccentricity. In his early years, he balanced political Islam with an outstretched hand toward the West. But that time has now passed. Erdogan has gone off the deep end, and Trump must alter his perception of depth.

— Tom Rogan writes for National Review Online and Opportunity Lives. A former panelist on The McLaughlin Group, he is a senior fellow at the Steamboat Institute. He tweets @TomRTweets and his homepage is

Tom Rogan is a columnist for National Review Online, a contributor to the Washington Examiner, and a former panelist on The McLaughlin Group. Email him at

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Fox News Anchor Shepard Smith Resigns

Fox News Channel's chief anchor, Shepard Smith, announced on air Friday that he would be resigning from his post after 23 years with the network. “This is my last newscast here,” said Smith. “Recently, I asked the company to allow me to leave Fox News. After requesting that I stay, they obliged.” He ... Read More
NR Webathon

Don’t Let Michael Mann Succeed

I  enjoyed the running joke of Jarndyce v. Jarndyce in the great Dickens novel Bleak House, back when I first read it. Little did I know that one day I and the magazine that I love would effectively be caught up in a version of that interminable case, courtesy of a litigious climate scientist with zero regard ... Read More
White House

What Is Impeachment For?

W hat is impeachment for? Seems like a simple question. Constitutionally speaking, it also appears to have a simple answer: to cite and remove from power a president guilty of wrongdoing. Aye, there’s the rub. What sort of wrongdoing warrants removal from power? I’d wager that the flames of ... Read More

Beto Proposes to Oppress Church with State

Beto O’Rourke’s presidential campaign is within the margin of error of non-existence, but in his failure he has found a purpose: expressing the Democratic id. His latest bid for left-wing love came at a CNN forum on gay rights, where he said that churches that oppose same-sex marriage should have to pay ... Read More