Politics & Policy

How Trump Can Build Infrastructure the Right Way

President Trump delivers his State of the Union address, January 30, 2018. (Photo: Shealah Craighead/White House)
Limit federal involvement.

In a stellar performance, President Donald J. Trump was steady and focused in his first State of the Union. Critics who just days ago warned that Trump was too mentally ill to function must feel foolish. The commander in chief was firmly in control Tuesday evening as he addressed leaders in all three branches of government.

Trump offered specific ideas on immigration, national security, and — for terminally ill patients — an urgent “right to try” experimental, possibly life-saving drugs. He also invited Democrats to collaborate with him on multiple issues.

But Trump’s scowling resistance was virtually paralyzed. The Party of No refused to stand and cheer even the fact that black unemployment is at record lows. This reveals just how little liberal Democrats really care about black Americans.

With few exceptions (e.g., “prices will come down” on pharmaceuticals), Trump was Reaganesque: patriotic, optimistic, and respectful of low taxes, free markets, and limited government. He boldly proposed to give every cabinet secretary “the authority to reward good workers — and to remove federal employees who undermine the public trust or fail the American people.” Trump’s signature on the VA Accountability Act empowered Secretary of Veteran Affairs David Shulkin to sack some 1,500 employees who betrayed America’s veterans.

President Trump’s call for $1.5 trillion in infrastructure spending could add a big-government blemish to a record that is far more conservative than his biggest pro-market fans dared imagine. Luckily, several ideas could bolster this effort’s fiscal responsibility and market friendliness as it addresses legitimate public needs.

‐ First, fix things at risk of collapse. The American Road and Transportation Builders Association recently identified 54,259 bridges that literally are turning to crumbs. One bridge across the Potomac couldn’t be more elegant from the outside. Stately lions guard both ends as its marble gleams above the river’s waves. But beneath the surface, the steel beams that hold the entire structure erect are rusted completely through. In several spots, the vehicles that pass overhead practically float on air. Many miles west, a Utah driver barely escaped death when a chunk of concrete cleaved off an overhead span and smashed through his windshield. “Another six to eight inches,” Mike Peterson told NBC News, “you might not be talking to me today.”

‐ Minneapolis’s I-35W Bridge tumbled into the Mississippi River in 2007, killing 13 and wounding 145. Tragedy narrowly was averted in February 2017, when California’s Oroville Dam nearly ruptured, before being patched back together. These clear and present dangers should be eliminated long before Washington even entertains whimsical projects, such as Democratic governor Jerry Brown’s magic train set in California’s San Joaquin Valley.

Wherever possible, federal funds should augment state and private money, via public–private partnerships.

‐ Federal money should be block-granted to the states, provided that each renovates the dozen structures likeliest to implode, injure, or kill people. Federal cash should support state priorities that overlap with the Interstate Highway System and other federal properties.

‐ Wherever possible, federal funds should augment state and private money, via public–private partnerships. Rather than simply sign fat checks, Washington should favor loan guarantees, back stops, and matching funds. As President Trump explained, “every federal dollar should be leveraged by partnering with state and local governments and, where appropriate, tapping into private sector investment to permanently fix the infrastructure deficit.” He also should encourage American companies that repatriate foreign profits to support infrastructure. Why not embolden Apple to adopt a bridge or two?

‐ Washington should speed approvals and encourage states to do likewise. “We built the Empire State Building in just one year,” Trump observed. “Is it not a disgrace that it can now take ten years just to get a permit approved for a simple road?”

Proposals deserve green or red lights within two years, or even one. Science-based environmental reviews should weigh real threats, not hallucinate about rare species that someday might emerge in a habitat from which they have been absent for decades, or longer.

‐ Incentives matter, as former governor Pete Wilson (R., Calif.) proved after the January 1994 Northridge earthquake flattened the Santa Monica Freeway in West L.A. “Each contract included an incentive — if the work was late, we charged a fine, and if it was completed early, we paid a bonus,” Wilson later testified before Congress. Thanks also to accelerated permits and suspended regulations, this thoroughfare reopened 74 days ahead of schedule. Contractor C. C. Myers Inc. collected a $14.5 million bonus for this much-welcome speeding.

‐ Davis-Bacon reform would help. Avoiding union-driven prevailing wages would lower costs and open the labor market to younger workers and — perfect for Trump — apprentices.

These steps would revitalize U.S. infrastructure in a way that would limit federal involvement in what typically is a statist endeavor. “And,” as President Donald J. Trump promised, “we will do it with American heart, American hands, and American grit.”


Trump’s Infrastructure Opportunity

Trump’s Confused Infrastructure Strategy

Infrastructure and Free Markets

Deroy Murdock — Deroy Murdock is a Manhattan-based Fox News contributor and a contributing editor of National Review Online.

Most Popular


NATO’s Challenge Is Germany, Not America

During the recent NATO summit meeting, a rumbustious Donald Trump tore off a thin scab of niceties to reveal a deep and old NATO wound — one that has predated Trump by nearly 30 years and goes back to the end of the Cold War. In an era when the Soviet Union and the Warsaw Pact are now ancient history, ... Read More
White House

The President’s Do-Over

I agree with Jonah on all counts: On net, President Trump’s do-over of his Helsinki remarks is a good thing; regrettably, it is not sincere; and while I hope the revised version is the one he sticks to, I don’t have confidence that will be the case -- as posited in my column Tuesday on the folly of having the ... Read More