National Security & Defense

A Donald Trump Speech, a Barack Obama Foreign Policy

President Trump speaks at the United Nations General Assembly, September 19, 2017. (Reuters photo: Brendan McDermid)
There was much to like in Trump’s remarks to the U.N. But, especially in his case, actions speak louder than words.

I think I just watched a speech by a fictional president, a scene from some populist revival of The West Wing starring Donald Trump in the Martin Sheen role. In this episode, our hero went to the United Nations and finally gave those globalist technocrats a piece of the American mind. He called out our enemies. He delivered the kind of blunt talk that the U.N. never hears: a lesson on patriotism, a rejection of world government, and the best line about socialism ever spoken to a full gathering of the world’s foremost intergovernmental organization.

By the time Trump was finished, I half-expected to hear swelling music, followed by a focus group of “real Americans” yelling and pumping their fists. This was just what the United Nations needed to hear. This was just what our enemies needed to hear. Be afraid “Rocket Man.” Be very afraid.

Then, I flipped off the television and went back to real life, where the actual president of the United States is pursuing a foreign policy very, very much like the “globalist” presidents who came before him.

In just under nine months on the job, Donald Trump has re-certified the Iran deal, wrapped both his arms around Saudi Arabia, and pursued only a slightly more muscular version of the military offensive begun by Barack Obama in Iraq and Syria. He has provided enough troops to slightly improve conditions on the ground in Afghanistan if all goes well, but not nearly enough to turn the tide, so that our longest war is sure to continue apace. He’s reaffirmed his commitments to NATO. And he’s failed to initiate any real change in American relations with Russia and China.

Trump may have changed the tone of American policy, but he’s kept its substance largely the same.

“What about that change in tone?” you might respond. “Doesn’t stronger rhetoric have the potential to shake things up?”

Well, let’s ask “Rocket Man.”

In August, Trump declared that North Korea “best not make any more threats to the United States.” He said that the DPRK would “be met with fire, fury and frankly power the likes of which this world has never seen before” if it didn’t shape up.

Some Americans were terrified by these words, afraid that they would push an unstable ruler over the edge, provoking a (perhaps-nuclear) war. Others pumped their fists, exulting that there was a new sheriff in town to tell our enemies that we won’t be pushed around.

How did North Korea respond? It called Trump’s bluff. Since the fire-and-fury comment, North Korea has tested a hydrogen bomb and launched not one, but two missiles straight over the islands of Japan. Rocket Man is not intimidated, leaving president Trump stuck in the same rut as every other president since Eisenhower.

The Trump who gave the U.N. speech today sounded a bit like a grown-up version of the Trump on the campaign trail.

The Trump who gave the U.N. speech today sounded a bit like a grown-up version of the Trump on the campaign trail. The Trump in the Oval Office is the president of the status quo. He’s a man of the establishment.

To be sure, this is not all bad. Some of it, considering what could have happened, is quite good. By reaffirming America’s commitment to NATO and maintaining sanctions against Russia, he backtracked on two of his most reckless rhetorical flirtations from the campaign. He’s conducting military operations in accordance with the laws of war, which it wasn’t always clear he would. And he’s refusing to risk retreat in Afghanistan.

In short, he’s avoided the worst implications of “America First.” But, excepting his largely symbolic withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accords, he’s also avoided the best implications of “America First.” There are changes that should be made. He can and must take the risk of withdrawing from the Iran deal. He should reconsider America’s embrace of Saudi Arabia, and he must carefully consider whether American foreign policy needs a course correction in the Korean Peninsula.

So, how should you think of Trump at the U.N., then? The short answer is that you shouldn’t think much of it at all. If there’s one thing we’ve learned from this president, it’s that his speeches matter less than those of his peers. His promises aren’t worth the pixels they’re printed on; even his most stirring declaration might be undermined by his very next tweet.

Trump scored some rhetorical points today, but actions speak louder than words — and in his case, actions often bear no relation to words. So let’s obsess less over what our president says and pay closer attention to what he does. Key decisions await, Rocket Man watches, and we don’t yet know what Trump will do. There is much to like in today’s speech, but until he truly changes course, “principled realism” will be just another euphemism for the status quo.


Trumpian Rhetoric and U.S. Imperatives

Trump’s Successful U.N. Speech

’Holy Sh**’: Trump at the U.N.

— David French is a senior writer for National Review, a senior fellow at the National Review Institute, an attorney, and a veteran of Operation Iraqi Freedom.


David French — David French is a senior writer for National Review, a senior fellow at the National Review Institute, and a veteran of Operation Iraqi Freedom.

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More