Economy & Business

Senator Booker’s Terrible Tax Proposal

Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ) speaks as members of the Senate Judiciary Committee meet to vote on the nomination of judge Brett Kavanaugh to be a Supreme Court associate justice on Capitol Hill in Washington, September 28, 2018. (Jim Bourg/REUTERS)

Senator Cory Booker (D., N.J.) has a problem: a reputation for moderation that may hinder his chances in the Democratic presidential primaries. He is making frantic efforts to explode that old reputation. One day he rails against Jeff Sessions, with whom he used to co-sponsor legislation, as an enemy of civil rights. Another he insists, contrary to evidence, that he is breaking Senate rules to fight Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation.

And now he’s proposing a sweeping program of wealth redistribution, one that would raise estate taxes to their highest level in decades in order to put the money in accounts for children from households that make up to five times the poverty level. (The higher the household income, the lower the yearly deposit.) Booker is touting this idea as a way of boosting saving — but on a national level, it can only reduce saving, since it diminishes the incentive to save.

If you’re rich, the estate tax is a reason to invest in economically unproductive estate planning or to spend the money rather than hand it on. Booker’s 65 percent rate — a significantly higher rate, by the way, than any advanced country levies — would be a much stronger reason to do either than today’s 40 percent rate. (The effective rate would be even higher than 65 percent because of other changes Booker proposes.) Because that rate would apply only to the very largest estates — for married couples, it would kick in at $100 million — it would affect the behavior of a small slice of the population, it is true; but it is the slice that does a disproportionate amount of the country’s saving. A lower rate of national saving will in the long run mean a smaller economy, with lower wages, than we would otherwise have had.

The estate tax is also widely disliked, much to the dismay of progressives. A 2017 poll found that 65 percent of the public wants to abolish the estate tax — and 76 percent wants to abolish it if it’s labeled the “death tax.” But then Booker isn’t playing to most Americans right now, just to left-wingers who hold disproportionate sway in the Democratic party. If only there were a way to redistribute their political influence.

The Editors — The Editors comprise the senior editorial staff of the National Review magazine and website.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Did Flynn Lie?

At the outset, let’s get two things straight: First, there is something deeply disturbing about the Obama administration’s decision to open a counterintelligence investigation on retired lieutenant general Michael Flynn while he was working on the Trump campaign — and, ultimately, about the Justice ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Where Is the Flynn 302?

Better late than never (I hope), my weekend column has posted on the website. It deals with the question whether General Michael Flynn actually lied to the FBI agents — including the now infamous Peter Strzok — when they interviewed him in the White House on his third day on the job as national security ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Who’s in Charge Here?

In the run-up to the 2016 presidential election, Donald Trump was asked on many occasions whether he would “accept the results” of the election if he were to lose. Democrats and their media allies demanded that he make a solemn vow to “accept the results.” It was never entirely clear what anybody thought ... Read More