Law & the Courts

What the President Knew and When He Knew It

Michael Flynn at the White House, February 1, 2017. (Carlos Barria/Reuters)
Trump’s attorney muddies the waters, but there’s evidence that Trump didn’t know Flynn had lied to the FBI — and that the FBI didn’t think Flynn had lied.

The president is not being well served by his lawyers.

As I note in my column this morning, there was a Trump tweet on Saturday afternoon asserting that the president knew that then–National Security Adviser Michael Flynn had lied to the FBI when Trump fired Flynn in February. (Flynn, of course, pled guilty on Friday to one count of lying to the FBI.)

I call this a “Trump tweet,” rather than saying, “President Trump tweeted,” because the president evidently did not write the tweet himself.

John Dowd, the president’s personal attorney, acknowledges that he composed the tweet and sent it to Dan Scavino, the White House social-media director, for posting.

 

Here’s the tweet:

At the time Flynn was having the contacts with Russian ambassador Sergei Kislyak that led to the Justice Department’s decision to have the FBI interview Flynn, the acting attorney general was Sally Yates. She was very involved in the investigation and made the decision to inform the Trump White House that the substance of Flynn’s contacts with Kislyak was not being accurately reflected in public statements by Trump-administration officials. Yates later testified before Senator Lindsey Graham’s subcommittee of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

In Yates’s testimony, she pointedly stated that she had declined to tell White House Counsel Don McGahn about how Flynn’s interview had gone. Graham asked, “What did you tell the White House?” In the course of a long response, Yates stated, “We also told the White House Counsel that General Flynn had been interviewed by the FBI on February 24. [ACM note: She misspoke; it was actually January 24.] Mr. McGahn asked me how he did and I declined to give him an answer to that.”

Moreover, as the Wall Street Journal’s editors noted last Friday, contemporaneous reporting in February 2017 indicated that Flynn had cooperated and would not be charged. For example, CNN reported on February 17 that “the FBI interviewers believed Flynn was cooperative and provided truthful answers” during the interview.

The Journal added that a congressional source says that then-Director Comey told the House Intelligence Committee on March 2 that the FBI agents who interviewed Flynn believed he had not intentionally misled them, though Flynn might have forgotten some details. Moreover, in Comey’s written congressional testimony after he was fired by Trump, Comey addressed his meeting with the president on February 14 (i.e., the day after Flynn was fired). The former director stated that he had agreed with the president that Flynn “is a good guy.”

In sum, there is a good deal of evidence for the proposition that Trump did not know Flynn had lied to FBI agents in his January 24 interview. In fact, there is ample reason to believe that the FBI didnt believe Flynn had lied — i.e., that the Mueller investigation drew an aggressive conclusion about the interview that second-guessed the agents who had actually questioned Flynn and had assessed his credibility based on personal, real-time observation (a point made moot by Flynn’s guilty plea, in which he acknowledges lying to the agents).

Knowing all this, it is very difficult to understand Dowd’s tweet.

READ MORE:

What the Flynn Plea Means

No, Michael Flynn Didn’t Violate the Logan Act

Michael Flynn Charge: Monstrous Injustice or Prelude to Bigger Things?

Most Popular

White House

Obama Wrote Trump a $73 Million Check

The New York Times’ big exposé on President Trump's tax returns flags some things that may be dodgy but mainly it just confirms what everybody (including Trump) has always said -- there are a lot of loopholes in the tax code that a savvy operator can exploit. Whose fault is that? The system long predates ... Read More
White House

Obama Wrote Trump a $73 Million Check

The New York Times’ big exposé on President Trump's tax returns flags some things that may be dodgy but mainly it just confirms what everybody (including Trump) has always said -- there are a lot of loopholes in the tax code that a savvy operator can exploit. Whose fault is that? The system long predates ... Read More

BLM Becomes the PLO

I am inclined to think that the Palestinians have some legitimate beefs, historically speaking. I just don’t care very much. You blow up children in pizza shops, and your priorities go right to the bottom of my global humanitarian to-do list. Palestinians want a state? I wouldn’t lend Mahmoud Abbas a cup ... Read More

BLM Becomes the PLO

I am inclined to think that the Palestinians have some legitimate beefs, historically speaking. I just don’t care very much. You blow up children in pizza shops, and your priorities go right to the bottom of my global humanitarian to-do list. Palestinians want a state? I wouldn’t lend Mahmoud Abbas a cup ... Read More
World

Europe Makes Its Choice

The president of the European Council does not usually make news when addressing the UN General Assembly. In fact, the current occupant of the post, Charles Michel might be used to giving UN addresses that attract minimal attention. He is, after all, a former prime minister of Belgium. However, today was ... Read More
World

Europe Makes Its Choice

The president of the European Council does not usually make news when addressing the UN General Assembly. In fact, the current occupant of the post, Charles Michel might be used to giving UN addresses that attract minimal attention. He is, after all, a former prime minister of Belgium. However, today was ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Judge Barrett on the Second Amendment

Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s impressive dissent in Kanter v. Barr (pp. 27-64) illustrates both her fidelity to the Supreme Court’s landmark Second Amendment ruling in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) and her masterful application of the constitutional methodology of originalism. Rickey I. Kanter pleaded ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Judge Barrett on the Second Amendment

Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s impressive dissent in Kanter v. Barr (pp. 27-64) illustrates both her fidelity to the Supreme Court’s landmark Second Amendment ruling in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) and her masterful application of the constitutional methodology of originalism. Rickey I. Kanter pleaded ... Read More
Law & the Courts

On Judge Barrett, Let’s Tell the Truth

Once when I was a kid, my dad held up three fingers and asked, “Does this two look like a three?” Little did I know that this attempted sleight of hand would become a regular feature of the process for appointing federal judges. Watch for it in the days ahead as the Senate considers President Donald Trump’s ... Read More
Law & the Courts

On Judge Barrett, Let’s Tell the Truth

Once when I was a kid, my dad held up three fingers and asked, “Does this two look like a three?” Little did I know that this attempted sleight of hand would become a regular feature of the process for appointing federal judges. Watch for it in the days ahead as the Senate considers President Donald Trump’s ... Read More