Economy & Business

The Trump Administration Believes in the Dignity of Work

HHS Secretary Tom Price on Capitol Hill in March (Reuters photo: Joshua Roberts)
The harmful practice of encouraging waivers from welfare work requirements is being rescinded.

Major bipartisan accomplishments in federal policy feel like a rarity these days. But it was just over 20 years ago that the parties came together to pass significant, positive reforms to our nation’s cash assistance program for families in poverty. The 1996 welfare-reform law, passed by a Republican Congress and signed by President Bill Clinton, significantly strengthened work requirements in a new program, now known as Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF).

In the years following the law’s enactment, child-poverty rates dropped significantly and employment among poor mothers increased, while teen pregnancy and abortion rates continued to fall. Policies that encouraged work succeeded in achieving the intended, positive result: fewer Americans in poverty and more Americans providing for themselves.

That is why it was so disappointing that the Obama administration chose to issue guidance in 2012 encouraging states to apply for waivers from the TANF work requirements — undermining a law that had a proven track record of benefiting our most vulnerable fellow citizens.

President Trump and this administration believe in promoting work, not dependency, and in building on the success of the bipartisan 1996 welfare-reform law, not dismantling it. So this week, the Trump administration rescinded the previous administration’s guidance that encouraged states to pursue work-requirement waivers.

At the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) — which runs the TANF program — we are looking closely at ways to better encourage and support work. It is integral to the health and well-being of individuals to support themselves and their families, to the extent possible, through work. If our welfare programs are not designed with that in mind, they are doing a disservice to the people they are intended to help.

Achieving this requires help from outside the federal government. We need significant buy-in from the states, which administer most welfare programs, as well as from the full spectrum of civil society. Helping Americans get back to work is not as simple as imposing a broad work requirement; it also means putting people at the center of our policies by thinking about what kind of unique support an individual might need to get back to work. States should strengthen the employment programs they run with TANF funding and focus on helping recipients reach self-sufficiency.

Everyone intuitively understands that people need good health in order to work, but fewer people think about how beneficial work can be to maintaining good health.

As a physician, I find this cause close to my heart. Everyone intuitively understands that people need good health in order to work, but fewer people think about how beneficial work can be to maintaining good health. Encouraging work is a fundamental part of our mission at HHS to improve the health and well-being of the American people.

There is a robust academic literature on this topic. A review of the evidence by the British government in 2006 found that employment is a big booster of physical and mental well-being. “There is a strong association between worklessness and poor health,” the British report found. Most important, people who “move off benefits and (re)-enter work generally experience improvements in income, socio-economic status, mental and general health, and well-being.”

As a successful businessman who has employed thousands of Americans, President Trump believes deeply in the dignity of work and the greatness of the American worker. That is just one more reason why this administration is so committed to putting work at the center of our vision for welfare programs. This week’s decision from HHS recognizes that the very best service we can provide for many Americans is not a government benefit but the opportunity to provide for themselves and their families.


The War on Work — and How to End It

Le Page’s Welfare Reform a Model for the Nation

Welfare Reform Can Flourish in the Post-Obama Era

Most Popular

Film & TV

Trolling America in HBO’s Euphoria

Of HBO’s new series Euphoria, its creator and writer Sam Levinson says, “There are going to be parents who are going to be totally f***ing freaked out.” There is no “but” coming. The freak-out is the point, at least if the premiere episode is to be believed. HBO needs a zeitgeist-capturing successor to ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Kamala Harris’s Dreadful DA Record

In 2005, the sharp-elbowed, ambitious district attorney of San Francisco had the opportunity to correct an all-too-common prosecutorial violation of duty that the leading expert on prosecutorial misconduct found “accounts for more miscarriages of justice than any other type of malpractice.” Rather than seize ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Case against Reparations

Editor’s Note: This piece was originally published on May 24, 2014. Ta-Nehisi Coates has done a public service with his essay “The Case for Reparations,” and the service he has done is to show that there is not much of a case for reparations. Mr. Coates’s beautifully written monograph is intelligent ... Read More
Film & TV

In Toy Story 4, the Franchise Shows Its Age

For a film franchise, 24 years is middle-aged, bordering on elderly. Nearly a quarter-century after the first Toy Story, the fourth installment, which hits theaters later this week, feels a bit tired. If earlier films in the franchise were about loss and abandonment and saying goodbye to childhood, this one is ... Read More

The China-Iran-Border Matrix

President Trump and Secretary Pompeo have worked the U.S. into an advantageous position with a consistent policy toward bad actors. We are now at a point that even left and right agree that China’s rogue trajectory had to be altered. And while progressive critics of Beijing now are coming out of the woodwork ... Read More