Law & the Courts

Women Must Stand Up for Kavanaugh

Demonstrators protest against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh in front of the office of Sen. Susan Collins on Capitol Hill, September 24, 2018. (Joshua Roberts/Reuters)
There are true victims, and there are false accusations. That’s why we have due process.

Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation process has been turned into a referendum on the #MeToo movement. Regardless of proof, evidence, or truth, the message from the progressive Left is clear: If you support Judge Kavanaugh’s confirmation, you are affirming toxic masculinity and turning a cold shoulder to every legitimate victim of sexual assault. To the Left, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford has already been canonized into an icon of modern feminism.

To “fact-find” at Thursday’s hearing was merely the pretext for a parade of congratulations and praise for the newest face of #MeToo-era feminism. No Democrat even pretended to be open-minded. Senator Dianne Feinstein, who gave a long speech about the importance of abortion in the initial confirmation hearings, even had actress Alyssa Milano present as her guest. (Milano is credited with beginning the hashtag #MeToo and is another bastion of liberal feminism.)

So, the court of public opinion quickly set up a false dilemma. To support Judge Kavanaugh is to delegitimize every female victim’s experience with sexual assault. The Left’s new motto, “I believe women,” is a categorical denial of the fact that people can be sincerely wrong. I could believe with 100 percent certainty something provably false. I could claim I’m the queen of England. I’m a woman, so I have a right to be believed! But what happens when belief does not match fact or reality? What happens when society punishes you based on my unproven belief?

Many who have condemned Kavanaugh show they can no longer reason or use analytical skills to differentiate between fact and reality versus emotion and opinion. All objectivity has been summarily dismissed. All interest in truth has been scorned in favor of political agenda. When our culture drives the idea that we can arbitrate our own reality (often referred to as “your truth”) and simply ignore facts when we don’t prefer them, it shouldn’t shock us that the progressive Left, represented by the Senate Democrats, don’t care about facts or truth either.

It should be easily understood that it is possible to abhor and condemn sexual assault categorically and also support Judge Kavanaugh, based on fact, reason, and standards of proof. Doing so requires the ability to understand why the presumption of innocence and objectivity is critically important to each individual case and why the lack of corroborative evidence is insufficient to prove a belief or allegation.

Moreover, Dr. Ford is not actually the embodiment of every victim. When juries across the country render verdicts of guilty or not guilty in criminal sex-offense cases, they are not rendering a judgment on the premise of sexual assault being morally wrong. A verdict of not guilty in one instance does not mean that jury is somehow condoning sexual assault in all other instances. It is a matter of proof and truth-seeking.

But the progressive Left is systematically creating the illusion that every man is guilty of sexual misconduct simply on the basis of his gender. If you are a man, you are presumptively a sex offender, and it doesn’t matter what evidence exists or doesn’t exist. A mere allegation is sufficient because men are toxic anyway. And if you support the American legal tradition requiring evidence and proof before condemnation, you are condoning sexual assault. The Women’s March official Twitter feed posted pictures of every Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee after the hearing with the banner “RAPE APOLOGIST” and the caption to each senator, “You are a rape apologist.”

Thus, the latest wave of the #MeToo movement is suggesting that if the jury in the court of public opinion supports Kavanaugh, even though the record lacks any evidence that he is in fact actually guilty of sexual assault, then we are all turning our backs on every single legitimate victim. God help the “old white male” Republican senators because #MeToo is ready to condemn them, too. In the age of “progressive” liberalism, the campaign against the “old white male” represents the ageism, racism, and sexism that are central to their partisan platform.

Consider the absurd overreactions from women who have actually been treated as equals by men — which is supposedly what the feminist movement is about. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said Ben Shapiro was “catcalling” her when he offered to debate her. He actually treated her the same as any other political candidate. But because he is a man and she is a woman, he must have had some underlying gross sexual intent.

The newest manifestation of #MeToo is undermining everything the civil-rights movement stood for in the 1960s. At that time, presumptions of guilt and inequality were based on race. Today, they’re based on gender. Is this the America we have fought for? Is this the America that values genuine freedom? We must keep fighting to preserve and protect liberty and justice for all.

Conserving our American principles of law and justice is rooted in the recognition that every person has certain rights and inherent dignity as a human being. The progressive Left is trying to effectively strip Judge Kavanaugh of his rights and inherent dignity and sacrifice him on the altar of feminism, and with him, every male in America. “Believe women” is saying that no man deserves a defense, even if unjustly or falsely accused. Kavanaugh sat before the Senate as the modern-day Tom Robinson, with only Senator Lindsey Graham as his Atticus Finch.

