National Security & Defense

Three Key Questions after the Manchester Bombing

Armed police officers stand near the Manchester Arena (Reuters: Andrew Yates)
After last night’s mayhem, look for the U.K. to respond with force.

Twenty-two people were killed and at least 59 wounded in last night’s terrorist attack on an Ariana Grande concert in Manchester. England’s third most populous city, Manchester is known for its soccer teams, its social vibrancy, and its diverse architecture.

With the passage of time, the city’s response to last night’s mayhem will surely reinforce Manchester’s positive reality. But it will take time. The scale of loss, many of the wounded are in critical condition; the target, a large social gathering; and the identities of the dead, over a dozen children and young adults, will pain Britain’s psyche.

Still, the key to public reassurance is an efficient investigation and response. Here are three connected considerations.

Who is the attacker?

According to reports, the British government knows the bomber’s identity. That’s unsurprising. As I noted following the March car and knife attack in London, “British counterterrorism authorities retain a highly advanced database of jihadists and their sympathizers.” The attacker was almost certainly on the intelligence radar. But the fact that his bomb was so well-constructed and effective should alarm British authorities. In recent years, the U.K. has successfully disrupted numerous explosive-centric terrorist plots. The British have done so by employing sensitive intelligence tools to identify an individual’s bomb-making aspirations and his or her purchasing of explosive precursors.

Clearly, however, those tools didn’t work this time. That’s not to say that MI5 or the North West Counter Terrorism Unit dropped the ball. But the attack does indicate trained skill and practiced operational security. I think it is likely the attacker received training abroad. That leads us to the next question.

Is an international terrorist organization responsible?

Daesh (also known as ISIS) has claimed responsibility for the attack. While al-Qaeda–aligned cells have previously attracted counterterrorism concern in Manchester, Daesh’s claim here is credible. First, Daesh’s claim of responsibility was rapid but also specific in detail. Second, the explosive device(s) suggests a TATP-base-plus-shrapnel design similar to those used in the Daesh attacks on Brussels and Paris (the serious and critical status of many of the wounded also points toward a sophisticated bomb). Third, Daesh has prioritized attacking Britain and has invested significant resources towards that end.

As authorities run down the attacker’s friends and hangouts, expect more arrests today and tomorrow.

Moreover, while it is possible that the bomber was acting alone, that is far from certain. We know that Daesh utilizes compartmented cells so as to mitigate intelligence attention. And the complexity involved here does, at least at first glance, suggest a support network. There are indications that Daesh operates such networks in the U.K. Correspondingly, as authorities run down the attacker’s friends and hangouts, expect more arrests today and tomorrow. The British will want to know if the bomber had help. Organizational involvement will also be indicated if Britain’s Joint Terrorism Analysis Center raises the national alert level to critical.

How will Britain respond?

At the domestic level, the U.K. has immediately increased police counterterrorism deployments. And fortunately, British intelligence services are far better integrated than their U.S. counterparts. But if the investigation points to a broader cell, the U.K. will likely need to forward deploy troop-size elements of British Special Forces to areas outside of London. Beyond the capital, British armed-police capabilities are relatively weak (most British police do not carry firearms).

It is abroad, however, where we may see the most visible U.K. reaction. While British Special Forces are already operating in Syria, the U.K. has not yet deployed conventional forces to fight Daesh in the vein of the U.S. deployments around Raqqah. That might now change. British Army light-infantry forces (such as 16 Air Assault Brigade) would be well placed to support the retaking of Daesh’s capital. And because of the grotesque quality to this attack, public support for such deployments will be significant.

Regardless, we’ll learn a lot more over the next 24 hours.

READ MORE:

World Terrorism is Becoming Familiar to Us

How Many Times Will We Gasp in Horror at Acts of Terror?

