National Security & Defense

Israel Shows America How to Deal with Iran

An Israeli soldier gestures near mobile artillery units in the Golan Heights, Israel May 9, 2018. (Amir Cohen/Reuters)
The Jewish state doesn’t take attacks on its citizens lying down. Why should the U.S.?

One of the great and enduring mysteries of American foreign policy is the ongoing, bipartisan tolerance for Iranian efforts to kill Americans by the hundreds. Iran has been waging an undeclared war against the United States since the Hostage Crisis of 1979–1981. Its hostile acts against the United States are almost too numerous to list, but the lowlights include the Beirut Marine barracks bombing, the Khobar Towers bombing, a successful Quds Force plot to kidnap and kill American soldiers in Iraq, and the hundreds of American deaths and injuries due to Iranian-designed and -supplied explosively formed penetrators, the most deadly form of IED in Iraq.

Yet time and again the American response has been muted at best and downright meek at worst, as in the case of the Obama administration’s dreadful Iran deal, when the world’s most powerful nation went hat-in-hand to the jihadist enemy that was killing its soldiers and actually empowered that enemy’s violent expansionism.

Iran has surged its forces throughout the Middle East. Iranian-backed militias threaten American allies in Iraq. Hezbollah, the Iranian Quds Force, and the Iranian Revolutionary Guards have helped preserve the Assad regime and tip the balance in the Syrian civil war. Yemen is a killing field. And now, capitalizing on battlefield gains in Syria, Iran has worked to threaten Israel directly, building a military infrastructure that allows its forces to strike immediately across the border.

America should not fear Iran. For too long, we’ve allowed a paper tiger to kill our citizens. Israel has no such patience. We can learn from its example.

But Israel is not the United States. It has far less patience with threats to the lives of its citizens, and the Trump administration’s support allows it greater freedom of action to meet such threats vigorously.

Witness what happened last night: Iran attacked Israel, and Israel responded with devastating force. Utilizing its military assets close to the Israeli border, Iranian forces launched 20 rockets at Israeli positions in the Golan Heights. The Israelis claimed that the attacks were ineffective; the rockets either were intercepted or fell short of the border. Rather than respond tit-for-tat, the Israelis escalated, launching comprehensive attacks against Iranian positions in Syria. In the words of Israel’s defense minister, Avigdor Lieberman, “If there is rain on our side, there will be a flood on their side.”

This latest exchange of fire comes on the heels of an escalating “shadow war” in Syria, where Israelis have launched a series of strikes designed to slow down the Iranian military build-up. Israel is keenly aware of the Iranian threat and keenly aware of its own vulnerability. Under no circumstances should the world’s only Jewish state find itself in South Korea’s predicament, vulnerable to a ruinous conventional assault from entities that don’t grant or acknowledge its right to exist.

In its article on the strikes, the New York Times included this incredible paragraph:

The response — which Israeli officials claimed struck a severe blow to Iran’s military capacity in the area — came amid drastically ramped up tensions in the Middle East after President Trump’s move this week to pull the United States from a multinational nuclear deal with Tehran. Israel had railed against the agreement, and Mr. Trump had campaigned on the promise of withdrawing from it, but European countries and many analysts had seen it as a crucial element holding Iran and Israel, implacable foes, from all-out conflict.

While there is no doubt tensions are escalating, the Iran deal wasn’t preventing conflict with Israel; it was helping bring war right to Israel’s doorstep. In essence, the deal protected Iran from direct strikes on its homeland even as it poured resources into its Syrian military infrastructure. For Iran, the deal was a shield and a sword, granting a degree of immunity at home while empowering the Iranian military abroad.

America should learn lessons from Israel. It needs to shed its inexplicable fear of direct confrontation and signal that ongoing Iranian efforts to kill American troops and support American enemies are intolerable. It needs to signal clearly that it won’t cede one inch of ground to Iranian-allied forces in Syria. And, as I wrote yesterday, it needs to make clear that any new effort to “race” toward a nuclear bomb will be met with a decisive American response.

Thanks to the Trump administration and the Israeli government, the Iranian regime is more vulnerable now than it’s been in years. Many of its military assets in Syria are a smoking ruin. It has lost the diplomatic shield that allowed it to press its battlefield advantage in Syria and even Iraq. For the first time in more than a decade, Iran is clearly on the defensive, and, as Eli Lake observed in a piece earlier today, “If history is any guide, the Iranian regime won’t push too far if its leaders believe Trump’s threats are credible.”

Conversely, Lake pointed out, “When the Iranian regime feels secure, it gets more aggressive.” The Iranians have felt secure for far too long. Thanks to the Trump administration’s diplomatic efforts and Israel’s military strikes, this dynamic is changing. Now is the time to press the advantage. America should not fear Iran. For too long, we’ve allowed a paper tiger to kill our citizens. Israel has no such patience. We can learn from its example.

NOW WATCH: ‘Israel: Syria Fires Over 20 Rockets at Israeli Targets’

David French — David French is a senior writer for National Review, a senior fellow at the National Review Institute, and a veteran of Operation Iraqi Freedom.

Most Popular

PC Culture

Hate-Crime Hoaxes Reflect America’s Sickness

On January 29, tabloid news site TMZ broke the shocking story that Jussie Smollett, a gay black entertainer and progressive activist, had been viciously attacked in Chicago. Two racist white men had fractured his rib, poured bleach on him, and tied a noose around his neck. As they were leaving, they shouted ... Read More
U.S.

White Progressives Are Polarizing America

To understand how far left (and how quickly) the Democratic party has moved, let’s cycle back a very short 20 years. If 1998 Bill Clinton ran in the Democratic primary today, he’d be instantaneously labeled a far-right bigot. His support for the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the Defense of Marriage Act, ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Strange Paradoxes of Our Age

Modern prophets often say one thing and do another. Worse, they often advocate in the abstract as a way of justifying their doing the opposite in the concrete. The result is that contemporary culture abounds with the inexplicable — mostly because modern progressivism makes all sorts of race, class, and ... Read More
PC Culture

Fake Newspeople

This week, the story of the Jussie Smollett hoax gripped the national media. The story, for those who missed it, went something like this: The Empire actor, who is both black and gay, stated that on a freezing January night in Chicago, in the middle of the polar vortex, he went to a local Subway store to buy a ... Read More
Elections

One Last Grift for Bernie Sanders

Bernie Sanders, the antique Brooklyn socialist who represents Vermont in the Senate, is not quite ready to retire to his lakeside dacha and so once again is running for the presidential nomination of a party to which he does not belong with an agenda about which he cannot be quite entirely ... Read More
Film & TV

A Sublime Christian Masterpiece of a Film

‘There are two ways through life -- the way of nature and the way of grace,” remarks the saintly mother at the outset of The Tree of Life, one of the most awe-inspiring films of the 21st century. She continues: Grace doesn’t try please itself. It accepts being slighted, forgotten, disliked, accepts insults ... Read More
PC Culture

Changing Reality with Words

The reinvention of vocabulary can often be more effective than any social protest movement. Malarial swamps can become healthy “wetlands.” Fetid “dumps” are often rebranded as green “landfills.” Global warming was once a worry about too much heat. It implied that man-made carbon emissions had so ... Read More