Immigration

Immigrants Should Support Themselves

(Pixabay)

Federal law states that “any alien who, in the opinion of the consular officer at the time of application for a visa, or in the opinion of the Attorney General at the time of application for admission or adjustment of status, is likely at any time to become a public charge is inadmissible.” The law stipulates that officials must “at a minimum” consider certain factors such as age, health, and education, but otherwise does not limit the executive branch’s discretion in enforcing this provision.

We wish Congress would not write laws this way. Especially with a matter as consequential as this, the legislature should lay out explicit standards for the executive branch to follow, rather than announcing a broad goal and telling the executive to achieve it however it likes.

But this is the rule on the books, and the goal it announces — to deny visas and green cards to those likely to become dependent on our safety net — is a good one. Special cases such as refugees aside, there is no reason whatsoever for the U.S. to welcome immigrants who cannot support themselves without taxpayer subsidies. Current policy does a horrible job of implementing this principle, and therefore we endorse the Trump administration’s new effort to tighten the policy up. On Saturday, the administration released the text of a rule it will propose formally in the coming weeks.

In determining whether someone in the country is “likely at any time to become a public charge,” an obvious factor to consider is the degree to which they are already dependent on the government. And under the current rule, established by executive fiat about two decades ago, officials do consider whether an applicant is primarily dependent on cash assistance.

The problem is that cash assistance is today but a small part of the welfare state. Other forms of aid, from food stamps to housing to Medicaid, are far more common. The administration estimates that 23 percent of foreign-born noncitizens receive public benefits — but that only 2 percent receive cash assistance in particular.

Trump proposes to broaden the scope of the rule to include many of the other benefits available, and to take benefit use into account even if it doesn’t amount to being “primarily dependent” on the government. The new threshold is benefits amounting to 15 percent of the federal poverty guideline for a household of one in a twelve-month period — $1,821 this year — with separate rules for non-monetizable benefits. Benefit receipt would not be disqualifying in itself, though it would be weighted heavily. Far more applicants would be turned down or required to post bonds that protect the government against losses.

One can, of course, argue the particulars of Trump’s plan, which has already been narrowed substantially relative to previous leaked drafts. For one thing, it should apply only to future immigrants, not to those who arrived before the rule was in effect. (The draft rule is limited, though, to benefits received after the rule was in effect.) We urge the Trump administration to consider such details carefully before finalizing the rule — though we must again emphasize that Trump and company wouldn’t be drawing these lines at all if Congress had done its job.

The central thrust of this rule, however, is entirely correct. Our laws say that immigrants are ineligible for visas and green cards if they are likely to become dependent on the safety net funded by U.S. taxpayers. It’s time to start enforcing that policy.

The Editors comprise the senior editorial staff of the National Review magazine and website.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Hillary Ruins the Plan

Editor’s note: Andrew C. McCarthy’s new book is Ball of Collusion: The Plot to Rig an Election and Destroy a Presidency. This is the first in a series of excerpts.  There really was a collusion plot. It really did target our election system. It absolutely sought to usurp our capacity for ... Read More
Religion

Another Pop-Culture Christian Loses His Faith

It’s happened again. For the second time in three weeks, a prominent (at least in Evangelical circles) Christian has renounced his faith. In July, it was Josh Harris, a pastor and author of the mega-best-selling purity-culture book I Kissed Dating Goodbye. This month, it’s Hillsong United songwriter and ... Read More
Culture

Max Boot’s Dishonesty

Before yesterday, my primary criticism of the Washington Post’s Max Boot was political in nature. As I wrote in a recent book review, I found it regrettable that Boot’s opposition to the president had not prevented him from “succumbing reactively to Trump’s cult of personality, or from making Trump the ... Read More
Elections

A Brief History of Election Meddling

Editor’s note: Andrew C. McCarthy’s new book is Ball of Collusion: The Plot to Rig an Election and Destroy a Presidency. This is the second in a series of excerpts. ‘The 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back.” Thus spoke President Barack Obama just a couple of weeks before ... Read More
World

The End of Hong Kong as We Know It

The protests in Hong Kong have been going on for more than four months now, and no matter how the current crisis concludes in the coming days or weeks, it will mark the end of Hong Kong as we know it. The protests started in response to an extradition bill that was proposed by the city’s Beijing-backed ... Read More