Politics & Policy

Rand Paul Will Oppose New Secretary of State and CIA Director Nominees

Senator Rand Paul and other members of the House Freedom Caucus hold a news conference on Capitol Hill, March 7, 2017. (Eric Thayer/Reuters)

Senator Rand Paul (R., Ky.) says he will oppose President Trump’s new nominees for secretary of state and CIA director.

Trump tapped current CIA director Mike Pompeo for secretary of state after firing Rex Tillerson on Tuesday. Gina Haspel will fill Pompeo’s shoes in Langley if she is confirmed.

But Paul, who’s taken libertarian stands on national-security issues in the past, objected to Haspel’s involvement with and support for enhanced interrogation techniques, or “torture,” as he put it. He has threatened to filibuster both nominations.

Haspel oversaw a CIA “black-ops” site in Thailand from 2003 to 2005 where dozens of suspected terrorists were tortured. In 2005, she destroyed tapes showing terrorist interrogations at the site for which she was present.

“I think the debate over whether or not America is a country in favor of torture or not is an important one,” Paul said, accusing Haspel of “gleeful enjoyment at the suffering of someone being tortured.”

The former presidential candidate said he opposes Pompeo’s support for military involvement in Iran.

“I’m perplexed by the nomination of people who love the Iraq War so much that they would advocate for a war with Iran next,” Paul said, referring to Pompeo. “It goes against most of the things President Trump campaigned on, that the unintended consequences of regime change in Iraq led to instability in the Middle East.”

“I’m going to do everything I can to block them,” he added of the two nominees.

Paul serves on the Foreign Relations Committee, where the GOP has only a one-seat majority. If Democrats join him in opposition, they could obstruct Pompeo’s nomination.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Demagoguery Is Not Leadership

The government of Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern in New Zealand has, with the support of the opposition, decided to enact fundamental changes in the nation’s firearms laws less than a week after the massacre at two Christchurch mosques. This is the opposite of leadership. It is also an example of why ... Read More
White House

The Media’s Disgrace

There will soon enough be an effort to memory-hole it, but the media coverage of the Russia investigation was abysmal and self-discrediting — obsessive and hysterical, often suggesting that the smoking gun was right around the corner, sometimes supporting its hoped-for result with erroneous, too-good-to-check ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Bonfire of the Media Vanities

If the mainstream media had any capacity whatsoever for shame, embarrassment, or even honor, it would be raining anchors outside MSNBC headquarters. Hara-kiri knives would be selling out at Saks Fifth Avenue. Children would have to be advised not to flip on any news broadcast except Fox News Channel lest they ... Read More
Politics & Policy

What Was Trump So Annoyed About?

One of the stranger arguments that I heard throughout the Mueller saga -- and am hearing today, now that it's turned out to be a dud -- is that Donald Trump's irritation with the process was unreasonable and counterproductive. This tweet, from CNN's Chris Cilizza, is a nice illustration of the genre: Donald ... Read More
White House

Our Long National Hysteria 

Our long national hysteria may not be over, but at least it should — by rights — be diminished. Robert Mueller delivered his long-awaited report on Friday, and Attorney General William Barr just released his summary of the findings. They completely vindicate President Trump regarding the allegation that ... Read More