National Security & Defense

Pyongyang’s Summit Invitation to Washington: Beware of Playing into Kim’s Hands

(KCNA via Reuters)
The U.S. should be wary of walking into talks that could place it in a bind and tip the scales in North Korea’s favor.

Last night’s headlines about President Trump’s accepting North Korean leader Kim Jong Un’s invitation to a summit — to take place as early as May — were rattling, to say the least. As New York Times writer Peter Baker points out, this decision is a “supremely self-confident” approach on the part of both President Trump and Kim. After a series of North Korean nuclear and missile tests, the atrocious death of North Korea–detained University of Virgina student Otto Warmbier, and Pyongyang’s cyber-hacking exploits, to say that summit diplomacy is premature is a gross understatement. We clearly have lightheartedly skedaddled over a few of the critical stepping stones prerequisite to two heads of such polar-opposite states meeting for the first time. Summit diplomacy requires careful planning and preparation, but it appears this decision was made in the blink of an eye.

There are two key words to keep in mind as we try to grasp the state of play: scale and bind.

An unbalanced, teetering scale captures the inconsistent and tenuous approach taken by the U.S., South Korea, and the international community toward North Korea. Washington has strongly advocated and applied sanctions on the DPRK, even going so far as to consider an all-out military confrontation with Pyongyang. And now we’ve abruptly tipped the scale by agreeing to a sit-down-across-the-table meeting with an adversary who just last month lashed out at the Trump administration for criticizing Pyongyang’s human-rights record on the world stage during the Pyeongchang olympics. Seoul — with the highest stakes in this game — seesaws between a hardline approach and engagement each time the political tides turn with a new presidential administration. Meanwhile, North Korea methodically plans and maps out its long-term game sequence, consistent with its own rules. For Kim, a summit meeting with President Trump will help elevate his status and legitimize North Korea’s identity; Washington’s immediate acceptance of Pyongyang’s invitation only serves to validate this goal.

That we have decided to altogether skip the lower-level talks necessary for a presidential summit also puts the scale off-kilter. Indeed, to accept Kim’s invitation to a meeting without conditions is a break from our history of pursuing a phased, progression-based diplomacy with the stance that if “things work out” well for Washington, perhaps a breakthrough in relations could be achieved. But this on-the-spot agreement to meet Kim lends credibility to the perception that top-level decisions on touchy policy topics are being made hastily. How then does our credibility hold?

Momentous as it may be, the U.S.–DPRK summit actually places Washington in a bind to choose a course of action after meeting with Pyongyang. The clock will start ticking for the U.S. to slide something across the table to North Korea in exchange for or following Pyongyang’s altered behavior. The odds of making a rational, feasible policy choice diminish under such time pressure. I’d venture to say that this will work in the North’s favor — in some loosening of the U.S. or international chokehold on the regime.

In South Korean national-security adviser Chung Eui-yong’s statement to the press at the White House, note that he says only that Kim expresses the will to denuclearize and, moving forward, will refrain from — not absolutely stop — any nuclear or missile tests. If the past is any indication, Pyongyang’s will can change upon little notice. A promise to refrain from doing something may result in temporarily curbed behavior; but once the temporary stay is removed, the built-up pressure often results in greater destruction. In response, our actions should be just as tentative and conditional, lest we find ourselves marching to the North’s tune down the path of concessions.

As the U.S., South Korea, and other stakeholders deliberate over the next steps to take in dealing with North Korea, consider Pyongyang’s motivations for the recent about-face. Consider that Kim sent his pregnant younger sister to Seoul as part of his charm offensive, his eagerness to welcome the South Korean delegation to Pyongyang, and that this recent invitation to President Trump could all be indicators of internal instability and deteriorating conditions in North Korea — in short, these actions could be a reflection of Kim’s desperate state.

With the Trump–Kim summit just two months away, there is much work to be done. But it’s not too late to tip the scales toward a more equitable, measured handling of North Korea, lest we find ourselves in Pyongyang’s stifling bind.

Soo Kim is a former CIA North Korea analyst, focusing on the regime's leadership, nuclear proliferation, and propaganda.

Most Popular


What We’ve Learned about Jussie Smollett

It’s been a few weeks since March 26, when all charges against Jussie Smollett were dropped and the actor declared that his version of events had been proven correct. How’s that going? Smollett’s celebrity defenders have gone quiet. His publicists and lawyers are dodging reporters. The @StandwithJussie ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Lessons of the Mueller Probe

Editor’s Note: The following is the written testimony submitted by Mr. McCarthy in connection with a hearing earlier today before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence on the Mueller Report (specifically, the first volume of the report, which addresses Russia’s interference in the 2016 ... Read More

Kamala Harris Runs for Queen

I’m going to let you in on a secret about the 2020 presidential contest: Unless unforeseen circumstances lead to a true wave election, the legislative stakes will be extremely low. The odds are heavily stacked against Democrats’ retaking the Senate, and that means that even if a Democrat wins the White House, ... Read More

Why Are the Western Middle Classes So Angry?

What is going on with the unending Brexit drama, the aftershocks of Donald Trump’s election, and the “yellow vests” protests in France? What drives the growing estrangement of southern and eastern Europe from the European Union establishment? What fuels the anti-EU themes of recent European elections and ... Read More
Energy & Environment

The Climate Trap for Democrats

The more the climate debate changes, the more it stays the same. Polls show that the public is worried about climate change, but that doesn’t mean that it is any more ready to bear any burden or pay any price to combat it. If President Donald Trump claws his way to victory again in Pennsylvania and the ... Read More
White House

Sarah Sanders to Resign at End of June

Sarah Huckabee Sanders will resign from her position as White House press secretary at the end of the month, President Trump announced on Twitter Thursday afternoon. Sanders, the daughter of former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee, succeeded Sean ... Read More
Politics & Policy

But Why Is Guatemala Hungry?

I really, really don’t want to be on the “Nicolas Kristof Wrote Something Dumb” beat, but, Jiminy Cricket! Kristof has taken a trip to Guatemala, with a young woman from Arizona State University in tow. “My annual win-a-trip journey,” he writes. Reporting from Guatemala, he discovers that many ... Read More