As a woman, I am ashamed this could happen in America today. This is the sad state of our culture today and why it is so important for women, especially, to stand up to support Judge Kavanaugh. Standing up for him is not only about his fitness for office and confirmation, but is standing up for the principle that no man in this country can be stripped of his good name, integrity, and competence for civil service simply on the basis of his gender.

Women must stand up and stand firm for true equality. These men are our fathers, brothers, husbands, and sons. What happens when #MeToo comes after them? We must be reasoned and reasonable. There are true victims, and there are false accusations. That’s why we have due process in each individual instance and constitutional protections against guilt by association.

Being pro-woman does not require being anti-man.

Most Popular

Year Zero

Every cultural revolution starts at year zero, whether explicitly or implicitly. The French Revolution recalibrated the calendar to begin anew, and the genocidal Pol Pot declared his own Cambodian revolutionary ascension as the beginning of time. Somewhere after May 25, 2020, the death of George Floyd, while ... Read More

Year Zero

Every cultural revolution starts at year zero, whether explicitly or implicitly. The French Revolution recalibrated the calendar to begin anew, and the genocidal Pol Pot declared his own Cambodian revolutionary ascension as the beginning of time. Somewhere after May 25, 2020, the death of George Floyd, while ... Read More
Education

Destroy the ‘Public’ Education System

‘Public” schools have been a catastrophe for the United States. This certainly isn’t an original assertion, but as we watch thousands of authoritarian brats tearing down the legacies of George Washington and Abraham Lincoln, it’s more apparent than ever. State-run schools have undercut two fundamental ... Read More
Education

Destroy the ‘Public’ Education System

‘Public” schools have been a catastrophe for the United States. This certainly isn’t an original assertion, but as we watch thousands of authoritarian brats tearing down the legacies of George Washington and Abraham Lincoln, it’s more apparent than ever. State-run schools have undercut two fundamental ... Read More
U.S.

A Data Double Take: Police Shootings

In a recent article, social scientist Patrick Ball revisited his and Kristian Lum’s 2015 study, which made a compelling argument for the underreporting of lethal police shootings by the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS). Lum and Ball’s study may be old, but it bears revisiting amid debates over the American ... Read More
U.S.

A Data Double Take: Police Shootings

In a recent article, social scientist Patrick Ball revisited his and Kristian Lum’s 2015 study, which made a compelling argument for the underreporting of lethal police shootings by the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS). Lum and Ball’s study may be old, but it bears revisiting amid debates over the American ... Read More
Culture

How Long Will Margaret Sanger Last?

Much of the radical Left is at present consumed by a feverish desire to erase from U.S. history anyone whom they’ve deemed in some way insufficiently loyal to the progressive creed of 2020. The statue-toppling brigades have exercised little discretion in determining which of our leaders are no longer fit for ... Read More
Culture

How Long Will Margaret Sanger Last?

Much of the radical Left is at present consumed by a feverish desire to erase from U.S. history anyone whom they’ve deemed in some way insufficiently loyal to the progressive creed of 2020. The statue-toppling brigades have exercised little discretion in determining which of our leaders are no longer fit for ... Read More
Education

Meritocracy without Meeting

Harvard University announced that it was canceling in-person classes for the entire upcoming academic year because of COVID-19. Students can attend digital Harvard for the exact same price. Some of my fellow conservatives are wondering if the stresses of pandemic conditions will finally pop an over-inflated ... Read More
Education

Meritocracy without Meeting

Harvard University announced that it was canceling in-person classes for the entire upcoming academic year because of COVID-19. Students can attend digital Harvard for the exact same price. Some of my fellow conservatives are wondering if the stresses of pandemic conditions will finally pop an over-inflated ... Read More
Culture

A Triumph at Mount Rushmore

If nothing else, President Donald Trump’s July Fourth speech at Mount Rushmore clarified the battle lines of our culture war. The New York Times called the speech “dark and divisive,” while an Associated Press headline declared, “Trump pushes racial division.” A Washington Post story said the speech ... Read More
Culture

A Triumph at Mount Rushmore

If nothing else, President Donald Trump’s July Fourth speech at Mount Rushmore clarified the battle lines of our culture war. The New York Times called the speech “dark and divisive,” while an Associated Press headline declared, “Trump pushes racial division.” A Washington Post story said the speech ... Read More
U.S.

Bad News about the Virus

On the menu today: an important update about indications that the coronavirus is now more contagious than it used to be, with far-reaching ramifications for how we fight this pandemic; a point on the recent complaints about the Paycheck Protection Program; and a new book for everyone closely following the debate ... Read More
U.S.

Bad News about the Virus

On the menu today: an important update about indications that the coronavirus is now more contagious than it used to be, with far-reaching ramifications for how we fight this pandemic; a point on the recent complaints about the Paycheck Protection Program; and a new book for everyone closely following the debate ... Read More