Natural Law

‘Sex Matters’: Mona Charen on the Pursuit of True Love and Happiness

(K Best Photography)
The book’s dedication, a verse from the Song of Songs, establishes the theme at the outset: true love.

Mona Charen had me at the dedication of her latest book. It’s to her husband, and it’s from the Song of Solomon: “I am my beloved’s, and my beloved is mine.”

Also known as the Song of Songs, or the Canticle of Canticles, in both Jewish and Christian traditions, this book is a window into the love God has for His people. We’re created. There’s some purpose. Maybe even a plan. And there is meant to be some joy.

And so, in general, “being at peace with nature,” as Charen recently put it to me, helps. That, in almost a hashtag, is the message of Charen’s new book, Sex Matters: How Modern Feminism Lost Touch with Science, Love, and Common Sense. It is far from being red meat about how wrong the feminist Left is; Charen writes as a loving Jewish mother who knows happiness and wants others to, also. Charen is a nationally syndicated columnist and bestselling author, whom I first got to know in the pages of National Review and then through her appearances on CNN’s Capital Gang Sunday. She also chose to lean out of her career to put her family first. Because that matters. Love is love, but it’s duty and responsibility, too, and also a source of great joy and sorrow, of course. It’s the stuff of life.

“Our culture has misled young men and women about some of the most important ingredients for human happiness and thriving,” Charen writes. “Getting the basics of life right is not difficult, though it does require discarding some pervasive myths. The most consequential is that men and women are completely alike except for obvious anatomical differences. This is false, and imagining it to be true leads to trouble, as all deceit does.”

She continues:

We’ve convinced an entire generation, at least those with lower levels of education, that marriage is optional for parents. Among high school graduates and those with only some college, marriage is rapidly becoming the exception, rather than the rule. Yet highly educated people, who would never consider having children without marrying first, shrink from recommending to others that the altar should precede the nursery.

Feminists often speak in terms of power. Everything that is desirable is said to be “empowering.” Women are encouraged to seize power everywhere from the classroom to the boardroom, and women have been responding. They are outperforming men in school and in many workplaces. Women now hold a majority of managerial positions in the workforce.

She writes with a particular sensitivity to broken hearts: “Yet another kind of power that women heedlessly tossed aside forty years ago was sexual power. The results of that forfeiture are rarely acknowledged. Among the well-educated elites, women must search for love and commitment among a population of young men who have ready access to sex and less incentive than in previous decades to choose monogamy.”

For some, they really never have much of a chance: “Among the less well educated, after several decades of family decline, young men often come from single-parent homes. This makes them less likely to secure educations and good jobs, and that, in turn, makes them less attractive as husbands. Nor do they grow up with role models of responsible fatherhood.”

She says all this while not being judgmental — possibly the only conventionally agreed upon sin of our time. Man and woman and love and marriage and baby carriage may not be for everyone, but it is a leading — and natural and needed — script for life and civilization. And perhaps there’s no time like the Me Too moment to catch people’s attention:

The sexual revolution and the sex-drenched media of our time have given rise to a sense of entitlement on the part of some men. The drunken hookup culture seems to have been designed to the benefit of jerks, selfish creeps, and rapists. It has also confused and misled ordinary young men about what sex is and how women tend to feel, leading to misunderstandings that can turn tragic. The sexual revolution has long since spun off the table and degraded men and women alike. “No strings attached” sexuality is debased and unnatural, especially for women — which, I submit, is why drinking to the point of blacking out has become so common among women.

Both women and men “deserve better,” Charen insists. She wants a counterrevolution of love and tenderness. I can’t help but notice that this is exactly what Pope Francis, who is known for his devotion to the wisdom modeled by another Jewish woman. Transparency about what works frees the human soul for the self-giving we are made for. That helps everyone. It is recourse worth promoting, trying, supporting. Even celebrated.

Sex Matters is refreshment in the heat of anger, misery, and desperation about individual prospects in a challenging political environment. It’s a love letter, and a critical one, that gets to the heart of a word most knotted up in all of that darkness: “identity.” You were made for more than you’re often told, and happiness is possible. You may even find, as the aforementioned Song proclaims, that “deep waters cannot quench love, nor rivers sweep it away.”

This column is based on one available through Andrews McMeel Universal’s Newspaper Enterprise Association.

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Where Is the Flynn 302?

Better late than never (I hope), my weekend column has posted on the website. It deals with the question whether General Michael Flynn actually lied to the FBI agents — including the now infamous Peter Strzok — when they interviewed him in the White House on his third day on the job as national security ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Did Flynn Lie?

At the outset, let’s get two things straight: First, there is something deeply disturbing about the Obama administration’s decision to open a counterintelligence investigation on retired lieutenant general Michael Flynn while he was working on the Trump campaign — and, ultimately, about the Justice ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Who’s in Charge Here?

In the run-up to the 2016 presidential election, Donald Trump was asked on many occasions whether he would “accept the results” of the election if he were to lose. Democrats and their media allies demanded that he make a solemn vow to “accept the results.” It was never entirely clear what anybody thought ... Read More