Culture

Call Me by Your Name: Idealized Sex between an Adult Man and a Nubile Teen

Timothée Chalamet and Armie Hammer in Call Me By Your Name (Sony Pictures Classics)
But the lovers are gay and chic, so cue the adulation and awards.

The widely acclaimed Call Me by Your Name dares romanticize a youth-to-adult sexual relationship. It’s dressed-up as both nostalgia — set in 1983 — and Continental sophistication: Seventeen-year-old Elio (Timothée Chalamet) becomes obsessed with Oliver (Armie Hammer), his father’s 24-year-old research assistant who has joined the family’s summer retreat in Italy. But the dreamy, erotic story (languorous, sun-bright idylls, visual fetishes such as overripe fruit and wet swim trunks) has been queered by the film’s belated release, which, after its premiere last winter at the Sundance Festival, is strikingly mistimed.

Now this tale of first love (based on a novel by André Aciman) too closely resembles the taboo of unequal sexual relations currently driving our culture’s moment of neo-Puritanism. What was calculated to appeal to pro-gay social sentiment and rouse intense compassion for a youngster’s coming-out is now exposed as a dishonest, weepy fusion of lechery and virtue-signaling.

Director Luca Guadagnino is a practiced art-movie provocateur and procurer. His previous features I Am Love and A Bigger Splash paraded Eurotrash decadence via flimsy sexual-liberation plots (respectively flirting with adultery and incest, the films starred progressive art icon Tilda Swinton). Call Me by Your Name continues this pimpology by shifting the crude, ’80s teenage getting-laid genre (made popular by Porky’s) to the realm of elitist kitsch. The film’s opening credits fan out photographs of male nude classical Greek statuary beneath fancy script — introducing the slide collection of Elio’s art-professor father (Michael Stuhlbarg), who is married to an Italian aristocrat (Amira Casar). This tony erotica catalogues an undercurrent of upscale licentiousness in which boy is eventually drawn to man.

Elio, a skinny kid with a heart-shaped face, is a piano prodigy who prefers classical music to teenage pop; he begins his seduction of grad student Oliver, who looks like a country club’s tall carefree tennis pro, by competing with him intellectually. It’s a discreet version of pulling a schoolgirl’s pigtails, courtesy of the screenplay by James Ivory, director of the pompous literary adaptations A Room with a View, Maurice, and Howards End. Ivory’s own cache — an old-fashioned refinement of lust — disguises what is, essentially, Guadagnino’s porno-chic. (The film feels like a flashback but isn’t. By making Elio so precocious yet intense, with none of the usual adolescent banality, Guadagnino reveals he is more than a little in love with the memory of being jailbait.)

For conservatives who are susceptible to the blandishments of virtue-signaling in left-wing films, this high-class movie presents a problem: How do socially aware filmgoers reconcile their cultural interests with artistic pretense and social controversy? The film’s very title (a lover’s plea that begs for the rejoinder “ . . . and I’ll call you by mine”) conflates identity politics with innocence. Art-radical Guadagnino favors transgression while traditionalist Ivory sentimentalizes passion. Yet neither filmmaker explores the deep abandonment of ego that Jonathan Demme and Toni Morrison boldly dramatized in Beloved, when a woman says, “Put your finger inside me and call my name.”

Compared with Beloved or any number of films dealing with down-to-earth sexual feelings that go wild — whether Last Tango in Paris, Stealing Beauty, Being 17, or this year’s Paris 05:59: Théo & Hugo Call Me By Your Name is trite.

At this moment of moral and sexual chaos, in which famous men are punished for aggressively acting on their sexual instinct, Call Me by Your Name oddly seems morally evasive.

At this moment of moral and sexual chaos, in which famous men are punished for aggressively acting on their sexual instinct — the same libidinous behavior idealized in countless ads and movies — Call Me by Your Name oddly seems morally evasive. It hedges around reckless behavior. Elio, who shows no interest in boys his age, sexually exploits a young Italian girl while Oliver neglects his heterosexual relations back home. The film plays with the idea of ethnic and class assimilation by pointlessly bringing up Elio’s envy of Oliver’s WASP-appearing Jewishness; then it offers strange, maudlin absolution for the story’s mess of sub rosa compulsions.

A climactic speech by Elio’s father signals approval of the intergenerational tryst: “You two had a nice friendship. You’re too smart not to know how special what you two had was.” This leering endorsement turns into a declaration:

When you least expect it, Nature has cunning ways of finding our weakest spots. . . . You had a beautiful friendship, maybe more than a friendship. . . . We go bankrupt by the age of 30 and have less to offer each time we find someone new.

Few recent films have so bluntly proclaimed moral pessimism. This subtly envious dad recalls the confession of the pedophile father to his own son in Todd Solondz’s Happiness (1998) — but unironically, so that the transgression partly set up by Elio’s enlightened parents is made complete and without guilt.

In the current Lady Bird, Chalamet, in contrast to his oversensitivity in Call Me by Your Name, portrays a pretentious, self-centered teenage lothario who deflowers the heroine and then callously advises, “You’re going to have so much unspecial sex in your life.” This, at least, is a more honest admission of the progressive attitude that critics who praise Call Me By Your Name pretend to shrug off — while shedding tears of self-pity.

Call Me by Your Name ignores credible behavior and indulges in politicized, eroticized fantasy, just like last year’s Moonlight and the previous decade’s Brokeback Mountain. Those movies became cultural totems by promoting attitudes of gay pathos rather than acknowledging the common complexity of sexual relations. When Elio mocks an elderly male couple as “Sonny and Cher,” the father reprimands: “Is it because they’re ridiculous or because they’re gay?” This summarizes Guadagnino’s pop-culture sophistry, a self-congratulatory form of sophistication.

No doubt today’s sexual witch-hunters will justify praising this across-the-age-barrier romance by pointing to the film industry’s sanctimonious efforts to expunge the cultural presence of Kevin Spacey (based on allegations that he sexually assaulted several young men). Call Me by Your Name allows PC persecutors to enjoy the double standard of idealizing adolescent sexual impulse and ignoring it when convenient. It’s a love story for hypocrites.

READ MORE:

Call Me By Your Name: The Next Big Oscar Winner?

Stephen Spielberg’s Triumph and Mistake

White-Trash Cinema

Armond White is the author of New Position: The Prince Chronicles, at Amazon.

 

Most Popular

World

Trump’s Disgraceful Press Conference in Helsinki

On Monday, President Trump gave a deeply disgraceful press conference with Russian dictator Vladimir Putin. The presser began with Trump announcing that although the Russia–U.S. relationship has “never been worse than it is now,” all of that “changed as of about four hours ago.” It was downhill from ... Read More
Culture

Questions for Al Franken

1)Al, as you were posting on social media a list of proposed questions for Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, did it occur to you that your opinion on the matter is no more relevant than Harvey Weinstein’s? 2) Al, is it appropriate for a disgraced former U.S. senator to use the Twitter cognomen “U.S. ... Read More
Elections

Democrats Are Dumping Moderates

The activist base of the Democratic party is lurching left fast enough that everyone should pay attention. Activists matter because their turnout in low-turnout primaries and caucuses almost propelled leftist Bernie Sanders to victory over Hillary Clinton in 2016. Last month, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez unseated New ... Read More
National Security & Defense

Trump’s Helsinki Discord

Donald Trump is not, and never will be, the Moscow correspondent for The Nation magazine, and he shouldn’t sound like it. The left-wing publication is prone to extend sympathetic understanding to adversaries of the United States and find some reason, any reason, to blame ourselves for their external ... Read More