Culture

U.K. Police Force Vows to Ban Anyone Who Posts ‘Offensive’ Material on Twitter

(Photo: Richard Thomas/Dreamstime)
Handing power over to the government is not the right way to deal with Internet abuse.

The Wiltshire Police in the United Kingdom posted a tweet promising to go after people for “spewing abuse” on the Internet — then, when people criticized it, promised to ban any account that had posted anything “offensive.” The initial tweet, posted on Monday, stated:

Now, some people would look at all of this and see a police force that’s making the Internet a better place, one that’s free from the unhinged hatred of those mouth-breathing, neckbeard-sporting, basement-dwelling trolls. Personally, though, I find it to be pretty scary — yes, even more scary than the trolls themselves. 

Don’t get me wrong: I am absolutely not trying to minimize the psychological impact that the work of Internet trolls can have on the people they target, if those people choose to read what the trolls write. The things that some of these freaks feel the need to say to complete strangers behind their keyboards are nothing short of horrific, and I know this from experience. (If you don’t believe me, just take a look at my mentions.) 

Yes, an Internet without trolls certainly would be more comfortable, and a policy like this may seem tempting — but the truth is, there’s just no comfort that’s worth giving the government the power to ban “offensive” speech. Why? Because what is or is not “offensive” is an entirely subjective matter; something that one person finds offensive, another person might find funny, or even virtuous. The only criteria for deciding whether or not something is “offensive” is the personal sensibilities of the individual or individuals making that decision — and no one should ever give their government the power to block speech based on the feelings of its members. 

A better solution to dealing with Internet abuse is to either make fun of it or ignore it. I know that this can be tough to do. As a television host, my mentions are routinely flooded with horrific garbage. There have been milder things, such as “she adds nothing to this show” or “what is that blond chick supposed to be a specialist in? Being an idiot????” and, of course, more intense ones, like this person who told me that my mom died because I’m such a terrible person. With the exception of actual, credible death threats, though — with very specific, strict criteria outlined in United States law —  I’d never want the government to get involved to stop any of it. It’s tough to look and, and it can be even harder to ignore, but I’d much rather do my best to block abuse myself than give the government greater power to limit what I should be allowed to say. 

 

Most Popular

Elections

The Georgia Smear

Back in 2016, when Trump refused to say he’d necessarily accept the result if he lost, we were told that this was a terrible violation of democratic norms. Now, refusing to accept that you lost an election is the highest form of patriotism. Not only are the media and the Left not pressuring Stacey Abrams to ... Read More
PC Culture

The Lonely Mob

Just before the election, an Andrew Gillum intern named Shelby Shoup was arrested and charged with battery after assaulting some college Republicans on the campus of Florida State University. It was rather less exciting than that sounds: She went on a rant about “Nazis” and “fascism” — Gillum’s ... Read More
World

How Immigration Changes Britain

Almost nothing is discussed as badly in America or Europe as the subject of immigration. And one reason is that it remains almost impossible to have any sensible or rational public discussion of its consequences. Or rather it is eminently possible to have a discussion about the upsides (“diversity,” talent, ... Read More
Elections

Sorry, Brian Kemp Still Won

Here was the state of play as of yesterday per the Kemp campaign’s breakdown of publicly available information: As of Saturday, November 10, 2018 (12:00 p.m.) *Information below is public.  Total votes reported: 3,924,658 Kemp: 1,975,162 (50.33%) Abrams: 1,912,383 (48.73%) Metz: ... Read More