‘March for Science’ Attempts ‘Female’ Outreach — Only to Offend People over Use of the Word ‘Female’

(Photo: Kiosea39/Dreamstime)
This is absurd — especially considering that the March for Science’s intent was very clearly a feminist one.

An environmentalist group, March for Science, posted a tweet asking “female[s]” who had changed their minds about engineering careers to offer suggestions for how to make the field more welcoming to women — only to end up having to apologize for using the word “female.”

“Are you a female who thought about doing engineering but decided against it?” the apparently offensive tweet, which was posted February 23, asked.

“Why?” it continued. “What can the science community do better? #ScienceMarch”

Although some women did respond with their earnest suggestions, the replies to the tweet were flooded with people who were upset about the use of the word “female.”

Some were upset for grammatical reasons, arguing that “female” was an adjective and not a noun.

(Note: Both Merriam-Webster Online and state that the word can be used as both an an adjective and a noun.)

Others were upset because the use of the word “female” to mean “woman” reminded them of what a “Ferengi” would do:

(Note: I googled “Ferengi” and it apparently has something to do with Star Trek, which is apparently a show that some people actually watch.)

Others went so far as to say that the tweet’s use of the word “female” suggests that the folks at March for Science do not see women as actually being human beings:

Apparently, the outrage was so significant that it prompted the March for Science to issue a five-part apology, begging for forgiveness for its “problematic tweets” and any “harm [they] caused.”

Now — as I sit here typing this with both of my feet on my desk chair at the office — I can willingly admit that I’m not the best resource when it comes to manners. So, although nothing about March of Science’s tweet bothered me personally, I can recognize that the people who identified it as being “rude” probably had a point. After all, when it comes to “Victorian etiquette,” I know absolutely nothing other than that a situation where I’d be expected to adhere to it sounds terrifying to me.

But still, I kind of feel like making the jump from “rude” to “dehumanizing” is pretty absurd — especially considering that the March for Science’s intent was very clearly a feminist one. It’s almost (almost!) as if this falls under the category of “There’s just no pleasing these people.”

This story was previously reported on in an article on Heat Street.

Most Popular


The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More
Film & TV

Why We Can’t Have Wakanda

SPOILERS AHEAD Black Panther is a really good movie that lives up to the hype in just about every way. Surely someone at Marvel Studios had an early doubt, reading the script and thinking: “Wait, we’re going to have hundreds of African warriors in brightly colored tribal garb, using ancient weapons, ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Science & Tech

Set NASA Free

The Trump administration has proposed shifting the International Space Station from a NASA-exclusive research facility to a semi-public, semi-private one. Its plan would nix all government funding for the ISS by 2025 and award at least $150 million per year to NASA to help with the transition. This would be a ... Read More