Al Gore’s Lincoln Lie

(Reuters photo: Lucy Nicholson)
His bogus quotation has been thoroughly debunked, but Gore pretends it’s still valid.

Al Gore is worried about “alternative facts,” “disinformation campaigns,” and “intentionally falsified information.” At least he says so in a new and updated edition of The Assault on Reason, his decade-old book on how Democrats tell the truth and Republicans don’t. In the paperback version published last week, Gore adds that since President Trump’s election, a “feeling of unease about our democracy has deepened considerably.”

My own feeling of unease also has deepened, but mostly over the former vice president’s ongoing struggles with the truth.

When The Assault on Reason originally came out in 2007, Gore blasted money in politics and quoted Abraham Lincoln:

I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country. As a result of the war, corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign . . . until all wealth is aggregated in a few hands.

The passage continues: “I feel at this moment more anxiety for the safety of my country than ever before, even in the midst of war. God grant that my suspicions may prove groundless.”

It’s a doozy of a quote from one of America’s great statesmen, foreshadowing concerns about capitalist greed that have animated progressives such as Gore from the early years of the 20th century to Bernie Sanders’ Twitter feed.

It’s also fake — and Gore knows it.

He probably didn’t know it back in 2007. In the first edition of his book, Gore included a footnote. It references a “Letter to Col. William F. Elkins,” written in 1864 and mentioned in The Lincoln Encyclopedia, a 1950 reference guide edited by Archer H. Shaw, an Ohio journalist. This much is true: The quote appears in Shaw’s compendium, which in turn cites a 1930 book that offers no source.

Yet there is one. John Hay and John Nicolay — secretaries to Lincoln who published their former boss’s collected writings — traced it to an 1888 pamphlet. Then they denounced it as a forgery. (The historian Thomas F. Schwartz described their investigation in a 1999 newsletter of the Abraham Lincoln Association.)

Gore is not a scholar. Either he or a researcher likely stumbled across the Lincoln quote, found it useful, and verified it in a volume that, to their amateur eyes, looked authoritative. Everyone makes mistakes, and this one surely was made in good faith.

But then Gore got called on it, as often happens when someone prints this phony Lincoln line. In 2007, the author and journalist Andrew Ferguson debunked it in the Washington Post.

Now, ten years later, we have a 2017 edition of The Assault on Reason, revised to include a new preface plus a new final chapter. Despite these renovations, the bogus Lincoln quote still shows up on page 88.

Today, however, Gore knows that he’s peddling a lie. Ten years ago, in more innocent times, he introduced the quote by writing that Lincoln “perceived the dangers” of corporate power and “noted” them in his 1864 letter. In the new version, however, Gore pulls back from his assertion: “Lincoln may have perceived the dangers” of corporate power, “and some historians attribute the following statement to him.” (Emphasis added.)

Good historians know the truth. So does Gore — but rather than fix an error, he now chooses to spread rotten information. Even his old footnote remains, unchanged.

Perhaps this is a nitpicky point that only fussy academics can appreciate. Gore, however, seeks to make a larger point about the health of our democracy. In the final chapter of the new edition of The Assault on Reason, he puts it this way: “When both sides in a political conflict claim expertise and cite allegedly authoritative sources to label the assertions of the other side as false, then it should not be surprising that voters begin to develop cynicism and even contempt for any and all claims of expertise.”

Nope, it shouldn’t surprise anybody at all.

— John J. Miller is the national correspondent for National Review, the director of the Dow Journalism Program at Hillsdale College, and the author of The First Assassin, a novel set in Lincoln’s Washington.


John J. Miller is the national correspondent for National Review and the director of the Dow Journalism Program at Hillsdale College. His new book is Reading Around: Journalism on Authors, Artists, and Ideas.

Most Popular

White House

The Trivialization of Impeachment

We have a serious governance problem. Our system is based on separation of powers, because liberty depends on preventing any component of the state from accumulating too much authority -- that’s how tyrants are born. For the system to work, the components have to be able to check each other: The federal and ... Read More

Put Up or Shut Up on These Accusations, Hillary

Look, one 2016 candidate being prone to wild and baseless accusations is enough. Appearing on Obama campaign manager David Plouffe’s podcast, Hillary Clinton suggested that 2016 Green Party candidate Jill Stein was a “Russian asset,” that Republicans and Russians were promoting the Green Party, and ... Read More

Feminists Have Turned on Pornography

Since the sexual revolution of the 1960s, the feminist movement has sought to condemn traditional sexual ethics as repressive, misogynistic, and intolerant. As the 2010s come to a close, it might be fair to say that mainstream culture has reached the logical endpoint of this philosophy. Whereas older Americans ... Read More
PC Culture

Defiant Dave Chappelle

When Dave Chappelle’s Netflix special Sticks & Stones came out in August, the overwhelming response from critics was that it was offensive, unacceptable garbage. Inkoo Kang of Slate declared that Chappelle’s “jokes make you wince.” Garrett Martin, in the online magazine Paste, maintained that the ... Read More

‘Texodus’ Bodes Badly for Republicans

‘I am a classically trained engineer," says Representative Will Hurd, a Texas Republican, "and I firmly believe in regression to the mean." Applying a concept from statistics to the randomness of today's politics is problematic. In any case, Hurd, 42, is not waiting for the regression of our politics from the ... Read More
White House

The Impeachment Defense That Doesn’t Work

If we’ve learned anything from the last couple of weeks, it’s that the “perfect phone call” defense of Trump and Ukraine doesn’t work. As Andy and I discussed on his podcast this week, the “perfect” defense allows the Democrats to score easy points by establishing that people in the administration ... Read More