Editor’s Note: The following piece originally appeared at Populyst. It is reprinted here with permission.
Venezuela is bankrupt, having just defaulted on three interest payments. And much of the world is pointing fingers at the socialist policies of Hugo Chávez and those of his successor, the incumbent Nicolás Maduro. This laying of the blame is not wrong, but it is incomplete.
The kindest thing you could say about Mr. Chávez is that he was a talented demagogue who brilliantly identified his opportunity and judiciously seized his moment. But, as previously argued by Fred McMahon of the Fraser Institute, Chávez did not start Venezuela’s downward spiral. He was instead one of the final acts in the country’s decades-long devolution from laissez-faire capitalism to cronyism and finally to socialism. Cronies undermined Venezuela’s economy for decades and opened the door to Chávez’s socialism.
McMahon explained last year in the Globe and Mail:
Venezuela, like much of Latin America, was afflicted by crony capitalists, who detest free markets as much as crony socialists, and degraded free markets long before Mr. Chávez.
Cronyism restricted markets, weakened the rule of law, undermined growth, adopted many leftist “populist” policies to maintain power and favoured their supporters at all income levels, excluding others and generating the frustration that led to Mr. Chávez.
In the same vein, I argued previously that cronyism is a bridge from laissez-faire to socialism.
Measured by the Fraser Institute’s Economic Freedom Ranking, Venezuela ranked tenth in the world in 1970, but it had slipped to a ranking of 109th by the time Chávez became president in 1999. Of course, he and his successor made the crony problem even worse, as socialists everywhere have a habit of doing, and Venezuela ranked 159th or dead last of all ranked countries in 2015.
Some of the decline that started in 1970 is explained by Venezuela’s growing oil revenues. The great leap in the price of oil made the economy increasingly extractive and exclusive. Great wealth came more easily to rent-seekers with the right connections in government and business than to those who deserved it by dint of entrepreneurial merit.
There is a warning here for other countries. In 1970, the United States was ranked fourth on the Fraser index. By 2015, it had dropped to eleventh. If this moderate step down is not too worrying at first blush, it may be because cronyism has become a problem in nearly all countries after a prolonged boom in the real-estate, telecom, energy, law, finance and other extractive sectors. If it could be measured in absolute instead of relative terms, the U.S. drop would probably look significantly more pronounced.
President Trump and his entourage speak the language of capitalism, but they arguably constitute the most glaringly cronyistic administration in memory. In theory therefore, we could now be in a transition that opens the door to the presidency of Bernie Sanders or one of his political heirs.