Economy & Business

Trump’s Delicious Tax Cut

The GOP proposal is simpler and fairer than the status quo.

President Donald J. Trump last week promised Americans “a giant, beautiful, massive — the biggest ever in our country — tax cut.” As delicious as that sounds, Trump’s tax overhaul may be tastiest for what it makes tiny, appealing, and compact: the 1040 tax return.

If Washington Republicans manage not to botch tax reform — as they wrecked Obamacare repeal — simplification should be among the new system’s most attractive elements, along with its consolidation of seven tax rates to three: 12, 25, and 35 percent. Letting Americans keep more of their money should energize an economy finally awakening from the slumber of the Bush-Obama years.

House Speaker Paul Ryan (R., Wis.) proposes a simple postcard for filing typical tax returns. Rather than the current 1040 form’s 79 lines, Ryan’s postcard contains 14. With nearly every deduction and exemption discarded — beside the home-mortgage and charitable write-offs — there simply would be fewer lines to fill.

This should cheer Americans who struggle to machete their way through today’s tax system. The IRS’s Amazon jungle is impenetrable, menacing, and plagued by pitfalls at every turn. Last month in North Dakota, Trump called America’s tax structure “outdated, complex, and extremely burdensome.” He further lamented the “billions of hours wasted on paperwork and on compliance.” He added: “Our tax code is a giant self-inflicted economic wound.”

According to the IRS’s latest estimates, “The average burden for taxpayers filing Form 1040 is about 15 hours and $280.” Meanwhile, “business taxpayers are expected to have an average burden of about 22 hours and $430.” All told, taxpayers spend some 6 billion hours and $195 billion on tax preparation annually. This entire enterprise is governed by the 10,928 page U.S. tax code, whose prose is as dense as tropical hardwood.

Trump’s answer to this mess:

“Under our plan,” he said, “95 percent of Americans will be able to file their tax returns on a single page without having to keep receipts, fill out schedules, or track endless paperwork.”

Trump’s much-welcome simplification initiative faces two immediate speed bumps:

Congressional Republicans from high-tax, left-wing states such as California and New York are squirming to keep the state-and-local-tax deduction. Dumping that loophole, however, will make Sacramento’s and Albany’s high-tax ways sting. And that would encourage such taxpayers to demand lower taxes from their governors, state lawmakers, mayors, and city councils.

This would be good.

“The best estimate is that roughly 95 percent of tax filers would simply choose the standard deduction rather than itemize,” predicts Jason Pye, vice president of legislative affairs with FreedomWorks. He notes that the standard deduction would increase nearly twofold under Trump’s plan. “When you begin looking at some of the deductions that Congress could do away with, like the state-and-local-tax deduction, you’re also looking at ending what is essentially an incentive for states to increase their tax burdens. Really, that deduction is little more than a subsidy for high-tax states like California, Illinois, and New York. It’s time Congress did away with it.”

Even more worrisome than the wagons encircling this exemption, Capitol Hill Republicans reportedly are warming to a fourth tax bracket for the highest-income earners.

This would be bad.

Washington Republicans have an infuriating habit of defeating Democrats at the polls and then impersonating them once in office. A fourth bracket, to ensnare the wealthy, smacks of far-left class warfare. Republicans should leave the rich-bashing to Bernie Sanders, Vermont’s socialist U.S. senator.

Republicans should know — and loudly exclaim — that the top 1 percent of filers made 20.6 percent of all adjusted gross income and paid 39.5 percent of all income-tax revenue in 2014, the latest Tax Foundation data confirm. The top 10 percent earned 47.2 percent of total AGI and generated 71 percent of federal income taxes.

Democrats whine that the wealthy will enjoy the lion’s share of Trump’s tax cuts. This is logical: The wealthy pay the lion’s share of taxes.

Democrats whine that the wealthy will enjoy the lion’s share of Trump’s tax cuts. This is logical: The wealthy pay the lion’s share of taxes. This is no more shocking than a company that pays most of its commissions to those who produce the most sales.

