Culture

Copy, Paste, Enter Stanford University

Ziad Ahmed with Hillary Clinton (Photo via Instagram)
A qualified black student could fill the slot taken by the pro-black applicant whose ‘essay’ was a lame display of duplication.

Ziad Ahmed is one lucky young man. Earlier this month, Stanford University invited him to join its Class of 2021. While this alone is a huge and rare honor, what generated headlines was the essay on Ahmed’s application. Asked “What matters to you, and why?” the Princeton, N.J., high-school senior wrote: “#BlackLivesMatter.” And then he repeated it 100 times.

“I didn’t think I would get admitted to Stanford at all, but it’s quite refreshing to see that they view my unapologetic activism as an asset rather than a liability,” Ahmed told Sarah A. Harvard of the website Mic. Ahmed, a Muslim American of Bangladeshi descent, pointed out why his essay was nothing more than an exercise in mindless duplication:

“The insistence on an explanation is inherently dehumanizing,” he said. “Black lives have been explicitly and implicitly told they don’t matter for centuries, and as a society — it is our responsibility to scream that black lives matter because it is not to say that all lives do not matter, but it is to say that black lives have been attacked for so long, and that we must empower through language, perspective, and action.”

Now that prose, whether you consider Black Lives Matter a civil-rights organization or a band of racial arsonists who inspire fatal attacks on law-enforcement officers, would have been worthy of a college-admissions application. Instead, Ahmed, who interned on Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign, produced something reminiscent of the sets of standards that Bart Simpson writes on the chalkboard at Springfield Elementary School. For instance:

I saw nothing unusual in the faculty lounge.

I saw nothing unusual in the faculty lounge.

I saw nothing unusual in the faculty lounge.

I saw nothing unusual in the faculty lounge.

I saw nothing unusual in the faculty lounge.

I saw nothing unusual in the faculty lounge.

Ahmed’s “essay” also recalls a shocking scene in Stanley Kubrick’s 1980 thriller The Shining. Mentally disturbed author Jack Torrance (menacingly portrayed by Jack Nicholson) has been very busy writing his new novel on his typewriter. It turns out that page after page after page of his manuscript reads:

All work and no play make Jack a dull boy.

All work and no play make Jack a dull boy.

All work and no play make Jack a dull boy.

All work and no play make Jack a dull boy.

All work and no play make Jack a dull boy.

All work and no play make Jack a dull boy.

It would have been one thing if Ahmed had composed a coherent essay on why he supports Black Lives Matter. He could have presented an argument and supported it with evidence and passion. He could have been persuasive and maybe even educational.

Instead, he cut and pasted a hashtag — 100 times.

How brilliant.

This is the mind-numbingly repetitive analog to the story about the student who sees this question on his Philosophy 101 final exam: “What is courage?” He simply writes: “This is.”

One wonders if Stanford would have accepted a pro-police student who had written 100 times, “Blue lives matter.” How about an applicant whose essay read 100 times “The South shall rise again”? Would Microsoft Word’s cut-and-paste function have worked its magic in those cases?

Ziad Ahmed is incredibly fortunate to have been accepted by Stanford. That distinguished university, with which I have been affiliated as a media fellow at the Hoover Institution on War, Revolution, and Peace, has a finite number of spots for incoming freshmen. Ahmed, who is not black, was offered a seat that could be filled by an equally or more qualified black applicant who bothered to write an actual admissions essay. In this sense, Ziad Ahmed’s accomplishment is not just outrageous. It is a genuine example of racial injustice.

— Deroy Murdock is a Manhattan-based Fox News contributor and a contributing editor of National Review Online.

READ MORE:

Deroy Murdock is a Manhattan-based Fox News contributor and a contributing editor of National Review Online, and a senior fellow with the London Center for Policy Research.

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

The Roger Stone Sentencing Fiasco

The first thing to grasp about the Roger Stone sentencing fiasco is that Stone, even accepting the worst plausible gloss on his crimes, is a 67-year-old nonviolent first offender. If the criminal-justice “reform” fad were authentic, and not a stratagem of social-justice warriors who have taken Washington’s ... Read More
Law & the Courts

The Roger Stone Sentencing Fiasco

The first thing to grasp about the Roger Stone sentencing fiasco is that Stone, even accepting the worst plausible gloss on his crimes, is a 67-year-old nonviolent first offender. If the criminal-justice “reform” fad were authentic, and not a stratagem of social-justice warriors who have taken Washington’s ... Read More
Elections

Hunter Biden’s Devastating Influence

Tomorrow is Valentine’s Day — grab roses or chocolate or something on the way home from work today. They’ll be more expensive tomorrow. On the menu today: the fair question of whether Hunter Biden cost his father the Democratic nomination; Bernie Sanders warns Democrats not to try any funny business at ... Read More
Elections

Hunter Biden’s Devastating Influence

Tomorrow is Valentine’s Day — grab roses or chocolate or something on the way home from work today. They’ll be more expensive tomorrow. On the menu today: the fair question of whether Hunter Biden cost his father the Democratic nomination; Bernie Sanders warns Democrats not to try any funny business at ... Read More