National Security & Defense

A Strong Russia Sanctions Bill

Russian President Vladimir Putin, Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu and Russian ground forces commander Colonel-General Oleg Salyukov (Reuters: Yuri Kochetkov/Pool)

In December, an outgoing President Barack Obama imposed a series of sanctions on Russia by executive order — overdue retaliation for the Kremlin’s brazen efforts to influence the 2016 presidential election. On Wednesday, the Senate voted 97–2 to codify those sanctions and others into law, and prevent President Trump, who has been alarmingly warm toward the authoritarian regime in Moscow, from undoing them at will. At a moment when America’s policy toward a geopolitical adversary seems up for grabs, this is an important reassertion of tough-mindedness toward Moscow.

The sanctions language, hammered out by a coalition of Republican and Democratic senators, is surprisingly robust. The sanctions imposed by President Obama targeted two Russian intelligence agencies — the GRU and the FSB – as well as three companies that provided them material support, and four GRU officers. While keeping those sanctions in place, the amendment expands sanctions to Russia’s all-important energy sector, including its railways and mining operations. Under the proposed bill, any energy project involving a Russian company, as well as any foreign firm that makes a sizable investment in Russia’s attempt to develop next-generation oil-procurement capacities, is liable to sanctions. In a country whose economic fortunes are heavily dependent on oil, this could prove a significant blow, provided it is aggressively enforced.

Discretionary sanctions also apply to investment in the construction of Russian energy-export pipelines — for example, the controversial Nord Stream II pipeline. This massive project, which would link Russia to Germany while bypassing Ukraine, would double the Russian natural-gas company Gazprom’s capacity to move oil directly into Europe and make the Continent even more dependent on Russian resources.

Additionally, and no less significantly, the bill mandates sanctions on any person or entity “that engages in a significant transaction with a person that is part of, or operates for or on behalf of, the defense or intelligence sectors of the Government of the Russian Federation.” Russia accounts for about 8 percent of annual global arms sales, and Moscow has been making heavy investments in its military capacities. Under this bill, the Treasury Department would have substantial power to punish companies that contribute to Russia’s military buildup.

The amendment reportedly has not thrilled the White House, which wants to retain its unilateral authority to impose and lift sanctions. However, the sanctions language was authored by Idaho Republican Mike Crapo, and it is attached to a sanctions bill targeting Iran, authored by Tennessee Republican Bob Corker. Assuming that the bill arrives on the president’s desk essentially unchanged, it would make for an awkward situation: To preserve his current latitude, President Trump would have to reject a Republican-sponsored bill that also tightens the screws on the Iranian regime he himself wants to squeeze.

House Republicans, to smooth the road, might be inclined to soften the bill’s Russia-related provisions. They shouldn’t. We know that sanctions can have an effect: U.S. and European Union sanctions, combined with plummeting oil prices, pushed Russia into a recession in 2015. We also need to push back hard against a Russia that engages in more and more aggressive adventures abroad, especially in Ukraine and Syria. This bill sends a clear signal to Moscow and to our Western European allies, even if the administration has at times seemed painfully conflicted.

It is, in the end, because of the White House that Congress has chosen to reassert this authority. The president’s unwillingness to make firm commitments to keep President Obama’s sanctions in place or to pledge America’s continued support to its NATO obligations has created widespread anxiety at a precarious time. Republicans and Democrats agree — and almost unanimously — that this is no time to go wobbly. When this bill comes to the president’s desk, he should sign it, and join the consensus against Putin’s regime.

The Editors — The Editors comprise the senior editorial staff of the National Review magazine and website.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
Elections

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More
U.S.

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More