Economy & Business

Make the Tax Cuts Permanent

Speaker of the House Paul Ryan speaks at news conference announcing the passage of the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act” at the Capitol in Washington, November 16, 2017. (Aaron P. Bernstein/Reuters)

Tax reform was passed under reconciliation, which made it a flawed success. To ensure compliance with the Byrd Rule — which prohibits reconciliation bills from increasing the budget deficit past a ten-year window — Republicans made the corporate tax cut permanent but the individual tax cuts temporary. The doubling of the standard deduction, the expansion of the child tax credit, and the lower individual-rate structure all expire after 2025. Since uncertainty about the future discourages businesses from making long-term investments, it is important to have a stable corporate tax rate. But it is neither good policy nor good politics to pass a bill that, absent further congressional action, means Americans’ taxes will rise after eight years. Republicans should bring legislation to the floor that would make the individual tax cuts permanent.

Any such bill would need support from Democratic senators to pass, and ideally would preserve the provisions mentioned above, the benefits of which redound to middle-income earners. If it passes, the GOP will have shepherded through permanent tax relief for most Americans. If it doesn’t, Republicans will have forced Democrats to vote down middle-class tax cuts. We would obviously prefer to see the former, but Republicans staring at the prospect of a bloodbath in the midterms should be happy with either outcome.

When tax reform was being debated, Democrats feigned outrage over the sunset provision for the individual tax cuts. Republicans were actually hiking taxes on middle-class Americans, they said, proving that the GOP cares more about saving money for corporations than helping individuals. If that charge cynically elided the particulars of the reconciliation process, it was also politically potent. The best way to turn the charge on its head is for Republicans to call the Democrats’ bluff and dare them to vote against the permanent tax relief they advocated just months ago.

House speaker Paul Ryan and Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell have already floated the idea, and several legislators are reportedly on board. But some Republicans oppose the idea on the grounds that it will inflate our already ballooning national debt. Supporters of the measure should not respond by insisting that the new tax cut will unleash enough growth to pay for itself. No serious economist believes that. Extending all of the individual-side provisions would, indeed, add hundreds of billions of dollars to the debt. Allowing certain provisions — the scaling down of the alternative minimum tax, the pass-through business deduction — to expire would bring the number down, but not by much.

Yet the cost would be meager compared with the growth of entitlement spending, which is the primary reason our budget is out of balance. Any deal to restore that balance should rest less on tax hikes and more on entitlement reform. Making the tax cuts permanent would improve the chance that when the budget is eventually brought under control, this happens on terms favorable to conservatives. Regardless, no tax relief will hold if entitlement spending continues apace.

The Editors — The Editors comprise the senior editorial staff of the National Review magazine and website.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Basta La Vista, Baby

Dear Reader (And especially Martha McSally’s dog), As I often note, I increasingly tend to see the political scene as a scripted reality show in which the writers don’t flesh out the dialogue so much as move characters into weird, wacky, confrontational, or embarrassing positions. It’s a lot like The ... Read More
Education

Betsy DeVos Strikes a Blow for the Constitution

The Department of Education has issued its long-awaited proposed regulations reforming sexual-assault adjudications on college campus. Not only will these rules restore basic due process and fairness to college tribunals, but they also — given how basic the changes are — highlight just how ridiculous ... Read More
Politics & Policy

ABC News Makes a Serious Mistake

Today, across Twitter, I began to see a number of people condemning the Trump administration (and Betsy DeVos, specifically) for imposing a new definition of sexual assault on campus so strict that it would force women to prove that they were so harassed that they'd been chased off campus and couldn't return. ... Read More