Economy & Business

Our Fight for ‘Butter Freedom’

(Photo: Edward Phillips/Dreamstime)
Wisconsinites don’t need licensed taste testers to certify which butters they may buy.

Wisconsin is well known as the Dairy State, and — as demonstrated by Green Bay Packer fans wearing foam-cheese wedges as hats — its citizens are justly proud of that moniker. But when government takes a good thing like dairy prowess and tries to make it mandatory, the result is not pretty. Recently the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty sued the state of Wisconsin to win “butter freedom” for the state’s consumers and retailers.

At issue is the freedom of Wisconsin retailers and consumers to sell and purchase butters that do not include a butter grade as determined by a licensed butter taste tester. The grade has nothing to do with the health and safety or even nutritional value of the butter. It is nothing but a compulsory government “taste test.” Unless a butter is submitted to the taste testers and labeled with the result, retailers can’t sell it in the state.

Apart from the obnoxious notion that Wisconsin consumers must be told by the government whether a food “tastes good,” the law has prevented Wisconsin grocers from selling certain butters — most notably those produced internationally that cannot be readily graded. The most prominent example is the popular Kerrygold butter, made in Ireland. Kerrygold claims to produce a “silky and creamy” butter with a “healthy, golden yellow” glow.

One might think that Wisconsin consumers and retailers are more than capable of deciding how “silky” and “golden yellow” Kerrygold butter really is. But they won’t get a chance unless a bureaucrat gets to try it first and stamp his opinion on the package. As a result, our clients and other Wisconsinites have been forced to travel to other states — often to Illinois — on “Kerrygold runs” in search of the creamy contraband. This isn’t new to Wisconsin. In the mid 20th century, its citizens made “oleo” runs to Illinois because state law prohibited the sale of margarine colored yellow.

Our lawsuit — aided by the preternatural silliness of the law and the fact that it was announced on St. Patrick’s Day — has resulted in a significant amount of attention and generated a bit of fun. We’re happy go along and acknowledge that butter freedom may not be the most pressing civil-rights issue of our time. But economic liberty is. When the state erects artificial barriers to the entry of goods and services, businesses and consumers bear the ultimate burden. In the most extreme examples, individuals are prevented from earning a living, and consumers are prohibited from obtaining the most competitive prices for goods and services.

We acknowledge that the state must have room to enact economic regulations. But when the government restricts the freedom to engage in otherwise lawful businesses or transactions — particularly when it compels the communication of a message such as the result of a government taste test — there must be some meaningful justification for doing so. In addition, that justification cannot be protection of local or otherwise preferred businesses. Our freedoms to work as we wish and to purchase what we want ought not to be completely at the mercy of the government and the special interests that often control it.

We have all the confidence in the world that Wisconsin’s butter producers can compete with the likes of Kerrygold. But the government should not place its thumb — or boot — on the scale. It ought to allow Wisconsin’s citizens to decide — and let them eat butter.

— Rick Esenberg is the president and general counsel of the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty. Jake Curtis is an associate counsel at the Institute’s Center for Competitive Federalism.

READ MORE:

 

Most Popular

Culture

White Cats and Black Swans

Making a film of Cats is a bold endeavor — it is a musical with no real plot, based on T. S. Eliot’s idea of child-appropriate poems, and old Tom was a strange cat indeed. Casting Idris Elba as the criminal cat Macavity seems almost inevitable — he has always made a great gangster — but I think there was ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The White Ghetto

Editor's Note: In celebration of Kevin D. Williamson’s newest book, The Smallest Minority: Independent Thinking in the Age of Mob Politics, National Review is republishing some of our favorites of his from the past ten years. This article originally appeared in the December 16, 2013, issue of National ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Other Case against Reparations

Reparations are an ethical disaster. Proceeding from a doctrine of collective guilt, they are the penalty for slavery and Jim Crow, sins of which few living Americans stand accused. An offense against common sense as well as morality, reparations would take from Bubba and give to Barack, never mind if the former ... Read More
Politics & Policy

May I See Your ID?

Identity is big these days, and probably all days: racial identity, ethnic identity, political identity, etc. Tribalism. It seems to be baked into the human cake. Only the consciously, persistently religious, or spiritual, transcend it, I suppose. (“There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor ... Read More
Health Care

The Puzzling Problem of Vaping

San Francisco -- A 29-story office building at 123 Mission Street illustrates the policy puzzles that fester because of these facts: For centuries, tobacco has been a widely used, legal consumer good that does serious and often lethal harm when used as it is intended to be used. And its harmfulness has been a ... Read More