Economy & Business

Make the Tax Cuts Permanent

Speaker of the House Paul Ryan speaks at news conference announcing the passage of the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act” at the Capitol in Washington, November 16, 2017. (Aaron P. Bernstein/Reuters)

Tax reform was passed under reconciliation, which made it a flawed success. To ensure compliance with the Byrd Rule — which prohibits reconciliation bills from increasing the budget deficit past a ten-year window — Republicans made the corporate tax cut permanent but the individual tax cuts temporary. The doubling of the standard deduction, the expansion of the child tax credit, and the lower individual-rate structure all expire after 2025. Since uncertainty about the future discourages businesses from making long-term investments, it is important to have a stable corporate tax rate. But it is neither good policy nor good politics to pass a bill that, absent further congressional action, means Americans’ taxes will rise after eight years. Republicans should bring legislation to the floor that would make the individual tax cuts permanent.

Any such bill would need support from Democratic senators to pass, and ideally would preserve the provisions mentioned above, the benefits of which redound to middle-income earners. If it passes, the GOP will have shepherded through permanent tax relief for most Americans. If it doesn’t, Republicans will have forced Democrats to vote down middle-class tax cuts. We would obviously prefer to see the former, but Republicans staring at the prospect of a bloodbath in the midterms should be happy with either outcome.

When tax reform was being debated, Democrats feigned outrage over the sunset provision for the individual tax cuts. Republicans were actually hiking taxes on middle-class Americans, they said, proving that the GOP cares more about saving money for corporations than helping individuals. If that charge cynically elided the particulars of the reconciliation process, it was also politically potent. The best way to turn the charge on its head is for Republicans to call the Democrats’ bluff and dare them to vote against the permanent tax relief they advocated just months ago.

House speaker Paul Ryan and Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell have already floated the idea, and several legislators are reportedly on board. But some Republicans oppose the idea on the grounds that it will inflate our already ballooning national debt. Supporters of the measure should not respond by insisting that the new tax cut will unleash enough growth to pay for itself. No serious economist believes that. Extending all of the individual-side provisions would, indeed, add hundreds of billions of dollars to the debt. Allowing certain provisions — the scaling down of the alternative minimum tax, the pass-through business deduction — to expire would bring the number down, but not by much.

Yet the cost would be meager compared with the growth of entitlement spending, which is the primary reason our budget is out of balance. Any deal to restore that balance should rest less on tax hikes and more on entitlement reform. Making the tax cuts permanent would improve the chance that when the budget is eventually brought under control, this happens on terms favorable to conservatives. Regardless, no tax relief will hold if entitlement spending continues apace.

The Editors — The Editors comprise the senior editorial staff of the National Review magazine and website.

Most Popular

Culture

Jonathan Swift in a White Suit

In 1965 Tom Wolfe visited Princeton University for a panel discussion of "the style of the Sixties." The author of The Kandy-Kolored Tangerine-Flake Streamline Baby, published that year, was scheduled to appear alongside Günter Grass, Allen Ginsberg, and Paul Krassner. Grass spoke first. The German novelist's ... Read More
World

In Appreciation, and against (Too Much) Nostalgia

To put it a little self-pityingly: It seems that my gurus are going, and the world’s. Richard Pipes, the great historian of Russia and the Soviet Union, died on Thursday; Bernard Lewis, the great historian of the Middle East, died yesterday. We had them both for a long time. Pipes was born in 1923, Lewis way ... Read More
Law & the Courts

This Day in Liberal Judicial Activism—May 20

1996—What’s one way to deal with unhelpful precedent? Just ignore it entirely, as Justice Kennedy’s majority opinion in Romer v. Evans does. In 1986 the Supreme Court ruled in Bowers v. Hardwick that it is constitutionally permissible for states to make homosexual conduct criminal. A decade later, the Court ... Read More
Culture

Comedians Are Catching On

The comedians are beginning to catch on. Over the weekend -- just one week after featuring a bevy of top-line Hollywood stars impersonating members of the Trump administration, as well as a cameo by a vengeful Stormy Daniels asking for President Trump’s resignation -- Saturday Night Live finally acknowledged ... Read More
PC Culture

The Nature of Progressive Insensitivity

Former vice president Joe Biden is back in the news yet again. For a second time, he seems surprised that poor residents of the inner city are capable of doing sophisticated jobs: We don't think ordinary people can do things like program, code. It's not rocket science, guys. So, we went and we hired some folks ... Read More
Culture

The Feminization of Everything Fails Our Boys

Let me share with you two troubling — and, I believe, closely linked — news reports. The first, from this weekend, comes courtesy of the American Enterprise Institute’s Mark Perry. In one chart, he highlights the dramatic and growing gender gap in higher education. In short, women are dominating: ... Read More