Politics & Policy

It’s Time to Calm Down about the Caravan

Migrants, traveling with a caravan of thousands from Central America en route to the United States, walk along the highway to Juchitan from Santiago Niltepec, Mexico, October 30, 2018. (Ueslei Marcelino/REUTERS)
We can protect American borders by telling the truth and applying the law.

If you believe that America is and should remain a nation of laws and borders — and if you understand the logistical and physical challenges of walking 1,000 miles through Mexico — there is a relatively simple, firm way to respond to migrant caravans.

To the migrants, the message is simple. The United States will secure its border and enforce its immigration laws. In accordance with those laws, it will summarily deport illegal entrants and interpret its asylum statutes in accordance with their meaning and purpose. If you do complete the journey, you will not be released into the American interior but instead held at the border. Rather than risk a fruitless journey, it is better to turn back now.

To Americans, the message is equally clear. There is no cause for alarm. To the extent that members of the migrant caravan do complete their trek through Mexico, they will not be permitted to storm border crossings, and we have sufficient resources to secure our border and enforce our laws. We will apply those laws fairly and treat migrants humanely, but we will apply the law.

In other words, we can handle this. The migrant caravan is not an emergency. In fact, unless and until it gets hundreds of miles closer (while still retaining its size), there’s not even all that much cause for concern. Even if it arrives in some strength, there is no way for a group that size to sneak across the border, and the most powerful nation in the world has more than enough resources to meet the migrants when they attempt to cross, detain them, and begin the necessary legal proceedings.

It would be a challenge, but (again) not an emergency. And as the caravan marches north — shedding people along the way — the president (and his allies) should be able to make a calm, compelling argument for national borders and the rule of law.

Or they could publicly panic.

Honestly, it’s hard to think of a response less measured and more effective at undermining moderate support for immigration restrictions than the reaction of the president and key allies. The president’s tweets have conveyed extraordinary alarm. Here are some selected entries:

Then, just yesterday alone, on Fox News and Fox Business, guests raised truly absurd claims about the diseases the migrants might bring to the U.S., including leprosy, a polio-like disease, and smallpox. In case you were wondering, smallpox has been eradicated for decades, and the last known smallpox death was in 1978.

And now the Pentagon is planning to send thousands of troops to the border, a military buildup that may soon match or even exceed American deployments to Iraq.

Moreover, it may well be an extraordinary waste of resources. Trump is creating the impression that the Army will protect America’s borders, but it doesn’t have the legal authority to enforce American law. The Posse Comitatus Act prohibits the use of the military in a law-enforcement role. Consequently, the troops will act not — as Trump describes in his tweet — as a military force responding to “invaders” but instead as mere logistical support for conventional federal law enforcement.

As a result of this rhetoric and the dramatic military deployment, we have Americans who are convinced that our border crossings are about to stormed by “invaders” who carry disease and harbor criminals (and possibly terrorists). Conversely, we have another set of Americans who are now more able to caricature the restrictionist position on immigration as driven by hysterical fear — and not just by referring to random right-wing firebrands but by quoting the president of United States and multiple guests on his adored television network.

Moreover, the president’s words actually fuel the caravan and empower left-wing immigration activists. Absent his unrelenting attention, would the caravan be swarming with reporters? Absent his unrelenting attention, would it be drawing the eyes of the world?

Yet that’s when the president’s defenders argue that he’s crazy like a fox. He’s baited the Left, you see, into staking out an extreme position on immigration and on backing potential border chaos that moderate Americans would reject. And they have a point. It is true that the laws of negative polarization are working their magic. Extreme rhetoric is all too often countered by extreme rhetoric on the other side. Witness former Republican strategist Steve Schmidt liken the caravan to the “Reichstag fire” (to which MSNBC’s Chris Hayes immediately replies, “Yeah.”).

That’s a vile assertion. But to exult in triggering extremism is to exult in further polarization, and triggering extremism is much less amusing if the opposing extremist wins an election. In the days before a key midterm, Trump is gambling on panic. That’s not a good look for a president. It’s not good for the country. And it’s terrible for the state of the American immigration debate. The president may never calm down, but his supporters (and members of his administration) can and should.

We can protect American borders by telling the truth and applying the law. It’s an approach that will work in the short term, and it’s an approach that will win in the long term. It’s time we gave it a try.

David French — David French is a senior writer for National Review, a senior fellow at the National Review Institute, and a veteran of Operation Iraqi Freedom.

Most Popular

U.S.

The Inquisitor Has No Clothes

This is a column about impeachment, but first, a confession: I think I might be guilty of insider trading. At this point, I would like to assure my dear friends at the SEC that I do not mean this in any actionable legal sense, but only in principle. Some time ago, I was considering making an investment in a ... Read More