Republicans should encourage Americans to celebrate how this plan cuts their own taxes, not scorn those who will save more, because they pay more. Further, the ensuing, robust growth will lift the fortunes of all Americans — perhaps disproportionately those whose dim prospects will brighten as the economy expands.

Trump’s plan simplifies the tax code, streamlines tax filing, and creates three tax rates, all lower than today’s 39.6 percent top tier. Congressional Republicans should stop their needless self-sabotage, scrap this Leftist fourth rate on the rich, and speed the enactment of President Trump’s giant, beautiful, massive tax cut.

Deroy Murdock is a Manhattan-based Fox News contributor and a contributing editor of National Review Online, and a senior fellow with the London Center for Policy Research.

Most Popular

White House

The Hole in the Impeachment Case

Thought experiment No. 1: Suppose Bob Mueller’s probe actually proves that Donald Trump is under Vladimir Putin’s thumb. Fill in the rest of the blanks with your favorite corruption fantasy: The Kremlin has video of the mogul-turned-president debauching himself in a Moscow hotel; the Kremlin has a bulging ... Read More
White House

The Hole in the Impeachment Case

Thought experiment No. 1: Suppose Bob Mueller’s probe actually proves that Donald Trump is under Vladimir Putin’s thumb. Fill in the rest of the blanks with your favorite corruption fantasy: The Kremlin has video of the mogul-turned-president debauching himself in a Moscow hotel; the Kremlin has a bulging ... Read More
Media

Martha McSally’s Blasphemy

As I note in my New York Post piece today, I don’t believe that Martha McSally, who is serving her first term in the Senate after being appointed to take John McCain’s seat, is going to be helped much by accusing CNN’s Manu Raju of being a “hack.” Attacking the press might be an effective way to excite ... Read More
Media

Martha McSally’s Blasphemy

As I note in my New York Post piece today, I don’t believe that Martha McSally, who is serving her first term in the Senate after being appointed to take John McCain’s seat, is going to be helped much by accusing CNN’s Manu Raju of being a “hack.” Attacking the press might be an effective way to excite ... Read More

People Make New Orleans

I had my first taste of southern hospitality the day I moved to New York. A young woman from New Orleans, whom I had met only briefly over Skype (she had advertised a room in the Bronx, though I preferred a room in Manhattan), had asked if anyone would be picking me up from the airport. No, I told her. I didn’t ... Read More

People Make New Orleans

I had my first taste of southern hospitality the day I moved to New York. A young woman from New Orleans, whom I had met only briefly over Skype (she had advertised a room in the Bronx, though I preferred a room in Manhattan), had asked if anyone would be picking me up from the airport. No, I told her. I didn’t ... Read More
Elections

Lying Liz

Ever since she began explaining how her Medicare for all plan would be funded, and how she would pass it, Elizabeth Warren has been sinking. Ahead of last week’s debate, her camp leaked a story that her friend Bernie Sanders met with her in 2018 to discuss plans for 2020, and that at this meeting, Sanders had ... Read More
Elections

Lying Liz

Ever since she began explaining how her Medicare for all plan would be funded, and how she would pass it, Elizabeth Warren has been sinking. Ahead of last week’s debate, her camp leaked a story that her friend Bernie Sanders met with her in 2018 to discuss plans for 2020, and that at this meeting, Sanders had ... Read More
Elections

Thanks for Nothing, New York Times

Imagine how self-important you’d have to be as an institution to decide that the public so craves your political advice and opinion that you need to air an hour-long program dedicated to sharing your painstaking deliberations over who ought to be the Democratic presidential nominee. Next, imagine you’re so ... Read More
Elections

Thanks for Nothing, New York Times

Imagine how self-important you’d have to be as an institution to decide that the public so craves your political advice and opinion that you need to air an hour-long program dedicated to sharing your painstaking deliberations over who ought to be the Democratic presidential nominee. Next, imagine you’re so ... Read More