Politics & Policy

Trump’s Speech Was Nothing to Celebrate

President Trump addresses a joint session of Congress, February 28, 2017. (Photo: Jim Lo Scalzo/Pool/Reuters)
Trump has set the bar so low that Republicans are celebrating his speech despite his clear departure from conservatism.

The morning after President Trump’s address to a joint session of Congress, the Dow Jones industrial average shot up 300 points, lifting the stock market above 21,000. But the excitement of the money managers couldn’t touch the ecstasy of conservative observers. John Hinderaker of the Power Line blog gushed that the speech was “tremendous” and “inspired” and Trump himself “magnificent.” Chris Wallace of Fox News dubbed the speech “one of the best ever by a president.” The Wall Street Journal’s James Freeman offered that Trump delivered “perhaps the most compelling moment in the history of presidential addresses.”

Whoa, when you frighten people into thinking you may not have the mental stability or emotional maturity to sit behind the Resolute desk, the first sign of normality can send them into raptures. Let’s see how long this lasts.

Before Tuesday, President Trump had given even well-wishers plenty of reasons for disquiet: the assertion of “alternative facts” regarding inauguration crowd sizes, the blatant misrepresentations about the Electoral College victory, the abrupt firing of General Michael Flynn followed by dark intimations that he’d been undone by the “media,” the public whining about Ivanka’s treatment at the hands of Nordstrom, the declaration of the press as the “enemy of the American people,” the incompetent rollout of a temporary ban on immigration from seven nations, and, remarkably, much more. The secretaries of State and Defense had to travel the world reassuring NATO that Trump did not mean to undermine the alliance, and assuring Iraq that, despite repeated assertions from the president, the U.S. was not, in fact, planning to steal Iraq’s oil.

So when President Trump delivered a speech to Congress free of the obsessions, insecurities, and intemperate attacks that too often characterize his public persona, he deserved praise. The speech (at last) included some of the necessary civilities that we expect from American leaders. He began by recognizing Black History Month and decrying anti-Semitism. For the first time, in my memory at least, he wove references to our founding and to freedom into his remarks. This accomplished two things: It gave the speech a reassuring tone, and it fit Trump into American traditions instead of in opposition to them. Most of all, though one can quibble about whether this was the proper setting, it did permit President Trump to salute a fallen American, and that too is a welcome departure from some of his earlier disparagements of military heroes.

But let’s keep our heads. It was not a great speech. In fact, from a conservative perspective, while there were some good proposals, it was evidence of how much ground has been lost.

On the positive side of the ledger, President Trump is rolling back regulations, which are like 50-pound weights on the ankles of American businesses. He plans to rebuild the depleted military, and he endorsed school choice, among other worthy policies.

But Republicans were once the party of fiscal responsibility – or at least, they tried to be. The Democrats were the party that promised the moon —free college, free child care, paid family leave — all subsidized by taxes on the rich.

The Trumpublicans are now overtaking the Democrats in the race to bankrupt the country. Trump promised a new $1 trillion infrastructure spending bill; a plan to destroy ISIS; a “great, great” wall on the southern border; paid family leave; “affordable and accessible” child care; more help for veterans; more spending on women’s health; a replacement for Obamacare that will deliver better care at lower prices; and more. And where the Democrats (totally unrealistically, to be sure) promised to raise taxes on the rich to pay for their wish list, the Trumpublicans are planning to cut taxes on corporations and provide “massive tax relief” for the middle class. If there was even a nod to how all of this will affect the public fisc, I missed it.

And while Trump’s delivery was measured and non-hysterical, his speech was not entirely free of “alternative facts.” We did not spend “$6 trillion in the Middle East.” The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq cost $1.6 trillion. Too many people are out of work, but to say that “94 million Americans are out of the labor force” is highly misleading. Nearly all of those 94 million are retired, students, the disabled, or homemakers. Refocusing immigration policy to favor the highly skilled seems sensible, and rapidly deporting criminals is only common sense. But it is not the case that our crime problem is disproportionately due to immigrants, and the Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement is not only a clunky name, it’s unworthy scapegoating.

More than fiscal responsibility, conservatism is founded upon modesty about what government can achieve. As the Republicans rose to cheer “Every problem can be solved,” we saw that insight go out the window.

— Mona Charen is a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center. Copyright © 2017 Creators.com&

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Fox News Anchor Shepard Smith Resigns

Fox News Channel's chief anchor, Shepard Smith, announced on air Friday that he would be resigning from his post after 23 years with the network. “This is my last newscast here,” said Smith. “Recently, I asked the company to allow me to leave Fox News. After requesting that I stay, they obliged.” He ... Read More
NR Webathon

Don’t Let Michael Mann Succeed

I  enjoyed the running joke of Jarndyce v. Jarndyce in the great Dickens novel Bleak House, back when I first read it. Little did I know that one day I and the magazine that I love would effectively be caught up in a version of that interminable case, courtesy of a litigious climate scientist with zero regard ... Read More
White House

What Is Impeachment For?

W hat is impeachment for? Seems like a simple question. Constitutionally speaking, it also appears to have a simple answer: to cite and remove from power a president guilty of wrongdoing. Aye, there’s the rub. What sort of wrongdoing warrants removal from power? I’d wager that the flames of ... Read More

Beto Proposes to Oppress Church with State

Beto O’Rourke’s presidential campaign is within the margin of error of non-existence, but in his failure he has found a purpose: expressing the Democratic id. His latest bid for left-wing love came at a CNN forum on gay rights, where he said that churches that oppose same-sex marriage should have to pay ... Read More