Barriers Aren’t Sufficient Against Suicide Bombers

Tom Rogan is a columnist for National Review Online, a contributor to the Washington Examiner, and a former panelist on The McLaughlin Group. Email him at TRogan@McLaughlin.com

Most Popular

Film & TV

Knives Out Takes On the Anti-Immigration Crowd

Since the beginning of the Obama era, the Left has broadcast two contradictory messages on the subjects of race and immigration. The first is that a so-called Coalition of the Ascendant will inevitably displace white Americans as the dominant force in the country’s politics and culture. The second is that ... Read More
Film & TV

Knives Out Takes On the Anti-Immigration Crowd

Since the beginning of the Obama era, the Left has broadcast two contradictory messages on the subjects of race and immigration. The first is that a so-called Coalition of the Ascendant will inevitably displace white Americans as the dominant force in the country’s politics and culture. The second is that ... Read More
From left: Harvard University's Noah Feldman, Stanford University's Pamela Karlan, University of North Carolina's Michael Gerhardt, and George Washington University's Jonathan Turley testify before the House Judiciary Committee hearing on the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump, December 4, 2019.

The Impeachment Eye Test

To put it mildly, the 1960s were not notorious for juridical modesty. They might compare favorably, though, to Wednesday’s episode of “The Lawyer Left Does Impeachment” at the House Judiciary Committee. Oh, I have no doubt that the three progressive constitutional scholars spotlighted by Democrats yearn in ... Read More
From left: Harvard University's Noah Feldman, Stanford University's Pamela Karlan, University of North Carolina's Michael Gerhardt, and George Washington University's Jonathan Turley testify before the House Judiciary Committee hearing on the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump, December 4, 2019.

The Impeachment Eye Test

To put it mildly, the 1960s were not notorious for juridical modesty. They might compare favorably, though, to Wednesday’s episode of “The Lawyer Left Does Impeachment” at the House Judiciary Committee. Oh, I have no doubt that the three progressive constitutional scholars spotlighted by Democrats yearn in ... Read More
Culture

The Absurd Crusade against the Salvation Army

We all know some individuals who are so obviously good and kind that we are certain if anyone were to dislike them, that's all we would need to know about the person. We would immediately assume he or she is a bad person. To hate the manifestly good is a sure sign of being bad. Such is the case regarding the ... Read More
Culture

The Absurd Crusade against the Salvation Army

We all know some individuals who are so obviously good and kind that we are certain if anyone were to dislike them, that's all we would need to know about the person. We would immediately assume he or she is a bad person. To hate the manifestly good is a sure sign of being bad. Such is the case regarding the ... Read More
Elections

It’s Not Because She’s a Woman

In early October, Elizabeth Warren hit her stride. Her stock in the Democratic primary had been climbing steadily since midsummer, and as Joe Biden continued to lag, the Massachusetts senator became the first presidential hopeful to overtake him as front-runner in the RealClearPolitics polling average. She’s ... Read More
Elections

It’s Not Because She’s a Woman

In early October, Elizabeth Warren hit her stride. Her stock in the Democratic primary had been climbing steadily since midsummer, and as Joe Biden continued to lag, the Massachusetts senator became the first presidential hopeful to overtake him as front-runner in the RealClearPolitics polling average. She’s ... Read More
Film & TV

Clint Eastwood’s Messy, Nuanced Triumph

After a pipe bomb exploded at a concert held to celebrate the 1996 Olympics in Atlanta’s Centennial Park, the FBI came to suspect that the security guard who discovered the device might have planted it to gain a reputation as a hero. The knotty story of that security guard, Richard Jewell, does not lend itself ... Read More
Film & TV

Clint Eastwood’s Messy, Nuanced Triumph

After a pipe bomb exploded at a concert held to celebrate the 1996 Olympics in Atlanta’s Centennial Park, the FBI came to suspect that the security guard who discovered the device might have planted it to gain a reputation as a hero. The knotty story of that security guard, Richard Jewell, does not lend itself ... Read More
White House

Nancy Pelosi’s Case

Further to the post below, a couple of thoughts on Nancy Pelosi’s statement yesterday. She said this near the beginning: During the constitutional convention, James Madison, the architect of the Constitution, warned that a president might betray his trust to foreign powers which might prove fatal to the ... Read More
White House

Nancy Pelosi’s Case

Further to the post below, a couple of thoughts on Nancy Pelosi’s statement yesterday. She said this near the beginning: During the constitutional convention, James Madison, the architect of the Constitution, warned that a president might betray his trust to foreign powers which might prove fatal to the ... Read More